Summer Kickoff Sale 2025 640x340 S SP.png

Subscription Sale Pop Up - Silver/Silver Plus

Events

Maritime

Surface

Air Cargo

Magazine

Supply chain

Resources

Gateway

Breakbulk News

Container Shipping News

Port News

Trucking News

Rail News

Air Cargo Forwarder News

Air Cargo Carriers News

Transport, Trade and Regulation News

Logistics Technology News

Cool Cargo News

Last Mile News

Industrial Real Estate News

Special Reports

Quarterly Intelligence Report

Breakbulk carriers

Ro/ro cargo

Energy projects

Heavy-haul transport

Project cargo

Container lines

Trans-Atlantic

Forwarding

Asia-Europe

Trans-Pacific

Drayage

Port infrastructure

Breakbulk ports

North American ports

Marine terminals

International ports

Longshore labor

Truckload

Truck brokers

Flatbed

Trucking labor

North-American rail

International rail

Intermodal providers

Intermodal Savings Index

Domestic Intermodal Service Scorecard

Breakbulk Quarterly Intelligence

Platts Containers Update

Summer Kickoff Sale 2025 640x340_FT A.png

Subscription Sale Pop Up - Free/Free Trials

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The trade group of ocean carriers is exempt from US antitrust scrutiny under an agreement it filed with the FMC five years ago, but the agency is now questioning that arrangement. </div>

The trade group of ocean carriers is exempt from US antitrust scrutiny under an agreement it filed with the FMC five years ago, but the agency is now questioning that arrangement.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is reviewing why the World Shipping Council should fall under US shipping law, a probe that could end the antitrust exemption for the WSC’s ocean carrier members to discuss cooperative matters. The FMC announced Thursday it was investigating the “working arrangement” between WSC’s members and whether that agreement violates US shipping law. Under US shipping law, ocean carriers or other regulated entities must file agreements to cooperate on commercial matters, exempting them from antitrust claims. WSC filed its cooperation agreement with the FMC in 2020, two decades after it was formed. The FMC ordered the WSC to show why the agency has “jurisdiction over the agreement and should not cancel the agreement as outside the agency’s jurisdiction.” The WSC agreement does not cover rates, operations, capacity or other strictly commercial matters. However, the group said it filed the agreement so members could discuss other issues such as safety, environmental and legal matters that could fall under FMC jurisdiction. But the FMC questioned that view in its Thursday order. The agency said the WSC may not be a regulated entity under the Shipping Act because it does not provide ocean transportation services. While its members are ocean carriers, within the confines of the agreement filed with the FMC, the members are not acting under their capacity as regulated carriers, the agency said. “An entity engaged only in the discussion and lobbying activities under the agreement would not qualify as an ‘ocean common carrier’ under the Shipping Act because it is performing none of the functions that define a common carrier,” the FMC said. The agency conceded that the WSC’s work on cargo screening may fall under the type of operational activities that are covered in FMC-filed agreements. But the agency said courts have previously ruled the WSC’s type of agreement “was meant as a narrow catch-all closely related to other explicitly operations-focused agreement categories” in US shipping law. While FMC agreements allow carriers and others to avoid antitrust scrutiny, “a trade association not involved in providing ocean transportation service does not appear to be engaged in the type of conduct Congress intended to immunize from scrutiny by antitrust enforcers and private plaintiffs,” the FMC’s order said. <h3>Two months to reply</h3>The FMC has given the WSC two months to reply to the order, with the agency’s final decision expected next March. WSC said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce that its 2020 agreement was filed “in accordance with its legal obligation (under US shipping law) and with the encouragement of the FMC.” “As a global trade association, the World Shipping Council takes its regulatory compliance responsibilities very seriously,” WSC said. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a> </div>

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is reviewing why the World Shipping Council should fall under US shipping law, a probe that could end the antitrust exemption for the WSC’s ocean carrier members to discuss cooperative matters. The FMC announced Thursday it was investigating the “working arrangement” between WSC’s members and whether that agreement violates US shipping law. Under US shipping law, ocean carriers or other regulated entities must file agreements to cooperate on commercial matters, exempting them from antitrust claims. WSC filed its cooperation agreement with the FMC in 2020, two decades after it was formed. The FMC ordered the WSC to show why the agency has “jurisdiction over the agreement and should not cancel the agreement as outside the agency’s jurisdiction.” The WSC agreement does not cover rates, operations, capacity or other strictly commercial matters. However, the group said it filed the agreement so members could discuss other issues such as safety, environmental and legal matters that could fall under FMC jurisdiction. But the FMC questioned that view in its Thursday order. The agency said the WSC may not be a regulated entity under the Shipping Act because it does not provide ocean transportation services. While its members are ocean carriers, within the confines of the agreement filed with the FMC, the members are not acting under their capacity as regulated carriers, the agency said. “An entity engaged only in the discussion and lobbying activities under the agreement would not qualify as an ‘ocean common carrier’ under the Shipping Act because it is performing none of the functions that define a common carrier,” the FMC said. The agency conceded that the WSC’s work on cargo screening may fall under the type of operational activities that are covered in FMC-filed agreements. But the agency said courts have previously ruled the WSC’s type of agreement “was meant as a narrow catch-all closely related to other explicitly operations-focused agreement categories” in US shipping law. While FMC agreements allow carriers and others to avoid antitrust scrutiny, “a trade association not involved in providing ocean transportation service does not appear to be engaged in the type of conduct Congress intended to immunize from scrutiny by antitrust enforcers and private plaintiffs,” the FMC’s order said. Two months to reply The FMC has given the WSC two months to reply to the order, with the agency’s final decision expected next March. WSC said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce that its 2020 agreement was filed “in accordance with its legal obligation (under US shipping law) and with the encouragement of the FMC.” “As a global trade association, the World Shipping Council takes its regulatory compliance responsibilities very seriously,” WSC said. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com

FMC probes legal standing of World Shipping Council agreement

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">New bottlenecks in Louisiana and Mississippi are now affecting freight flows between Mexico and the Southeast US.</div>

New bottlenecks in Louisiana and Mississippi are now affecting freight flows between Mexico and the Southeast US.

<div class="phx-topic">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) is making progress in restoring normal rail service in the southern US following a troubled systems integration, but the epicenter of disruptions has shifted from Texas to critical points in Louisiana and Mississippi, where intermodal and carload traffic converge. Congestion initially began in Laredo and Wylie, Texas, outside Dallas after a <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/cpkc-grapples-with-complaints-over-us-canada-terminal-operations-6009914">May 3 systems upgrade</a> went poorly as CPKC was transitioning legacy Kansas City Southern (KCS) systems to Canadian Pacific networks. Service in Wylie has largely returned to normal, but new bottlenecks in Shreveport, Louisiana, and Jackson, Mississippi, are now affecting freight flows between Mexico and the Southeast US. “CPKC is continuing to devote the resources and attention necessary to return service levels to the normal range expeditiously,” CPKC wrote in a <a href="https://www.stb.gov/cpkc-merger-oversight/">June 25 letter</a> to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). “CPKC continues to project that it will achieve a return of service performance to the normal range for the vast majority of customers by the second half of July.” CPKC dwell times in the hot spots have risen sharply since May, according to data from the Association of American Railroads (AAR). In Shreveport, the railroad’s average dwell time has increased nearly 70% year over year in the last seven weeks. In Jackson, it is up 77%. In Laredo, another intermodal crew change location, CPKC dwells have skyrocketed 127% during the same period, according to the AAR data. CPKC told the STB that company executives remain stationed at key locations, including Shreveport and Jackson, to address the ongoing issues. Inconsistent container flow Shreveport is the largest switching yard on the former Kansas City Southern network, while Jackson is the second-largest. Switching yards primarily handle non-containerized freight, but Jackson and Shreveport also serve as crew change locations for intermodal trains traveling between Mexico/Texas and the Southeast. Multiple CPKC customers have said the flow of containers between Mexico/Texas and the Southeast has been inconsistent in recent weeks. “On northbound Mexico to the Southeast, we experienced long delays at the ramp after customs cleared but before boxes were loaded and moved on a train, although it has improved in the last week,” one customer said. “Customer service is struggling [and] getting information on distressed freight is difficult.” A second customer said their shipments have gotten stuck in various Gulf Coast locations in recent weeks. CPKC told the STB the on-time performance to deliver railcars to non-containerized customers improved in all parts of the network week over week through June 20, but the on-time performance of manifest trains, which carry a mix of cargo and go into yards such as Jackson and Shreveport, fell week over week, to 55.8%. Delays in Jackson and Shreveport also affect interchange partners such as CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Railway (NS). Train crews are scheduled around expected handoff times, but when CPKC trains arrive late, crews on connecting railroads can exhaust their federally mandated hours before reaching the next crew change point, further compounding delays. NS interchanges freight with CPKC in Shreveport and Meridian, Mississippi, while CSX exchanges containers in Myrtlewood, Alabama. CPKC said it plans to focus on this stretch of the network in the coming week. “[Staff] will maintain their in-person presence at locations across the legacy KCS network to support operating personnel and customers … with a focus in the coming week on the Southeast Division (areas east and southeast of Shreveport),” the railroad said in its letter to the STB. Contact Ari Ashe at <a href="mailto:ari.ashe@spglobal.com">ari.ashe@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) is making progress in restoring normal rail service in the southern US following a troubled systems integration, but the epicenter of disruptions has shifted from Texas to critical points in Louisiana and Mississippi, where intermodal and carload traffic converge. Congestion initially began in Laredo and Wylie, Texas, outside Dallas after a May 3 systems upgrade went poorly as CPKC was transitioning legacy Kansas City Southern (KCS) systems to Canadian Pacific networks. Service in Wylie has largely returned to normal, but new bottlenecks in Shreveport, Louisiana, and Jackson, Mississippi, are now affecting freight flows between Mexico and the Southeast US. “CPKC is continuing to devote the resources and attention necessary to return service levels to the normal range expeditiously,” CPKC wrote in a June 25 letter to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). “CPKC continues to project that it will achieve a return of service performance to the normal range for the vast majority of customers by the second half of July.” CPKC dwell times in the hot spots have risen sharply since May, according to data from the Association of American Railroads (AAR). In Shreveport, the railroad’s average dwell time has increased nearly 70% year over year in the last seven weeks. In Jackson, it is up 77%. In Laredo, another intermodal crew change location, CPKC dwells have skyrocketed 127% during the same period, according to the AAR data. CPKC told the STB that company executives remain stationed at key locations, including Shreveport and Jackson, to address the ongoing issues. Inconsistent container flow Shreveport is the largest switching yard on the former Kansas City Southern network, while Jackson is the second-largest. Switching yards primarily handle non-containerized freight, but Jackson and Shreveport also serve as crew change locations for intermodal trains traveling between Mexico/Texas and the Southeast. Multiple CPKC customers have said the flow of containers between Mexico/Texas and the Southeast has been inconsistent in recent weeks. “On northbound Mexico to the Southeast, we experienced long delays at the ramp after customs cleared but before boxes were loaded and moved on a train, although it has improved in the last week,” one customer said. “Customer service is struggling [and] getting information on distressed freight is difficult.” A second customer said their shipments have gotten stuck in various Gulf Coast locations in recent weeks. CPKC told the STB the on-time performance to deliver railcars to non-containerized customers improved in all parts of the network week over week through June 20, but the on-time performance of manifest trains, which carry a mix of cargo and go into yards such as Jackson and Shreveport, fell week over week, to 55.8%. Delays in Jackson and Shreveport also affect interchange partners such as CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Railway (NS). Train crews are scheduled around expected handoff times, but when CPKC trains arrive late, crews on connecting railroads can exhaust their federally mandated hours before reaching the next crew change point, further compounding delays. NS interchanges freight with CPKC in Shreveport and Meridian, Mississippi, while CSX exchanges containers in Myrtlewood, Alabama. CPKC said it plans to focus on this stretch of the network in the coming week. “[Staff] will maintain their in-person presence at locations across the legacy KCS network to support operating personnel and customers … with a focus in the coming week on the Southeast Division (areas east and southeast of Shreveport),” the railroad said in its letter to the STB. Contact Ari Ashe at ari.ashe@spglobal.com .

CPKC disruptions in Gulf states now impacting carload, intermodal traffic

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Diversifying suppliers out of China has been a long-term trend among tech companies, but a recent acceleration of that shift is driven by fresh trade tensions rather than a desire to divest entirely, says Everstream Analytics.</div>

Diversifying suppliers out of China has been a long-term trend among tech companies, but a recent acceleration of that shift is driven by fresh trade tensions rather than a desire to divest entirely, says Everstream Analytics.

<div class="phx-topic">Escalating trade tensions and ongoing tariff uncertainties are adding to rising labor costs, prompting technology giants to accelerate the diversification of suppliers away from China, according to a new report from supply chain insight provider Everstream Analytics. While the diversification of manufacturing has been a long-term trend, the recent increase in that shift is being driven more by the need to reduce short-term risk in the face of recent trade disruption rather than a desire to completely divest from China, noted Jena Santoro, global head of research and analytics at Everstream. “Our analysis shows Thailand and Vietnam have nearly doubled their tech suppliers since 2019, while companies like HP are committing to move 90% of their manufacturing out of China by next year,” Santoro told the Journal of Commerce Thursday. The report, “Shifting away from China,” analyzed supplier data from 2019 to 2024 from tech majors that included Samsung, Apple, Dell, Nokia and NXP, and found the companies were moving core product lines to alternative manufacturing centers. India, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Taiwan have emerged as the most prominent alternative suppliers to China for the technology industry, the report found. The products most affected by the diversification strategies were smartphones, smart watches, computers and laptops. “But the reality is that China spent more than 30 years building its manufacturing ecosystem, and it may take just as long for alternatives to match that scale,” Santoro said. “So, while companies are absolutely diversifying, and they need to, this is about reducing risk, not replacing China entirely. At least not anytime soon.” <h3>End of 90-day pause on tariffs </h3>The Everstream report highlighted the upcoming end to the 90-day pause on US tariffs on China on Aug. 14 and the trade restrictions that could be imposed following its expiry. “Trade between China and the US remains unstable, with the current negotiations only resulting in a 90-day pause on the escalated tariff scheme, which includes a 125% import tariff on Chinese goods,” the report stated. “This level of tariff would make many technology products prohibitively expensive if manufactured entirely in China, creating strong financial incentives for diversification,” it added. “Global technology manufacturers will likely continue to seek alternative suppliers in countries perceived as less risky for business continuity.” On top of the trade tensions are long-term trends in China’s workforce that have led to an increasingly less cost-efficient labor market, a factor that has long encouraged companies to consider investing in cheaper production systems in other parts of the world as a way to increase margins. That trend shows no signs of reversal, as China no longer has the developing economy wages it once had. “Given these ... realities, technology supply chains with procurement operations integrated in China have become less stable and reliably more expensive than potential alternatives,” the Everstream report found. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com.</a></div>

Escalating trade tensions and ongoing tariff uncertainties are adding to rising labor costs, prompting technology giants to accelerate the diversification of suppliers away from China, according to a new report from supply chain insight provider Everstream Analytics. While the diversification of manufacturing has been a long-term trend, the recent increase in that shift is being driven more by the need to reduce short-term risk in the face of recent trade disruption rather than a desire to completely divest from China, noted Jena Santoro, global head of research and analytics at Everstream. “Our analysis shows Thailand and Vietnam have nearly doubled their tech suppliers since 2019, while companies like HP are committing to move 90% of their manufacturing out of China by next year,” Santoro told the Journal of Commerce Thursday. The report, “Shifting away from China,” analyzed supplier data from 2019 to 2024 from tech majors that included Samsung, Apple, Dell, Nokia and NXP, and found the companies were moving core product lines to alternative manufacturing centers. India, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Taiwan have emerged as the most prominent alternative suppliers to China for the technology industry, the report found. The products most affected by the diversification strategies were smartphones, smart watches, computers and laptops. “But the reality is that China spent more than 30 years building its manufacturing ecosystem, and it may take just as long for alternatives to match that scale,” Santoro said. “So, while companies are absolutely diversifying, and they need to, this is about reducing risk, not replacing China entirely. At least not anytime soon.” End of 90-day pause on tariffs The Everstream report highlighted the upcoming end to the 90-day pause on US tariffs on China on Aug. 14 and the trade restrictions that could be imposed following its expiry. “Trade between China and the US remains unstable, with the current negotiations only resulting in a 90-day pause on the escalated tariff scheme, which includes a 125% import tariff on Chinese goods,” the report stated. “This level of tariff would make many technology products prohibitively expensive if manufactured entirely in China, creating strong financial incentives for diversification,” it added. “Global technology manufacturers will likely continue to seek alternative suppliers in countries perceived as less risky for business continuity.” On top of the trade tensions are long-term trends in China’s workforce that have led to an increasingly less cost-efficient labor market, a factor that has long encouraged companies to consider investing in cheaper production systems in other parts of the world as a way to increase margins. That trend shows no signs of reversal, as China no longer has the developing economy wages it once had. “Given these ... realities, technology supply chains with procurement operations integrated in China have become less stable and reliably more expensive than potential alternatives,” the Everstream report found. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com.

Tech giants shift production out of China as trade tariffs raise supply risk: analysis

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The carrier said vessels on the five-day transit to Philadelphia will carry food, apparel, industrial products and consumer goods. </div>

The carrier said vessels on the five-day transit to Philadelphia will carry food, apparel, industrial products and consumer goods.

<div class="phx-topic">US-based ocean carrier Crowley will expand its intra-Americas network in July with a new direct service linking ports in Guatemala and Honduras to Philadelphia. The five-day transit will be Crowley’s first route between Central America and the US Northeast Coast. The first northbound voyage for the service, using the 1,400-TEU Copan, will leave Central America for Philadelphia on July 3. A statement from Crowley this week announcing the service did not provide details on its frequency but said the vessels will carry food, apparel, industrial products and consumer goods. Reinier van Delden, vice president of commercial operations for Crowley Logistics, said in the statement the service, using new LNG-powered vessels, will “deliver the fastest transit times in the market.” “This means less inventory idle time, lower supply chain costs, and longer shelf life for critical products like fresh produce,” he said. The service, which van Delden said already has “significant booking commitments,” will serve Central America’s Northern Zone, which includes El Salvador and Nicaragua in addition to Guatemala and Honduras. The vessels used by Crowley for the service can carry various container sizes for dry cargo and have capacity for 300 refrigerated boxes. According to data from PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global, import volumes from Central America’s Northern Zone into the East Coast of North America have been relatively steady in recent years; May 2025 volumes of 50,121 TEUs were down just 3.3% from May 2019. PIERS data shows imports from the Northern Zone accounted for 3.2% of imports to the East Coast of North America in May. In March, which is the peak season for Central American plantain exports, that share climbed to 3.6%. Northbound perishables cargo includes plantains, pineapples and melons, according to PIERS. The new service from Crowley comes after the company launched in May a three-day ocean service from Tuxpan, Mexico, to Gulfport, Mississippi. Crowley also started a <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/crowley-cn-strike-mexico-intermodal-deal-through-port-of-mobile-5220379">multimodal Mexico-US service in 2023</a>. Also this week, Green Tide Logistics <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/mexico-us-ocean-market-expands-amid-growing-nearshoring-interest-6031786">announced a combined truck-ocean service</a> linking the Gulf Coast of Mexico with Philadelphia. Contact Laura Robb at <a href="mailto:laura.robb@spglobal.com">laura.robb@spglobal.com</a>.  </div>

US-based ocean carrier Crowley will expand its intra-Americas network in July with a new direct service linking ports in Guatemala and Honduras to Philadelphia. The five-day transit will be Crowley’s first route between Central America and the US Northeast Coast. The first northbound voyage for the service, using the 1,400-TEU Copan, will leave Central America for Philadelphia on July 3. A statement from Crowley this week announcing the service did not provide details on its frequency but said the vessels will carry food, apparel, industrial products and consumer goods. Reinier van Delden, vice president of commercial operations for Crowley Logistics, said in the statement the service, using new LNG-powered vessels, will “deliver the fastest transit times in the market.” “This means less inventory idle time, lower supply chain costs, and longer shelf life for critical products like fresh produce,” he said. The service, which van Delden said already has “significant booking commitments,” will serve Central America’s Northern Zone, which includes El Salvador and Nicaragua in addition to Guatemala and Honduras. The vessels used by Crowley for the service can carry various container sizes for dry cargo and have capacity for 300 refrigerated boxes. According to data from PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global, import volumes from Central America’s Northern Zone into the East Coast of North America have been relatively steady in recent years; May 2025 volumes of 50,121 TEUs were down just 3.3% from May 2019. PIERS data shows imports from the Northern Zone accounted for 3.2% of imports to the East Coast of North America in May. In March, which is the peak season for Central American plantain exports, that share climbed to 3.6%. Northbound perishables cargo includes plantains, pineapples and melons, according to PIERS. The new service from Crowley comes after the company launched in May a three-day ocean service from Tuxpan, Mexico, to Gulfport, Mississippi. Crowley also started a multimodal Mexico-US service in 2023 . Also this week, Green Tide Logistics announced a combined truck-ocean service linking the Gulf Coast of Mexico with Philadelphia. Contact Laura Robb at laura.robb@spglobal.com . 

Crowley launches first service linking Central America to US Northeast Coast

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Swire, UWL’s original partner for the express service to Seattle, will phase out its vessels during July while new partner Emirate Shipping Line rotates into the loop.</div>

Swire, UWL’s original partner for the express service to Seattle, will phase out its vessels during July while new partner Emirate Shipping Line rotates into the loop.

<div class="phx-topic">Third-party logistics provider UWL is switching the ocean carrier it uses for its Vietnamese trans-Pacific container service to Seattle — and swapping in a new China call on the loop — with a view to eventually offering weekly sailings on the niche service. UWL Chief Executive Duncan Wright said in a letter to customers this week the company signed a contract with Emirates Shipping Line (ESL) to become the new vessel operator on its Sun Chief Express Service, replacing Swire Shipping, part of Asian conglomerate Swire Group. UWL originally partnered with Swire <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/new-vietnam-pnw-express-service-comes-amid-rise-in-se-asia-imports-5195234">to launch the Sun Chief Express in 2022</a>. The service connects Vietnam’s Hai Phong and Ho Chi Minh City ports with Seattle, offering about 2,700 TEUs in biweekly vessel capacity and an approximate 20-day sailing time. Wright said that while UWL was vetting other vessel operators for possibly offering a weekly service, Swire decided to “phase out” its involvement in the Sun Chief service. The last Swire ship will depart Ho Chi Minh port on July 14, while two westbound sailings during July on Swire vessels will be blanked as part of the phaseout. The first ESL vessel, the 2,782-TEU Bright, will depart Ho Chi Minh port on July 22. It will call Shekou in China before continuing to Seattle. The Sun Chief service will remain biweekly for the time being. Dubai-based ESL is the 23rd-largest ocean carrier globally, focusing chiefly on “niche and emerging trade lanes across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa,” UWL said. ESL operates a fleet of 11 ships, with capacities ranging between 2,700 TEUS and 6,700 TEUs. UWL added that ESL’s experience in the intra-Asia trade will allow the Sun Chief to eventually serve “additional key markets across Southeast Asia and the Indian Subcontinent.” Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Third-party logistics provider UWL is switching the ocean carrier it uses for its Vietnamese trans-Pacific container service to Seattle — and swapping in a new China call on the loop — with a view to eventually offering weekly sailings on the niche service. UWL Chief Executive Duncan Wright said in a letter to customers this week the company signed a contract with Emirates Shipping Line (ESL) to become the new vessel operator on its Sun Chief Express Service, replacing Swire Shipping, part of Asian conglomerate Swire Group. UWL originally partnered with Swire to launch the Sun Chief Express in 2022 . The service connects Vietnam’s Hai Phong and Ho Chi Minh City ports with Seattle, offering about 2,700 TEUs in biweekly vessel capacity and an approximate 20-day sailing time. Wright said that while UWL was vetting other vessel operators for possibly offering a weekly service, Swire decided to “phase out” its involvement in the Sun Chief service. The last Swire ship will depart Ho Chi Minh port on July 14, while two westbound sailings during July on Swire vessels will be blanked as part of the phaseout. The first ESL vessel, the 2,782-TEU Bright, will depart Ho Chi Minh port on July 22. It will call Shekou in China before continuing to Seattle. The Sun Chief service will remain biweekly for the time being. Dubai-based ESL is the 23rd-largest ocean carrier globally, focusing chiefly on “niche and emerging trade lanes across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa,” UWL said. ESL operates a fleet of 11 ships, with capacities ranging between 2,700 TEUS and 6,700 TEUs. UWL added that ESL’s experience in the intra-Asia trade will allow the Sun Chief to eventually serve “additional key markets across Southeast Asia and the Indian Subcontinent.” Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

UWL locks in new vessel partner for trans-Pacific Vietnam service

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Unifor, the union representing more than 2,100 truck drivers, couriers, and warehouse and clerical workers in seven Canadian provinces, will vote on the agreement on Friday and Saturday.</div>

Unifor, the union representing more than 2,100 truck drivers, couriers, and warehouse and clerical workers in seven Canadian provinces, will vote on the agreement on Friday and Saturday.

<div class="phx-topic">DHL Express Canada and its union have reached an agreement in principle to end a contract dispute that forced the parcel carrier to shut down service in the country late last week. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Unifor, the union representing more than 2,100 truck drivers, couriers, and warehouse and clerical workers in seven Canadian provinces, will vote on the tentative deal on Friday and Saturday. “Upon successful ratification, DHL Express Canada expects to lift [the] service suspension with immediate effect,” the company said in a statement late Wednesday. DHL Express Canada locked out Unifor workers on June 8 after the two sides couldn’t reach a deal on a new collective bargaining agreement. DHL was <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/dhl-express-to-suspend-canadian-parcel-business-amid-labor-dispute-6026786">forced to shut down service</a> as of June 20, the day Canadian federal legislation preventing the use of replacement workers went into effect. As a result, DHL stopped accepting parcels within Canada as well as cross-border US-Canada business. The move did not affect the company’s less-than-truckload or other supply chain service businesses. DHL’s competitors such as Canada Post, FedEx, and UPS were operating normally, so the overall disruption within Canada was minimal. Nevertheless, shippers who had to make last-minute changes were paying higher rates. Contact Ari Ashe at <a href="mailto:ari.ashe@spglobal.com">ari.ashe@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

DHL Express Canada and its union have reached an agreement in principle to end a contract dispute that forced the parcel carrier to shut down service in the country late last week. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Unifor, the union representing more than 2,100 truck drivers, couriers, and warehouse and clerical workers in seven Canadian provinces, will vote on the tentative deal on Friday and Saturday. “Upon successful ratification, DHL Express Canada expects to lift [the] service suspension with immediate effect,” the company said in a statement late Wednesday. DHL Express Canada locked out Unifor workers on June 8 after the two sides couldn’t reach a deal on a new collective bargaining agreement. DHL was forced to shut down service as of June 20, the day Canadian federal legislation preventing the use of replacement workers went into effect. As a result, DHL stopped accepting parcels within Canada as well as cross-border US-Canada business. The move did not affect the company’s less-than-truckload or other supply chain service businesses. DHL’s competitors such as Canada Post, FedEx, and UPS were operating normally, so the overall disruption within Canada was minimal. Nevertheless, shippers who had to make last-minute changes were paying higher rates. Contact Ari Ashe at ari.ashe@spglobal.com .

DHL, union workers reach tentative deal to end Canadian work stoppage

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Container market participants should be open to a better way to support their overall risk management, particularly with the amount of new tonnage scheduled to hit the market in the near future.</div>

Container market participants should be open to a better way to support their overall risk management, particularly with the amount of new tonnage scheduled to hit the market in the near future.

<div class="phx-topic">This piece follows <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/near-constant-disruption-giving-new-momentum-to-freight-futures-5979859">Peter Tirschwell’s update</a> on the freight forward agreement (FFA) market. While I agree with many points raised and was personally involved in many of the 2011 discussions, there is a wider point that needs to be raised and deepened. Let’s start with a basic premise of risk management: If you own an asset, you have a long position for that asset. In the case of container shipping, assuming the carrier is also the vessel owner (directly or disponent), then that asset is the long position (or more precisely, the vessel’s nominal TEU capacity is the long position, as TEUs are the primary revenue-earning unit). Let’s also assume a vessel’s capacity is 20,000 TEUs and it does five round trips per annum on an Asia-Europe service that requires 10 vessels. The combined asset or long position is 1 million TEUs per annum. The enduring question is how to earn revenue to at least cover the 1 million TEUs at margin cost and normal profit (or at higher revenue but lower volume). On the supply side, you could sell slots to others, preferably on a used/unused basis either as a slot charter or as part of a vessel-sharing agreement/alliance. The downside of the latter is clearly the requirement to purchase reciprocal slots. Let’s assume you sell off 20,000 slots per annum to a small competitor. You have covered 2% and only have 980,000 TEUs to cover! On the demand side, you have many contracts, with the promise, estimate or best effort of the counterparty to honor the volumes in the agreed time windows. But let’s say you have 50% contract coverage (we’ll include your 2% of slot sales). You will have contracted at above-normal profit, giving you a further 15% cover for your 1 million slots. However, we’ll subtract 5% for BCO/NVO underperformance with no fault on either party. You are back to 60% coverage and still require cover for the remaining 40%. Your standard assumption would be to look at historical indicators such as GDP (which may or may not correlate to actual trade and TEUs), purchasing managers’ indices and (hopefully) talk to key customers, and look at other inputs the clever economists will consider. These will be plugged in to spit out a number with an upside and downside tolerance that will show a correlation between all these indicators and likely volume trends. But what about trade wars, Houthi militants, COVID-19 and any other number of white or black swan events? Any of these can affect demand in the short to long term and defy standard assumptions. So in reality, your 40% capacity long position has just one strategy: optimism. <h3>Be risk ‘aware’ </h3>I would advise taking a few preliminary steps. The first is to benchmark the container FFA market with other futures markets. Start with the Baltic for dry and wet bulk. While helpful, there are many dissimilarities in the physical market versus container to make this only of passing interest. Try more of the commodities such as metals, but in any case, understand more deeply what is in play, what risks you carry and how to manage them. Also, look in-house with your treasury teams to more deeply understand your foreign exchange trading and fuel hedging. The good news is you have at least some good risk management practices, knowledge and controls in place. Second, get to know how the exchanges function. There have been concerns raised about counterparty risk. The exchanges/indexes of choice are ICE/NYSHEX and Baltic/Freightos, which will obviate this concern. The exchanges will manage liquidity on margin calls and overall exposure. The days of relying solely on less-credible indices are long gone, and players like Xeneta and others are well established and reliable. Finally, ensure your organization is well prepared. The benefit of the existing indices is they fall relatively easily into existing carrier trade profit and loss (PnL). This makes it easy for visibility and transparency for PnL owners and allows for direct allocation of the costs to manage and the eventual revenue streams. Be very clear about the amount of FFA exposure you want in total and by quarter and at what PnL level. Be sure to implement strict controls at the PnL level to avoid creating undue risk at the overall level. If it were my money, I’d keep an enterprise level of 5% of my overall TEU capacity as a maximum. I realize some or all of this may fall on deaf ears for those who are naturally cautious and/or risk averse. My suggestion is to be “risk aware” and be open to a better way to support your overall risk management, particularly with the amount of new tonnage scheduled to hit the market in the near future. John McCauley, formerly a vice president of transportation and logistics at Cargill, now consults for shippers. Contact him at <a href="mailto:john-mccauley1@outlook.com">john-mccauley1@outlook.com</a>. </div>

This piece follows Peter Tirschwell’s update on the freight forward agreement (FFA) market. While I agree with many points raised and was personally involved in many of the 2011 discussions, there is a wider point that needs to be raised and deepened. Let’s start with a basic premise of risk management: If you own an asset, you have a long position for that asset. In the case of container shipping, assuming the carrier is also the vessel owner (directly or disponent), then that asset is the long position (or more precisely, the vessel’s nominal TEU capacity is the long position, as TEUs are the primary revenue-earning unit). Let’s also assume a vessel’s capacity is 20,000 TEUs and it does five round trips per annum on an Asia-Europe service that requires 10 vessels. The combined asset or long position is 1 million TEUs per annum. The enduring question is how to earn revenue to at least cover the 1 million TEUs at margin cost and normal profit (or at higher revenue but lower volume). On the supply side, you could sell slots to others, preferably on a used/unused basis either as a slot charter or as part of a vessel-sharing agreement/alliance. The downside of the latter is clearly the requirement to purchase reciprocal slots. Let’s assume you sell off 20,000 slots per annum to a small competitor. You have covered 2% and only have 980,000 TEUs to cover! On the demand side, you have many contracts, with the promise, estimate or best effort of the counterparty to honor the volumes in the agreed time windows. But let’s say you have 50% contract coverage (we’ll include your 2% of slot sales). You will have contracted at above-normal profit, giving you a further 15% cover for your 1 million slots. However, we’ll subtract 5% for BCO/NVO underperformance with no fault on either party. You are back to 60% coverage and still require cover for the remaining 40%. Your standard assumption would be to look at historical indicators such as GDP (which may or may not correlate to actual trade and TEUs), purchasing managers’ indices and (hopefully) talk to key customers, and look at other inputs the clever economists will consider. These will be plugged in to spit out a number with an upside and downside tolerance that will show a correlation between all these indicators and likely volume trends. But what about trade wars, Houthi militants, COVID-19 and any other number of white or black swan events? Any of these can affect demand in the short to long term and defy standard assumptions. So in reality, your 40% capacity long position has just one strategy: optimism. Be risk ‘aware’ I would advise taking a few preliminary steps. The first is to benchmark the container FFA market with other futures markets. Start with the Baltic for dry and wet bulk. While helpful, there are many dissimilarities in the physical market versus container to make this only of passing interest. Try more of the commodities such as metals, but in any case, understand more deeply what is in play, what risks you carry and how to manage them. Also, look in-house with your treasury teams to more deeply understand your foreign exchange trading and fuel hedging. The good news is you have at least some good risk management practices, knowledge and controls in place. Second, get to know how the exchanges function. There have been concerns raised about counterparty risk. The exchanges/indexes of choice are ICE/NYSHEX and Baltic/Freightos, which will obviate this concern. The exchanges will manage liquidity on margin calls and overall exposure. The days of relying solely on less-credible indices are long gone, and players like Xeneta and others are well established and reliable. Finally, ensure your organization is well prepared. The benefit of the existing indices is they fall relatively easily into existing carrier trade profit and loss (PnL). This makes it easy for visibility and transparency for PnL owners and allows for direct allocation of the costs to manage and the eventual revenue streams. Be very clear about the amount of FFA exposure you want in total and by quarter and at what PnL level. Be sure to implement strict controls at the PnL level to avoid creating undue risk at the overall level. If it were my money, I’d keep an enterprise level of 5% of my overall TEU capacity as a maximum. I realize some or all of this may fall on deaf ears for those who are naturally cautious and/or risk averse. My suggestion is to be “risk aware” and be open to a better way to support your overall risk management, particularly with the amount of new tonnage scheduled to hit the market in the near future. John McCauley, formerly a vice president of transportation and logistics at Cargill, now consults for shippers. Contact him at john-mccauley1@outlook.com .

Be open to new ways to support your risk management strategy

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">As agricultural exports enter their traditional peak season, it is prudent to be proactive now — while there is still an empty container supply extant in North America. </div>

As agricultural exports enter their traditional peak season, it is prudent to be proactive now — while there is still an empty container supply extant in North America.

<div class="phx-topic">“Where Have All the Flowers Gone?” is a folk song written by American singer-songwriter Pete Seeger. Legend has it that he wrote it while on an airplane to play at Oberlin College, one of the few locations willing to defy the McCarthy hiring blacklist imposed on him. Subsequently, the song became a mainstay of the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War and has been covered by many artists and in many languages. The song utilizes the image of flowers and the cycle of life to depict the cyclical and destructive nature of war. And while I recognize that applying this metaphor to our industry’s cyclicality may be a step too far, I believe that the plaintive refrain, “Oh when will you/we ever learn; Oh, when will you/we ever learn?” certainly applies. In today’s transportation industry, there are very few of us that can remember the days of regulation when we struggled in an economy beset by stagflation. President Jimmy Carter then liberated our sector with deregulation. Because regulation — by design — was intended to ensure excess capacity, two decades of halcyon growth followed as this capacity was redeployed to productive applications. Along with globalization and outsourcing, logistics and supply chain management became industries in their own right, and intermodal was a key driver. However, about 25 years ago, the “free” capacity unleashed by deregulation had been consumed and growth needed to be supported by investment. Coincidentally, these changes took place against the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attack. A bipartisan blue-ribbon commission was established, and three years later, they released their report. The findings were extensive. The government was not prepared and did not know how to respond. Problems with intelligence collection, analysis, sharing across agencies, and a lack of coordination among federal agencies exacerbated the challenges. In fact, the whole structure represented a maze of siloed and disaggregated responsibilities. When I read the report, I was struck by the potential for a future commission assembled to write many of the same findings about the transportation network in our country. I actually wrote a white paper in 2004 claiming that it would be unnecessary to convene an investigation of the inevitable supply chain meltdown because it was already written. All that was necessary was to take the 9/11 report and replace “national security” with “supply chain.” <h3>COVID-19 drove changes </h3>Of course, our industry did nothing to address these structural shortcomings and muddled on until COVID-19 struck. At that time, it seemed that our entire industry adopted the “4C” excuse — everything was the fault of COVID, China, Congestion and Chassis. Everyone was surprised that such a terrible fate could befall our industry. Even worse, our industry seemed to be represented by our least qualified spokespeople and most of the media had no idea of basic facts. Somehow, we all survived that mess. Many of the problems impacted the entire network. The maelstrom of detention and demurrage bills gave rise to the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA-22). It increased the authority of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) to promote the growth and development of US exports through an ocean transportation system that is competitive, efficient and economical. Beyond its mandate addressing complaints about detention and demurrage charges, OSRA-22 prohibits common ocean carriers, marine terminal operators or ocean transportation intermediaries from unreasonably refusing cargo space when available or resorting to other unfair or unjustly discriminatory methods. These protections were welcomed by the export community. However, we have to recognize that a complaint process after the fact may be insufficient to provide adequate protection if there is no effective remedy available. At times of high demand (and rates) for imports from Asia to North America, ocean carriers frequently evacuate all containers as soon as their import cargo is devanned. This moots the question of available space because there may be vessel space — but no empty containers.  As agricultural exports enter their traditional peak season, we believe that it is prudent to be proactive now, while there is still an empty container supply extant in North America. The Agriculture Transportation Coalition convenes June 16 for its annual meeting. I am sure Executive Director Peter Friedmann will have this high on the agenda; we do not want to be wondering where all the containers have gone. Contact Ted Prince at <a href="mailto:ted@tricitiesintermodal.com">ted@tricitiesintermodal.com</a>.</div>

“Where Have All the Flowers Gone?” is a folk song written by American singer-songwriter Pete Seeger. Legend has it that he wrote it while on an airplane to play at Oberlin College, one of the few locations willing to defy the McCarthy hiring blacklist imposed on him. Subsequently, the song became a mainstay of the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War and has been covered by many artists and in many languages. The song utilizes the image of flowers and the cycle of life to depict the cyclical and destructive nature of war. And while I recognize that applying this metaphor to our industry’s cyclicality may be a step too far, I believe that the plaintive refrain, “Oh when will you/we ever learn; Oh, when will you/we ever learn?” certainly applies. In today’s transportation industry, there are very few of us that can remember the days of regulation when we struggled in an economy beset by stagflation. President Jimmy Carter then liberated our sector with deregulation. Because regulation — by design — was intended to ensure excess capacity, two decades of halcyon growth followed as this capacity was redeployed to productive applications. Along with globalization and outsourcing, logistics and supply chain management became industries in their own right, and intermodal was a key driver. However, about 25 years ago, the “free” capacity unleashed by deregulation had been consumed and growth needed to be supported by investment. Coincidentally, these changes took place against the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attack. A bipartisan blue-ribbon commission was established, and three years later, they released their report. The findings were extensive. The government was not prepared and did not know how to respond. Problems with intelligence collection, analysis, sharing across agencies, and a lack of coordination among federal agencies exacerbated the challenges. In fact, the whole structure represented a maze of siloed and disaggregated responsibilities. When I read the report, I was struck by the potential for a future commission assembled to write many of the same findings about the transportation network in our country. I actually wrote a white paper in 2004 claiming that it would be unnecessary to convene an investigation of the inevitable supply chain meltdown because it was already written. All that was necessary was to take the 9/11 report and replace “national security” with “supply chain.” COVID-19 drove changes Of course, our industry did nothing to address these structural shortcomings and muddled on until COVID-19 struck. At that time, it seemed that our entire industry adopted the “4C” excuse — everything was the fault of COVID, China, Congestion and Chassis. Everyone was surprised that such a terrible fate could befall our industry. Even worse, our industry seemed to be represented by our least qualified spokespeople and most of the media had no idea of basic facts. Somehow, we all survived that mess. Many of the problems impacted the entire network. The maelstrom of detention and demurrage bills gave rise to the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA-22). It increased the authority of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) to promote the growth and development of US exports through an ocean transportation system that is competitive, efficient and economical. Beyond its mandate addressing complaints about detention and demurrage charges, OSRA-22 prohibits common ocean carriers, marine terminal operators or ocean transportation intermediaries from unreasonably refusing cargo space when available or resorting to other unfair or unjustly discriminatory methods. These protections were welcomed by the export community. However, we have to recognize that a complaint process after the fact may be insufficient to provide adequate protection if there is no effective remedy available. At times of high demand (and rates) for imports from Asia to North America, ocean carriers frequently evacuate all containers as soon as their import cargo is devanned. This moots the question of available space because there may be vessel space — but no empty containers.  As agricultural exports enter their traditional peak season, we believe that it is prudent to be proactive now, while there is still an empty container supply extant in North America. The Agriculture Transportation Coalition convenes June 16 for its annual meeting. I am sure Executive Director Peter Friedmann will have this high on the agenda; we do not want to be wondering where all the containers have gone. Contact Ted Prince at ted@tricitiesintermodal.com .

Act now before we wonder where all the containers have gone

World

Asia

China

Purchasing managers’ index (PMI) datasets are compiled from questionnaire responses from a survey panel of senior purchasing executives (or similar) from about 400 companies. For each variable, the index is the sum of the percentage of “higher” responses and half the percentage of “no change” responses. PMIs range from 0 to 100, with a reading above 50 indicating an overall increase compared to the previous month and readings below 50 indicating an overall decrease. S&P Global compiles the China PMI in conjunction with Caixin. [S&P Global](https://ihsmarkit.com/products/pmi.html)

World, US, Asia, China and EU manufacturing PMIs (S&P Global)

World, US, Asia China, EU US PMI Manufacturing (PMI) by S&P Global Gateway

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The surge, however brief, will nonetheless be a welcome boost in business for the ports after a lackluster May and early June.</div>

The surge, however brief, will nonetheless be a welcome boost in business for the ports after a lackluster May and early June.

<div class="phx-topic">Ports along the US West Coast are due to experience a short-lived cargo surge over the next few weeks as importers rush to bring goods into the country ahead of the expiry of temporary tariff relief implemented by the Trump administration. The surge, however brief, will nonetheless be a welcome boost in business for the ports after a lackluster May and early June. Kip Louttit, executive director of the Marine Exchange of Southern California, told the Journal of Commerce that vessel arrivals scheduled for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in the coming weeks “are the highest container ships on-the-way levels since January 2025 and July and September 2024.” According to the ports’ websites, Los Angeles projects that imports this week will total 138,519 TEUs before dipping to 124,713 TEUs next week and 101,003 TEUs for the week of July 6. Long Beach is forecasting its imports will total 84,109 TEUs this week before jumping to 125,286 TEUs next week and 116,947 TEUs the week of July 6. Further out, 93,797 TEUs are expected for the week of July 13, rising again to 114,073 TEUs for the week of July 20. The ports consider 100,000 TEUs or greater to be a strong week. In May, Los Angeles totaled 320,878 TEUs in imports, or approximately 71,000 TEUs a week, according to PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global. Long Beach saw 296,348 TEUs, or about 66,000 TEUs weekly. The import boost expected over the next few weeks comes ahead of <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/trans-pacific-spot-rates-falling-as-tariff-linked-demand-surge-loses-steam-6027420">two key dates put in place by the White House — July 9 and Aug. 14</a>. The first is when a 90-day reprieve on higher tariffs against essentially all US trading partners expires; the second is when similar relief on imports from China ends. What will happen after those dates is unknown. The Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA) of Seattle and Tacoma, meanwhile, forecasts 55 vessel arrivals for June, 49 in July and 48 in August. That’s up from 46 in May. “Looking forward, numbers will likely increase for the last two weeks in June,” a spokesperson for the NWSA told the Journal of Commerce. “There are both fewer blank sailings and additional cargo that is anticipated for the second half of the month.” West Coast ports should not face any significant congestion issues handling the spike in imports in the coming few weeks given the weak month of May. <h3>Could rate decline pause? </h3>An increase in import volumes over the coming weeks could slow the ongoing decline in spot rates in the eastbound trans-Pacific. The rate from Asia to the West Coast as of Monday was $2,900 per FEU, down 10% on the week and 50% lower than the recent high of $6,040 per FEU on June 6, according to Platts, a Journal of Commerce sister company within S&amp;P Global. “The trans-Pac just seems to be such a moving target,” a forwarder in the Pacific Northwest told the Journal of Commerce. “We’re updating our rates almost daily.” <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="e8c13a3e-9f5a-412f-8741-adbf5e1a7779"></dynamic-object></div>The import surge on the West Coast also seems to be additional proof that the peak shipping season — normally August through October — has come early this year. The most recent <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/pause-on-tariffs-prompts-us-retailers-to-upgrade-summer-import-forecast-6022230">Global Port Tracker</a> published by the National Retail Federation and Hackett Associates forecasts that US imports will decline 8.1% in July, 14.7% in August, 21.8% in September and 19.8% in October compared with the same months in 2024. Contact Bill Mongelluzzo at <a href="mailto:bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com">bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com</a>.Contact Laura Robb at <a href="mailto:laura.robb@spglobal.com">laura.robb@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Ports along the US West Coast are due to experience a short-lived cargo surge over the next few weeks as importers rush to bring goods into the country ahead of the expiry of temporary tariff relief implemented by the Trump administration. The surge, however brief, will nonetheless be a welcome boost in business for the ports after a lackluster May and early June. Kip Louttit, executive director of the Marine Exchange of Southern California, told the Journal of Commerce that vessel arrivals scheduled for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in the coming weeks “are the highest container ships on-the-way levels since January 2025 and July and September 2024.” According to the ports’ websites, Los Angeles projects that imports this week will total 138,519 TEUs before dipping to 124,713 TEUs next week and 101,003 TEUs for the week of July 6. Long Beach is forecasting its imports will total 84,109 TEUs this week before jumping to 125,286 TEUs next week and 116,947 TEUs the week of July 6. Further out, 93,797 TEUs are expected for the week of July 13, rising again to 114,073 TEUs for the week of July 20. The ports consider 100,000 TEUs or greater to be a strong week. In May, Los Angeles totaled 320,878 TEUs in imports, or approximately 71,000 TEUs a week, according to PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global. Long Beach saw 296,348 TEUs, or about 66,000 TEUs weekly. The import boost expected over the next few weeks comes ahead of two key dates put in place by the White House — July 9 and Aug. 14 . The first is when a 90-day reprieve on higher tariffs against essentially all US trading partners expires; the second is when similar relief on imports from China ends. What will happen after those dates is unknown. The Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA) of Seattle and Tacoma, meanwhile, forecasts 55 vessel arrivals for June, 49 in July and 48 in August. That’s up from 46 in May. “Looking forward, numbers will likely increase for the last two weeks in June,” a spokesperson for the NWSA told the Journal of Commerce. “There are both fewer blank sailings and additional cargo that is anticipated for the second half of the month.” West Coast ports should not face any significant congestion issues handling the spike in imports in the coming few weeks given the weak month of May. Could rate decline pause? An increase in import volumes over the coming weeks could slow the ongoing decline in spot rates in the eastbound trans-Pacific. The rate from Asia to the West Coast as of Monday was $2,900 per FEU, down 10% on the week and 50% lower than the recent high of $6,040 per FEU on June 6, according to Platts, a Journal of Commerce sister company within S&P Global. “The trans-Pac just seems to be such a moving target,” a forwarder in the Pacific Northwest told the Journal of Commerce. “We’re updating our rates almost daily.” The import surge on the West Coast also seems to be additional proof that the peak shipping season — normally August through October — has come early this year. The most recent Global Port Tracker published by the National Retail Federation and Hackett Associates forecasts that US imports will decline 8.1% in July, 14.7% in August, 21.8% in September and 19.8% in October compared with the same months in 2024. Contact Bill Mongelluzzo at bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com .Contact Laura Robb at laura.robb@spglobal.com .

Quick-hit, tariff-driven import surge on tap for US West Coast ports

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">In a statement posted on the FMC’s website, Sola said his last day at the agency would be June 30 and did not give a reason for his departure.</div>

In a statement posted on the FMC’s website, Sola said his last day at the agency would be June 30 and did not give a reason for his departure.

<div class="phx-topic">Chairman Louis Sola announced Tuesday he is leaving the US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) a mere five months after being <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/trump-appoints-louis-sola-to-chairmans-slot-at-fmc-5926442">appointed to lead the agency</a> responsible for regulating ocean trade to and from US ports. In a statement posted on the FMC’s website, Sola said his last day at the agency will be June 30. He did not give a reason for his departure. “I have had the privilege of helping safeguard the integrity of the US maritime industry, bringing greater transparency to port operations, and overseeing a supply chain that moves more than $5 trillion in goods annually,” Sola said in the statement. Sola, appointed to the commission in 2018 during President Donald Trump’s first term, pointed to work he did as a commissioner during the pandemic to resolve supply chain-related disruptions, as well as a recent investigation into flags of convenience, which resulted in calls for the deflagging of more than 140 sanctioned vessels. On Jan. 20, Trump elevated Sola to replace previous FMC Chairman Daniel Maffei, with a mandate to support initiatives around balanced trade and an emphasis on enhancing trade to and from Latin America. Early in his brief tenure as chairman, Sola was outspoken about whether the Panama Canal was a <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/fmc-chair-questions-level-playing-field-in-panama-canal-operations-5932469">“level playing field”</a> for US shippers due to Chinese operational involvement in ports on both ends of the canal. He also was leading an investigation into whether global chokepoints, primarily major canals, were hurting US maritime transportation interests. Sola formerly served on the Florida Board of Pilots Commissioners and as CEO of a ship and yacht brokerage before being nominated to the FMC. Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Chairman Louis Sola announced Tuesday he is leaving the US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) a mere five months after being appointed to lead the agency responsible for regulating ocean trade to and from US ports. In a statement posted on the FMC’s website, Sola said his last day at the agency will be June 30. He did not give a reason for his departure. “I have had the privilege of helping safeguard the integrity of the US maritime industry, bringing greater transparency to port operations, and overseeing a supply chain that moves more than $5 trillion in goods annually,” Sola said in the statement. Sola, appointed to the commission in 2018 during President Donald Trump’s first term, pointed to work he did as a commissioner during the pandemic to resolve supply chain-related disruptions, as well as a recent investigation into flags of convenience, which resulted in calls for the deflagging of more than 140 sanctioned vessels. On Jan. 20, Trump elevated Sola to replace previous FMC Chairman Daniel Maffei, with a mandate to support initiatives around balanced trade and an emphasis on enhancing trade to and from Latin America. Early in his brief tenure as chairman, Sola was outspoken about whether the Panama Canal was a “level playing field” for US shippers due to Chinese operational involvement in ports on both ends of the canal. He also was leading an investigation into whether global chokepoints, primarily major canals, were hurting US maritime transportation interests. Sola formerly served on the Florida Board of Pilots Commissioners and as CEO of a ship and yacht brokerage before being nominated to the FMC. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com .

FMC’s Sola to leave agency months after being elevated to chairman’s slot

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The railroad said the disruptions were the result of the switchover to a new operating system in early May, with the technology integration intended to unify old KCS systems into the CP network.</div>

The railroad said the disruptions were the result of the switchover to a new operating system in early May, with the technology integration intended to unify old KCS systems into the CP network.

<div class="phx-topic">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) has acknowledged to US regulators that its customers have experienced poor service from the railroad since early May and vowed to fix the core issue — a messy transition from legacy Kansas City Southern (KCS) computer systems to CP networks. <a href="https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/DCMS_External_PROD/1750688210397/309692.pdf">A letter from CPKC</a> to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB), dated June 20, outlined how the railroad will restore service to normal levels within the next month. The disruptions have centered not on the trains themselves but rather on the first and last miles of journeys, with the problems linked to terminals and switch yards. “CPKC’s level of service performance on the legacy KCS network since May 3, 2025 … does not measure up to CPKC’s standards for the quality of service it provides customers or the efficient operation of its network,” the railroad wrote to the STB. “CPKC also wishes to reassure the board that there is no broader underlying service problem.” CPKC said the disruptions were the result of the switchover to a new operating system in early May. The technology integration was intended to unify old KCS systems into the CP network. But CPKC wrote that the rollout encountered critical failures that disrupted car tracking, customer billing and switching operations. The ripple effects were significant, forcing crews to manually reconstruct data. Congestion soon mounted across the former KCS network, and some of the railroad’s customers were caught unprepared. <h3>Impact on intermodal and manifest trains </h3>In the initial weeks of the disruption, truck drivers were <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/cpkc-grapples-with-complaints-over-us-canada-terminal-operations-6009914">spending hours waiting in lines</a> at terminals as crews had to be stationed at the gate to write receipts by hand. One CPKC customer had containers stuck inside the Wylie terminal in Texas for 10 days, according to data from GPS devices on the boxes. Two high-volume intermodal customers told the Journal of Commerce they pulled freight off the CPKC network in response. But Schneider National, CPKC’s top US partner, said the disruption was a minor blip. While CPKC’s letter to the STB focused on non-containerized freight, manifest and intermodal trains can impact one another in Laredo and Wylie, Texas, because they often share the same human resources, equipment and infrastructure. CPKC said the on-time performance of manifest trains, which hold a mixture of cargo, fell to 57.3% in a rolling four-week average ending June 13, dropping each week since the May 3 transition. Prior to May, on-time performance was regularly 75% to 85%. The situation was serious enough that CPKC created a “war room” in early May to troubleshoot issues. CPKC also flew in top executives, including COO Mark Redd, from Calgary to locations in Texas and the Gulf Coast to organize remedial efforts. “CPKC soon established cross-functional ‘SWAT-like’ support teams [comprised of experts from Operations, IT, and Network Support, and Marketing &amp; Sales, and including senior executives] to work through the issues arising from the IT transition,” CPKC wrote in the STB letter. “CPKC understands that some customer interactions with CPKC customer service personnel during the period may have been frustrating as a result of the issues with data visibility.” CPKC said it will continue to file weekly supplemental reports to update US regulators on the status of recovery efforts. “This report, along with the weekly cadence of updates we anticipate filing with the board as noted below, will provide those stakeholders with up-to-date data reflecting progress towards a return to normal service,” the railroad wrote. Contact Ari Ashe at <a href="mailto:ari.ashe@spglobal.com">ari.ashe@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) has acknowledged to US regulators that its customers have experienced poor service from the railroad since early May and vowed to fix the core issue — a messy transition from legacy Kansas City Southern (KCS) computer systems to CP networks. A letter from CPKC to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB), dated June 20, outlined how the railroad will restore service to normal levels within the next month. The disruptions have centered not on the trains themselves but rather on the first and last miles of journeys, with the problems linked to terminals and switch yards. “CPKC’s level of service performance on the legacy KCS network since May 3, 2025 … does not measure up to CPKC’s standards for the quality of service it provides customers or the efficient operation of its network,” the railroad wrote to the STB. “CPKC also wishes to reassure the board that there is no broader underlying service problem.” CPKC said the disruptions were the result of the switchover to a new operating system in early May. The technology integration was intended to unify old KCS systems into the CP network. But CPKC wrote that the rollout encountered critical failures that disrupted car tracking, customer billing and switching operations. The ripple effects were significant, forcing crews to manually reconstruct data. Congestion soon mounted across the former KCS network, and some of the railroad’s customers were caught unprepared. Impact on intermodal and manifest trains In the initial weeks of the disruption, truck drivers were spending hours waiting in lines at terminals as crews had to be stationed at the gate to write receipts by hand. One CPKC customer had containers stuck inside the Wylie terminal in Texas for 10 days, according to data from GPS devices on the boxes. Two high-volume intermodal customers told the Journal of Commerce they pulled freight off the CPKC network in response. But Schneider National, CPKC’s top US partner, said the disruption was a minor blip. While CPKC’s letter to the STB focused on non-containerized freight, manifest and intermodal trains can impact one another in Laredo and Wylie, Texas, because they often share the same human resources, equipment and infrastructure. CPKC said the on-time performance of manifest trains, which hold a mixture of cargo, fell to 57.3% in a rolling four-week average ending June 13, dropping each week since the May 3 transition. Prior to May, on-time performance was regularly 75% to 85%. The situation was serious enough that CPKC created a “war room” in early May to troubleshoot issues. CPKC also flew in top executives, including COO Mark Redd, from Calgary to locations in Texas and the Gulf Coast to organize remedial efforts. “CPKC soon established cross-functional ‘SWAT-like’ support teams [comprised of experts from Operations, IT, and Network Support, and Marketing & Sales, and including senior executives] to work through the issues arising from the IT transition,” CPKC wrote in the STB letter. “CPKC understands that some customer interactions with CPKC customer service personnel during the period may have been frustrating as a result of the issues with data visibility.” CPKC said it will continue to file weekly supplemental reports to update US regulators on the status of recovery efforts. “This report, along with the weekly cadence of updates we anticipate filing with the board as noted below, will provide those stakeholders with up-to-date data reflecting progress towards a return to normal service,” the railroad wrote. Contact Ari Ashe at ari.ashe@spglobal.com .

CPKC acknowledges service woes to US regulators, vows remediation

Use code SKSGW995 at checkout to save $500 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Wide Box

SUMMER KICKOFF SALE

Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Use code SKSW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Wide Box

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code SkSW25 at checkout to save 25% on a SIlver or Silver Plus annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Wide Box

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

SUMMER KICKOFF SALE: Use code SKSGW995 to save $500 on an annual Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Offer Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SUMMER KICKOFF SALE: Use code SKSW25 to save 25% on first year of a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Offer Box

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

SUMMER KICKOFF SALE: Use code SKSW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on TPM26! 

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Offer Box

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A must-attend conference for shippers & logistics providers moving goods inland

Inland Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Inland25

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

FMC probes legal standing of World Shipping Council agreement

Featured Gateway Chart

Essential Reads

Quick-hit, tariff-driven import surge on tap for US West Coast ports

FMC’s Sola to leave agency months after being elevated to chairman’s slot

CPKC acknowledges service woes to US regulators, vows remediation

Recent Commentary

Be open to new ways to support your risk management strategy

Act now before we wonder where all the containers have gone

Top 5 Most Read Stories