<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping.</div>

The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping.

3586931_FI.jpg

<div>With just a little over a year before the annual bill for container shipping jumps when <a>new global rules requiring the use of low-sulfur fuel (LSF) take effect,</a> the range of costs carriers will aim to pass on to beneficial cargo owners (BCOs) is coming into focus — as are the dimming chances of any rule reprieve.The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping. While estimates and...

With just a little over a year before the annual bill for container shipping jumps when new global rules requiring the use of low-sulfur fuel (LSF) take effect, the range of costs carriers will aim to pass on to beneficial cargo owners (BCOs) is coming into focus — as are the dimming chances of any rule reprieve. The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping. While estimates and the low-sulfur bunker adjustment factors (BAFs) differ, a general sense of the cost of more expensive fuel — a cost carriers will attempt to add on to the average TEU shipped — is becoming more apparent: at least a 30 percent jump in fuel prices. The IMO regulation requires ocean carriers to reduce maximum sulfur emissions from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent, leaving carriers to assess which of three main ways to comply with the rules they will adopt: use LSF, install “scrubbers” on vessels to remove sulfur from the engine emission using regular fuel , or use ships that run on liquefied natural gas (LNG). Various industry estimates put the additional annual cost range of meeting the rule between $13 billion and $15.7 billion. "The importance of this regulation is massive, due first of all to the impact it is going to have on air pollution and the environment, but also on the industry," said Mathieu Girardin, vice president of CMA CGM’s Asia regional office. The low-sufur fuel cost bump The Marseille-based carrier expects that it will raise per-TEU cost by $160. Hapag-Lloyd has issued a range of estimates from $115 to $333 per TEU. Maersk Line estimates its BAF will add between $90 and $1,050 to the cost per FEU, with a rough TEU conversion coming at a range of $45 to $525. In an October announcement of a new BAF formula and fuel cost benchmarking service to help shippers, Drewry estimated fuel surcharges will “increase by 55 to 60 percent” in January 2020, while Jefferies has estimated the LSF will cost at least 50 percent more than current high-sulfur prices. IHS Markit energy analysts predict a “scramble period” of up to a few years when a new equilibrium of supply and demand will be determined by refiners and shipowners. This could result in the price of low-sulfur bunker fuel hovering around $680 per ton in 2020, up more than 30 percent compared with the current price of high-sulfur bunkers. Bunker fuel per ton has been currently in the $490 to $520 range this month, depending on fueling sources. Click to Enlarge . While carriers will face huge increases in their operating costs, which BCOs will be expected to pay, at the far end of the scale, the consumer will not find the LSF rule too taxing. Calculating per mile moved rather than per average TEU, SeaIntelligence says the consumer would pay 78 cents more for a $200 mattress and 39 cents more for a $150 TV. Much of the extensive variation in BAFs is tied to the variability of two factors: the route on which the cargo moves and the price of fuel when the BAF is imposed. Maersk, CMA CGM, and Hapag-Lloyd have provided a different BAF for each of a range of fuel prices on different routes. Maersk’s BAF calculation also takes into account transit time, fuel efficiency, and “trade imbalances between head-haul and backhaul legs,” to work out the fuel consumption, the carrier said in announcing its BAF program. Hapag-Lloyd, aside from fuel and route information, looks at vessel consumption per day, the number of sea and port days spent on the trip, and the volume of TEU shipped. Reactions to ocean carriers’ attempt to recover low-sulfur costs The carriers’ attempt to pass on the higher operating costs to shippers has met a range of reactions, from acceptance by multinational companies — many of which have their BAF formulas and aren’t new to major environmental rules — to shippers and forwarders suspicious about the true costs that will be passed on. “The magnitude of the additional cost is too important for us to pass it on and not be transparent. We build long-term relationships with our customers. Long-term relationships are based on trust and transparency,” Girardin told JOC.com. Acknowledging that past BAF formulas may have been too simple, he said the low-sulfur BAF was formulated on a trade-by-trade basis and will provide greater transparency. He said it’s still being determined how much detail CMA CGM will go into, in terms of various factors affecting fuel cost, including whether LNG-powered vessels were used and the varying cost of fuel per port of call. CMA CGM will receive nine LNG-powered 22,000-TEU ships in 2020 and will deploy some scrubbers, but the IMO mandate will be mostly met through burning LSF. “We do believe [LNG] is the solution for the future. Why? Because it reduces the sulfur emissions by 99 percent as well as it reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 25 percent,” Giardin said. “We hope that it will give us a competitive edge, but that’s not the only reason. Protection of the environment and sustainability were key factors in the decision making.” The task facing shippers, and the variability of factors that go into BAFs, can be seen from the variety of estimates for a BAF on a shipment from the Far East to the US West Coast. Maersk, for example, expects to charge a BAF of $634 to move an FEU on the route if the price of LSF costs $650. Hapag-Lloyd, however, would charge $171 for a TEU on the East Asia-to-US West Coast route with LSF at $650. If the price of fuel were $400, however, the Maersk BAF would be $390 and the Hapag-Lloyd BAF would be $117. Platts' projections Platts has its own estimate. At the start of October, Platts projected the price of LSF would be about $630 as January 2020 arrives. The company estimated that at that level the bunker charge would be $420 per FEU for a 9,000-TEU vessel going from North Asia to the US West Coast with a full load. The company, which bases its estimate on the swap prices of regular fuel and futures prices of LSF, calls the numbers “projections,” rather than forecasts. That scenario would make the BAF on a TEU going on that route about $210, Platts said. However, if the vessel was only 89 percent full, in other words, carrying only 8,010 TEU, that would push up the bunker charge on a FEU to around $472, or $236 per TEU. The IMO in late October rejected efforts by the United States and other member countries to delay some provisions of the low-sulfur bunker fuel rule. One of the proposals was a so-called experience-building phase (EBP), initially promoted by countries including the Bahamas, Liberia, and Panama, that would allow one-time waivers if vessel operators were able to prove that the LSF wasn't available for bunkering at certain ports of call. The IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee on Oct. 26 reaffirmed another element of the 2020 plan that opponents had sought to slow, supporting the March 1, 2020, introduction of a ban on ships carrying non-LSF unless fitted with a scrubber. Contact Hugh R. Morley at hugh.morley@ihsmarkit.com and follow him on Twitter: @HughRMorley1 .Contact Mark Szakonyi at mark.szakonyi@ihsmarkit.com and follow him on Twitter: @szakonyi_joc .

Maritime

Container lines

Transport, Trade and Regulation News

Cost of low-sulfur rule to shippers slowly comes into view

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The legislation aims to incentivize a domestic crane industry and move US ports away from China’s dominant manufacturer.</div>

The legislation aims to incentivize a domestic crane industry and move US ports away from China’s dominant manufacturer.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">Legislation that would provide tax credits for companies to build port cranes in the US has been introduced in the House of Representatives, the latest attempt to shift the manufacturing of logistics equipment away from China. The Port Cranes Tax Credit Act, introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-Mississippi) would reduce “the financial burden for companies investing in American-made cranes and components ... and [cut] US reliance on foreign suppliers for critical port equipment,” Ezell’s office said in a statement Wednesday. The bill would provide a 25% investment tax credit for US companies to manufacture or repair ship-to-shore (STS) cranes. The bill also includes a 40% production tax credit that would rise to 60% if 90% of the crane’s components are also sourced in the US. The legislation takes direct aim at the stranglehold that Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries (ZPMC) has on US port cranes, <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/us-ports-hit-back-at-white-house-move-to-levy-new-tariff-on-chinese-cranes-5192168">with an 80% market share</a>. Some in Congress have alleged that ZPMC cranes at US ports are security risks, offering hackers <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/white-house-counters-risk-of-chinese-port-cranes-with-20-billion-for-us-sourcing-5200230">a way to disrupt operations through remote monitoring software on the cranes</a>. “The threat of cyber intrusions and espionage from the Chinese Communist Party is real,” Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Virginia), one of the bill’s co-sponsors, said in the statement. “I’m deeply concerned that so many of our ports are forced to use cranes manufactured by a Chinese state-owned company.” The legislation has received the endorsement of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), with AAPA President Cary Davis saying the tax credit is “a tangible first step on the supply side toward incentivizing the reshoring of key cargo-handling equipment in the coming years since there are currently no domestic STS crane manufacturers.” The AAPA, though, has been less enthusiastic about other efforts to reshore crane manufacturing. The group said <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/ports-look-to-delay-proposed-us-tariffs-on-chinese-made-cranes-6007628">it was not in favor of the US Trade Representative’s proposed 100% tariff on Chinese-made cranes</a>, part of President Donald Trump’s strategy for the US to regain market share in the maritime logistics industry. The Biden administration kicked off efforts to reshore US STS crane manufacturing following reports of cyber intrusions at US ports, outlining in February 2024 <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/white-house-counters-risk-of-chinese-port-cranes-with-20-billion-for-us-sourcing-5200230">$20 billion in incentives</a> for companies to start making cranes in the US. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Legislation that would provide tax credits for companies to build port cranes in the US has been introduced in the House of Representatives, the latest attempt to shift the manufacturing of logistics equipment away from China. The Port Cranes Tax Credit Act, introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-Mississippi) would reduce “the financial burden for companies investing in American-made cranes and components ... and [cut] US reliance on foreign suppliers for critical port equipment,” Ezell’s office said in a statement Wednesday. The bill would provide a 25% investment tax credit for US companies to manufacture or repair ship-to-shore (STS) cranes. The bill also includes a 40% production tax credit that would rise to 60% if 90% of the crane’s components are also sourced in the US. The legislation takes direct aim at the stranglehold that Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries (ZPMC) has on US port cranes, with an 80% market share . Some in Congress have alleged that ZPMC cranes at US ports are security risks, offering hackers a way to disrupt operations through remote monitoring software on the cranes . “The threat of cyber intrusions and espionage from the Chinese Communist Party is real,” Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Virginia), one of the bill’s co-sponsors, said in the statement. “I’m deeply concerned that so many of our ports are forced to use cranes manufactured by a Chinese state-owned company.” The legislation has received the endorsement of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), with AAPA President Cary Davis saying the tax credit is “a tangible first step on the supply side toward incentivizing the reshoring of key cargo-handling equipment in the coming years since there are currently no domestic STS crane manufacturers.” The AAPA, though, has been less enthusiastic about other efforts to reshore crane manufacturing. The group said it was not in favor of the US Trade Representative’s proposed 100% tariff on Chinese-made cranes , part of President Donald Trump’s strategy for the US to regain market share in the maritime logistics industry. The Biden administration kicked off efforts to reshore US STS crane manufacturing following reports of cyber intrusions at US ports, outlining in February 2024 $20 billion in incentives for companies to start making cranes in the US. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

Port News

Port infrastructure

North American ports

Congress eyes a tax credit for reshoring port crane manufacturing

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Higher costs and shifting deadlines are making business difficult for small cargo owners and those shipping low-value goods.</div>

Higher costs and shifting deadlines are making business difficult for small cargo owners and those shipping low-value goods.

<div class="phx-topic">For years, the guessing game for international logistics managers revolved around ocean freight rate levels and transit time predictability. But today, the biggest unknown for those same managers is the lack of certainty around how US tariffs will impact their total cost of goods sold. More import logistics managers, particularly for smaller cargo owners and those shipping low-value goods, are having to change sourcing locations or stop shipping from any of those spots entirely due to higher tariffs making the cost of buying the goods uneconomical. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/6053066_0.1.jpg"></img></div>This is further complicated by shifting deadlines guiding when various tariffs take effect and forces another consideration on the part of logistics managers who are traditionally focused more on the cost of securing transportation. That broadens the degree to which those logistics managers need to think about things such as sourcing and trade compliance. Indeed, US tariff policy now swings more often and abruptly than ocean spot rates. Some US importers of India-sourced goods are now forced to reconsider whether to keep ordering from the country after President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25% tariff, dealing a blow to India being seen as an emerging production alternative to China. US importers of goods from the European Union are weighing similar considerations <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/trans-atlantic-trade-dispute-averted-as-us-eu-reach-weekend-deal-6051144">after last weekend’s announcement</a> of a 15% US tariff, while the Aug 1. deadline for higher tariffs to kick in against other trade partners looms. The shipping industry is split on whether the deadline will hold or be pushed again after Trump granted an initial extension. A separate Aug. 14 deadline on higher China tariffs <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/us-china-tariff-truce-holds-now-us-says-trump-has-final-say-2025-07-29/">appears headed for an extension</a> after US and Chinese officials failed to reach a deal during talks this week in Stockholm. <h3>Importers’ muddied planning </h3>The whiplash effect of the Trump administration’s trade policy is muddying the ability of US importers to plan in a way that OL USA President Alan Baer said he can’t recall seeing in his 50 years in the industry. US import customers have asked the forwarder to go as far as pulling containers off the docks at origin because the extent of US tariffs no longer makes importing feasible, he said. Other customers have, less dramatically, simply held off on placing new orders and leaned on production lines in countries less affected by US tariffs or they’ve significantly pulled back their orders. One US importer of women’s undergarments used to ship 100 containers monthly from China, but the current US tariffs at 30% make selling all the items to Walmart infeasible, he said. “So, they’re trying to reprice,” said Baer. “They’re looking at, okay, we can’t take it in China anymore, so they moved some sourcing to Ethiopia. They moved some sourcing to Ghana, and it’s a shell game for a lot of companies at the moment, waiting for the dust to settle to figure out where they should try to make stuff that they want to sell.” Larger retailers are certainly mindful of the changing tariff environment and can adjust where to source certain products, to a degree, when they have relationships with manufacturers in multiple countries. They also have more leverage to force the suppliers to take on more of the cost, allowing retailers to spare American consumers higher costs, for now. All this uncertainty translates into foggier-than-usual forecasts from cargo owners to carriers and results in shoulder shrugs from shippers when asked about demand in the medium term. It’s hardly surprising, then, that more container capacity than needed returned to the trans-Pacific after China bookings began rebounding in mid-May, when Trump announced the 90-day pause on US tariffs of 145%. Barometers of future import demand are of limited help to carriers. Consumer sentiment may be improving and the labor market resilient, but economists and a growing number of companies warn that the true impact of higher tariffs on the US economy will show in the cost of products in the second half of the year. The rise in the consumer price index, climbing to 2.7% in June from 2.4% in May — the highest since February — may signal that the impact of higher tariffs is only now beginning to be felt. Contact Mark Szakonyi at <a href="mailto:mark.szakonyi@spglobal.com">mark.szakonyi@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

For years, the guessing game for international logistics managers revolved around ocean freight rate levels and transit time predictability. But today, the biggest unknown for those same managers is the lack of certainty around how US tariffs will impact their total cost of goods sold. More import logistics managers, particularly for smaller cargo owners and those shipping low-value goods, are having to change sourcing locations or stop shipping from any of those spots entirely due to higher tariffs making the cost of buying the goods uneconomical. This is further complicated by shifting deadlines guiding when various tariffs take effect and forces another consideration on the part of logistics managers who are traditionally focused more on the cost of securing transportation. That broadens the degree to which those logistics managers need to think about things such as sourcing and trade compliance. Indeed, US tariff policy now swings more often and abruptly than ocean spot rates. Some US importers of India-sourced goods are now forced to reconsider whether to keep ordering from the country after President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25% tariff, dealing a blow to India being seen as an emerging production alternative to China. US importers of goods from the European Union are weighing similar considerations after last weekend’s announcement of a 15% US tariff, while the Aug 1. deadline for higher tariffs to kick in against other trade partners looms. The shipping industry is split on whether the deadline will hold or be pushed again after Trump granted an initial extension. A separate Aug. 14 deadline on higher China tariffs appears headed for an extension after US and Chinese officials failed to reach a deal during talks this week in Stockholm. Importers’ muddied planning The whiplash effect of the Trump administration’s trade policy is muddying the ability of US importers to plan in a way that OL USA President Alan Baer said he can’t recall seeing in his 50 years in the industry. US import customers have asked the forwarder to go as far as pulling containers off the docks at origin because the extent of US tariffs no longer makes importing feasible, he said. Other customers have, less dramatically, simply held off on placing new orders and leaned on production lines in countries less affected by US tariffs or they’ve significantly pulled back their orders. One US importer of women’s undergarments used to ship 100 containers monthly from China, but the current US tariffs at 30% make selling all the items to Walmart infeasible, he said. “So, they’re trying to reprice,” said Baer. “They’re looking at, okay, we can’t take it in China anymore, so they moved some sourcing to Ethiopia. They moved some sourcing to Ghana, and it’s a shell game for a lot of companies at the moment, waiting for the dust to settle to figure out where they should try to make stuff that they want to sell.” Larger retailers are certainly mindful of the changing tariff environment and can adjust where to source certain products, to a degree, when they have relationships with manufacturers in multiple countries. They also have more leverage to force the suppliers to take on more of the cost, allowing retailers to spare American consumers higher costs, for now. All this uncertainty translates into foggier-than-usual forecasts from cargo owners to carriers and results in shoulder shrugs from shippers when asked about demand in the medium term. It’s hardly surprising, then, that more container capacity than needed returned to the trans-Pacific after China bookings began rebounding in mid-May, when Trump announced the 90-day pause on US tariffs of 145%. Barometers of future import demand are of limited help to carriers. Consumer sentiment may be improving and the labor market resilient, but economists and a growing number of companies warn that the true impact of higher tariffs on the US economy will show in the cost of products in the second half of the year. The rise in the consumer price index, climbing to 2.7% in June from 2.4% in May — the highest since February — may signal that the impact of higher tariffs is only now beginning to be felt. Contact Mark Szakonyi at mark.szakonyi@spglobal.com .

Trans-Pacific

Supply chain

Tariff volatility puts smaller US importers in planning limbo

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">While not yet reflected in freight rates, analysts and forwarders report growing space constraints out of Southeast Asian origins. </div>

While not yet reflected in freight rates, analysts and forwarders report growing space constraints out of Southeast Asian origins.

<div class="phx-topic">European air freight importers are being indirectly affected by a tariff-driven shift in Asian trade flows that is putting capacity out of Southeast Asia under increasing pressure. While deployed air cargo capacity on routes from Southeast Asia to both Europe and the US remains flat this week compared with the average of the past four weeks, the shifting of volume from China to its southern neighbors is tightening available space, according to Jonathan Mellink, head of sales at air cargo analyst Rotate. “Shippers have shifted supply chains to cater for the differences in [US] tariff levies on different countries of origin, and we see these goods — computers, smartphones, auto parts — that were mostly coming out of China are being sourced in other locations,” Mellink told an air freight webinar hosted by Rhenus Logistics this week. For example, Mellink said 90% of all video game consoles were exported from China last year, but 50% of the products were now being sourced from Vietnam. Another example included Apple iPhones made in India, where significant volumes produced for the European market have been shifted to the US. While some electronics such as laptops, semiconductors and smartphones are excluded from the 10% US “reciprocal tariff” on Chinese imports, all imports of Chinese origin are subject to the 20% fentanyl tariff. “Shippers are trying to be agile and change their supply chains to benefit from at least some of the tariff differences out there,” Mellink said. Still, Chris Bode, vice president of global air freight at Rhenus Logistics, said exporters shifting thousands of tons of air freight from China to Southeast Asian manufacturing hubs such as Thailand and Vietnam risk overloading the outbound market. “[Thailand and Vietnam] are exporting roughly 40,000 tons a month on average, and when suddenly you have another 3,000 tons of a single commodity that was originally from China, it can affect global supply and demand,” Bode told the air freight webinar. “If a customer today is importing automotive-related cargo from Thailand into Germany, he will feel the impact of the US tariffs, even though he’s not involved directly with China-US trade,” he added. “It is important to understand how this new supply-demand is going to balance out and what its impact will be on customers that do not have direct trade flows with the US.” <h3>Keeping eggs ‘in the China basket’ </h3>The shifting of trade flows also poses a challenge to airlines, especially those deeply committed to the Chinese market, such as Abu Dhabi’s Etihad Airways. Leonard Rodrigues, director of revenue management and network planning at Etihad Cargo, told the webinar that the carrier in June signed a joint business agreement with Shenzhen-based SF Airlines, the largest cargo carrier in China. “It’s going to be very interesting to see what the impact of the tariffs and the trade volatility will be, because a big share of our eggs is in the China basket,” he told the air freight webinar, noting that Etihad in the past year has increased the number of weekly China flights from 11 to 18. However, Rodrigues said “making life easier” was the fact that Etihad Cargo had low exposure to the US, with only 3% of its freighter capacity deployed on Asia-US trade routes. Another factor insulating the carrier from the shifting trade flows was its size, as Etihad Cargo is a small player compared with the major air freight operators. Despite the shifting trade flows, Rodrigues pointed to the stability of air freight rates, with China-US rates this week close to levels seen during Chinese New Year in early February and China-North Europe up 10% over that time. China-North America rates were at $5.02 per kilogram this week while the China-Europe market was at $4.25/kg, according to the Baltic Air Index. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

European air freight importers are being indirectly affected by a tariff-driven shift in Asian trade flows that is putting capacity out of Southeast Asia under increasing pressure. While deployed air cargo capacity on routes from Southeast Asia to both Europe and the US remains flat this week compared with the average of the past four weeks, the shifting of volume from China to its southern neighbors is tightening available space, according to Jonathan Mellink, head of sales at air cargo analyst Rotate. “Shippers have shifted supply chains to cater for the differences in [US] tariff levies on different countries of origin, and we see these goods — computers, smartphones, auto parts — that were mostly coming out of China are being sourced in other locations,” Mellink told an air freight webinar hosted by Rhenus Logistics this week. For example, Mellink said 90% of all video game consoles were exported from China last year, but 50% of the products were now being sourced from Vietnam. Another example included Apple iPhones made in India, where significant volumes produced for the European market have been shifted to the US. While some electronics such as laptops, semiconductors and smartphones are excluded from the 10% US “reciprocal tariff” on Chinese imports, all imports of Chinese origin are subject to the 20% fentanyl tariff. “Shippers are trying to be agile and change their supply chains to benefit from at least some of the tariff differences out there,” Mellink said. Still, Chris Bode, vice president of global air freight at Rhenus Logistics, said exporters shifting thousands of tons of air freight from China to Southeast Asian manufacturing hubs such as Thailand and Vietnam risk overloading the outbound market. “[Thailand and Vietnam] are exporting roughly 40,000 tons a month on average, and when suddenly you have another 3,000 tons of a single commodity that was originally from China, it can affect global supply and demand,” Bode told the air freight webinar. “If a customer today is importing automotive-related cargo from Thailand into Germany, he will feel the impact of the US tariffs, even though he’s not involved directly with China-US trade,” he added. “It is important to understand how this new supply-demand is going to balance out and what its impact will be on customers that do not have direct trade flows with the US.” Keeping eggs ‘in the China basket’ The shifting of trade flows also poses a challenge to airlines, especially those deeply committed to the Chinese market, such as Abu Dhabi’s Etihad Airways. Leonard Rodrigues, director of revenue management and network planning at Etihad Cargo, told the webinar that the carrier in June signed a joint business agreement with Shenzhen-based SF Airlines, the largest cargo carrier in China. “It’s going to be very interesting to see what the impact of the tariffs and the trade volatility will be, because a big share of our eggs is in the China basket,” he told the air freight webinar, noting that Etihad in the past year has increased the number of weekly China flights from 11 to 18. However, Rodrigues said “making life easier” was the fact that Etihad Cargo had low exposure to the US, with only 3% of its freighter capacity deployed on Asia-US trade routes. Another factor insulating the carrier from the shifting trade flows was its size, as Etihad Cargo is a small player compared with the major air freight operators. Despite the shifting trade flows, Rodrigues pointed to the stability of air freight rates, with China-US rates this week close to levels seen during Chinese New Year in early February and China-North Europe up 10% over that time. China-North America rates were at $5.02 per kilogram this week while the China-Europe market was at $4.25/kg, according to the Baltic Air Index. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Air Cargo

Air Cargo Carriers News

Tariff-linked trade flow shift tightens Asian air freight capacity

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Cargo movers are holding back on executing breakbulk and project cargo shipments as much as possible until there is a clearer picture of costs in the current unsettled market. </div>

Cargo movers are holding back on executing breakbulk and project cargo shipments as much as possible until there is a clearer picture of costs in the current unsettled market.

<div class="phx-topic">“Strategic inaction” is the order of the day in the tariff uncertainty-hit multipurpose vessel (MPV) sector, shippers say. Carlos Cortes, supply chain director for North America at wood products shipper CMPC Forest Products, told the Journal of Commerce the company is continuing to monitor tariff developments, “but we are holding back on executing until we can get better visibility of the final situation,” a direction he described as “strategic inaction.” Cortes noted a slight decline in North American MPV freight rates, but said it was “nothing significant” for contracted rates. “For me, the main takeaway is that the North America market is stable and holding on amid the geopolitical and economic conditions,” he said. Cortes added that he hadn’t seen major changes to capacity availability. “We are expediting vessels as much as we can and for now haven’t experienced major disruptions,” he said. “We will need to see how this changes if [tariffs] are finally confirmed in August.” Continued stability in multipurpose freight rates could be the “calm before the storm” or an indication of a resilient market environment, said specialist broker Toepfer Transport. In its July 25 Multipurpose Shipping Report, the broker said its bellwether Toepfer Multipurpose Index (TMI) remains stable, with almost no significant up or down movement. The index stood at $12,905 per day for July, up just 0.07% from June. The TMI is based on expected average rates for six- to 12-month time charters for 12,500-deadweight-ton (dwt) “F-Type” vessels with safe working loads (SWLs) of 240 to 360 metric tons, as reported to Toepfer by owners and operators. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="ea382181-08cd-4298-912f-87c79836bcf7"></dynamic-object></div><h3>Geopolitical tensions continue to bite </h3>Toepfer said the hoped-for reopening of Red Sea routes to the Suez Canal by the end of the year <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/new-houthi-attacks-likely-kill-hopes-of-shipping-returning-to-red-sea-this-year-6040923">has gone by the boards due to the recent Houthi attacks on commercial vessels</a> and tensions surrounding Israel and Iran. “The expected decline in tonnage-miles for breakbulk and project cargoes associated with the resumption of the Suez transit will not occur in the near future,” the broker said. Meanwhile, the volatility around US import tariffs has compounded market uncertainty, making it difficult to predict project costs and risks involving the US supply chain. A similar downbeat forecast applies to Europe, where weak exports are still sufficient to sustain break-even income for carriers, but “there is no indication of improvement over the next few months,” Toepfer said. A silver lining for the MPV market is that exports from the Far East “continue to ensure the effective utilization of the fleet and the generation of sufficient income for carriers,” Toepfer said. And in Africa, carriers have reported to the broker that there has been “a significant increase of cargo export.” Charters are also steadily moving with the majority of F500 and F600 XL-type MPVs ordered on speculation and fixed at rate levels that reflect the stable-to-positive sentiment of carriers and the expectations of the investors and banks behind the newbuildings. While ordering activity in the MPV space is currently limited — a fault of the “current mismatch between charter rates and prices,” Toepfer said — behind the scenes, there is “a sense of optimism and a readiness to seize opportunities, as many are eager to be prepared once the conditions align.” Contact Carly Fields at <a href="mailto:carly.fields@spglobal.com">carly.fields@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

“Strategic inaction” is the order of the day in the tariff uncertainty-hit multipurpose vessel (MPV) sector, shippers say. Carlos Cortes, supply chain director for North America at wood products shipper CMPC Forest Products, told the Journal of Commerce the company is continuing to monitor tariff developments, “but we are holding back on executing until we can get better visibility of the final situation,” a direction he described as “strategic inaction.” Cortes noted a slight decline in North American MPV freight rates, but said it was “nothing significant” for contracted rates. “For me, the main takeaway is that the North America market is stable and holding on amid the geopolitical and economic conditions,” he said. Cortes added that he hadn’t seen major changes to capacity availability. “We are expediting vessels as much as we can and for now haven’t experienced major disruptions,” he said. “We will need to see how this changes if [tariffs] are finally confirmed in August.” Continued stability in multipurpose freight rates could be the “calm before the storm” or an indication of a resilient market environment, said specialist broker Toepfer Transport. In its July 25 Multipurpose Shipping Report, the broker said its bellwether Toepfer Multipurpose Index (TMI) remains stable, with almost no significant up or down movement. The index stood at $12,905 per day for July, up just 0.07% from June. The TMI is based on expected average rates for six- to 12-month time charters for 12,500-deadweight-ton (dwt) “F-Type” vessels with safe working loads (SWLs) of 240 to 360 metric tons, as reported to Toepfer by owners and operators. Geopolitical tensions continue to bite Toepfer said the hoped-for reopening of Red Sea routes to the Suez Canal by the end of the year has gone by the boards due to the recent Houthi attacks on commercial vessels and tensions surrounding Israel and Iran. “The expected decline in tonnage-miles for breakbulk and project cargoes associated with the resumption of the Suez transit will not occur in the near future,” the broker said. Meanwhile, the volatility around US import tariffs has compounded market uncertainty, making it difficult to predict project costs and risks involving the US supply chain. A similar downbeat forecast applies to Europe, where weak exports are still sufficient to sustain break-even income for carriers, but “there is no indication of improvement over the next few months,” Toepfer said. A silver lining for the MPV market is that exports from the Far East “continue to ensure the effective utilization of the fleet and the generation of sufficient income for carriers,” Toepfer said. And in Africa, carriers have reported to the broker that there has been “a significant increase of cargo export.” Charters are also steadily moving with the majority of F500 and F600 XL-type MPVs ordered on speculation and fixed at rate levels that reflect the stable-to-positive sentiment of carriers and the expectations of the investors and banks behind the newbuildings. While ordering activity in the MPV space is currently limited — a fault of the “current mismatch between charter rates and prices,” Toepfer said — behind the scenes, there is “a sense of optimism and a readiness to seize opportunities, as many are eager to be prepared once the conditions align.” Contact Carly Fields at carly.fields@spglobal.com .

Breakbulk News

MPV shippers adopt ‘strategic inaction’ operating model to counter instability

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A wave of AI-based tools for software developers is likely to raise shipper expectations around the effectiveness and cost of logistics software applications. </div>

A wave of AI-based tools for software developers is likely to raise shipper expectations around the effectiveness and cost of logistics software applications.

<div class="phx-topic">Logistics software vendors and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) are turning en masse toward a relatively new cohort of artificial intelligence (AI)-based code development tools, a trend that’s likely to accelerate and broaden the scope of products aimed at shippers across modes. The impact of these tools is only just starting to reveal itself, with technology providers, whether standalone or part of a 3PL, telling the Journal of Commerce they are using code development tools in an ever-expanding way. Those tools — which notably include fast-growing brands such as Cursor, Windsurf, Base44 and Lovable, among dozens of others — help companies generate, test and audit code, depending on their strengths. The potential impacts of the tools on customers are numerous. Logistics technology providers can build applications, features, or whole new products faster. They can expand the capacity of their engineering teams, without adding headcount, by having coding products build or edit base code, theoretically bringing down a provider’s operating costs. They can also audit code faster and, in general, more accurately than human engineers are able to. “Over 55% of our net new code is now AI-generated using tools like Cursor,” said project44 CEO Jett McCandless. “This includes everything from feature scaffolding to test creation. AI is now an embedded part of how we write and review code.” McCandless said project44 went from virtually no AI-generated code in late 2024 to 45% by March 2025, surpassing 50% by June. “The speed of adoption reflects both developer enthusiasm and a company-wide shift to treat AI as a foundational tool, not a novelty,” he said. <h3>Not alone </h3>And project44 is hardly alone on this fast-moving path. “We started using Cursor almost a year ago, and by the end of 2024 we were at 36% and currently on a journey to get it to 50%,” said Graham Parker, CEO of logistic software vendor ShipAngel. “We were at 44% in June — a little behind target but still an insane leap in a single year. And some of our [venture capital investor’s] portfolio companies in other sectors are at 80% already. “Headcount-wise, you could look at it and say you can now do the work of 20 engineers with maybe five to seven.” Parker pointed to the CEOs of major tech companies such as Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic all saying 90% of code will be written with AI within a year. Journal of Commerce parent company S&amp;P Global recently signed a deal with Anthropic, whose code generation software Claude is one of the cohort of tools being used by developers. “It’s hard to disagree when they likely see unreleased models with this capability or least the clear path to it,” Parker said. Among software developers catering to the logistics industry, the biggest value is the speed and efficiency with which they can create what’s known in software circles as minimum viable products (MVPs). “We’ve probably cut the time to complete a project in half, but that doesn’t necessarily correlate into that project being more worthwhile,” said Tobias Haahr Nielsen, founder of Anthem Agency, which does outsourced software production work in the supply chain and logistics industry. “One major value of AI is that creating MVPs is significantly easier because you can get the AI to do what would otherwise take a long time to write out.” That means, for instance, the MVP might not hit the target, but testing five different iterations would be faster than building one in a traditional development environment. “It’s significantly cheaper to just get an AI agent that has an 80% accuracy rate,” Nielsen said. “So one-fifth fail, but we’re aware of it. That’s very valuable if you’re just testing out the solution. It helps answer the question: would there actually be a use case here?” <h3>Different tools for different uses </h3>The breadth of code development tools available also signals a diversified market that assumes not every technology provider’s needs are the same. Some companies need advanced code generation tools to reduce the costs of hiring and retaining high-level engineering talent. Others want tools that allow people in semi-technical roles — say, a product manager — to build a quick prototype based on a conversation with a customer. There are even products that allow beginners to spin up basic applications through natural language prompts akin to asking ChatGPT to create a PowerPoint presentation. “It gives smaller companies an advantage in that we don’t have to adhere to what tools our development team can and can’t use,” said Jake Hoffman, chief technology officer at logistics software provider Gnosis Freight. “If there’s something that will help us, we’re going to try it out.” Hoffman said Gnosis has “doubled down” on AI development tools, including Cursor, Windsurf and Devin. He said those tools will bridge the gap between developers and non-technical logistics experts in the way no-code and low-code software products bridged the gap between super users and entry-level users of logistics software. He said the tools Gnosis uses tackle tasks as varied as code generation, comprehending how existing code works, and checking for “AI hallucination.” “If I write something six months ago and we hire a new person, we can have that program explain to them why it was written and what it’s intended for,” Hoffman said. <h3>Humans remain important </h3>McCandless said project44’s engineers still take the lead on security-sensitive logic, performance-critical systems and new architectures. “That’s where judgment, experience, and creativity outperform AI suggestions,” he said. “We let AI handle the bulk and humans handle the edge cases and innovation. We prioritize engineers who can design systems and collaborate with AI. Some roles, like manual quality assurance or maintenance, are shrinking as AI absorbs that work. Teams are leaner but more productive.” But the tools are not magic bullets yet. “Cursor works best when the scope is clear and repetitive,” McCandless said. “It’s less effective in legacy codebases or workflows that require interpreting ambiguous business logic. That’s where engineers step in to guide the process.” Parker, however, said he’s seen Cursor improve at tasks with which it once struggled. “Cursor started out being good at writing basic code, then it became good at editing, then auditing, and now architecture,” he said. “You can talk to it and ask questions and it will give you the ‘why.’” While logistics software companies seem largely convinced of the power of AI code development tools, some say the jury is still out on whether it is making engineers more efficient. METR, a research non-profit group measuring the impact of AI capabilities, said in early July that a test of nearly 250 coding tasks undertaken using AI tools slowed developers by 19% when the developers believed they would be 24% faster using those tools. “When AI is allowed, developers spend less time actively coding and searching for information, and instead spend time prompting AI, waiting on or reviewing AI outputs, or idle,” METR said in its report. That has specific relevance to the logistics industry, where the going theory has been that developers with domain expertise in freight and transportation are more effective because they understand the nuances of what customers want. “It’s not the process itself, it’s the nuance in a process,” Hoffman said. “You have code and AI agents that can now speak to the nuance of a process.” For instance, a developer that understands the business case for the software he or she is building can be more effective in prompting AI code generation tools. “The prompt for a new customer can be, ‘look how we implemented for these customers. Do the same, but for this customer call it discharge instead of available date,’” Hoffman said. <h3>Tech titans fuel progress </h3>In terms of the pace of development, Hoffman said the logistics industry is benefiting from intense competition in the generative AI world in both general purpose and industry-specific solutions. “All the big companies in our industry are building on top of OpenAI, Gemini and Grok, and they’re all beating each other up on models,” he said. “So there are two layers of competition where it’s getting better all the time.” Parker said the usage rate in logistics tech will inevitably lag other sectors. “Some of these products are trained on large existing code bases and, as we know, there is a lot less modern logistics code than, say, in [customer relationship management] software,” he said. But he has no doubt that customers will come to demand products from companies using AI development tools. “This era will usher in a new capability to create great products much faster than before, replace legacy products and iterate at lightning speed,” Parker said. “For customers of logistics software, it will drive a higher bar and better products.” Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Logistics software vendors and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) are turning en masse toward a relatively new cohort of artificial intelligence (AI)-based code development tools, a trend that’s likely to accelerate and broaden the scope of products aimed at shippers across modes. The impact of these tools is only just starting to reveal itself, with technology providers, whether standalone or part of a 3PL, telling the Journal of Commerce they are using code development tools in an ever-expanding way. Those tools — which notably include fast-growing brands such as Cursor, Windsurf, Base44 and Lovable, among dozens of others — help companies generate, test and audit code, depending on their strengths. The potential impacts of the tools on customers are numerous. Logistics technology providers can build applications, features, or whole new products faster. They can expand the capacity of their engineering teams, without adding headcount, by having coding products build or edit base code, theoretically bringing down a provider’s operating costs. They can also audit code faster and, in general, more accurately than human engineers are able to. “Over 55% of our net new code is now AI-generated using tools like Cursor,” said project44 CEO Jett McCandless. “This includes everything from feature scaffolding to test creation. AI is now an embedded part of how we write and review code.” McCandless said project44 went from virtually no AI-generated code in late 2024 to 45% by March 2025, surpassing 50% by June. “The speed of adoption reflects both developer enthusiasm and a company-wide shift to treat AI as a foundational tool, not a novelty,” he said. Not alone And project44 is hardly alone on this fast-moving path. “We started using Cursor almost a year ago, and by the end of 2024 we were at 36% and currently on a journey to get it to 50%,” said Graham Parker, CEO of logistic software vendor ShipAngel. “We were at 44% in June — a little behind target but still an insane leap in a single year. And some of our [venture capital investor’s] portfolio companies in other sectors are at 80% already. “Headcount-wise, you could look at it and say you can now do the work of 20 engineers with maybe five to seven.” Parker pointed to the CEOs of major tech companies such as Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic all saying 90% of code will be written with AI within a year. Journal of Commerce parent company S&P Global recently signed a deal with Anthropic, whose code generation software Claude is one of the cohort of tools being used by developers. “It’s hard to disagree when they likely see unreleased models with this capability or least the clear path to it,” Parker said. Among software developers catering to the logistics industry, the biggest value is the speed and efficiency with which they can create what’s known in software circles as minimum viable products (MVPs). “We’ve probably cut the time to complete a project in half, but that doesn’t necessarily correlate into that project being more worthwhile,” said Tobias Haahr Nielsen, founder of Anthem Agency, which does outsourced software production work in the supply chain and logistics industry. “One major value of AI is that creating MVPs is significantly easier because you can get the AI to do what would otherwise take a long time to write out.” That means, for instance, the MVP might not hit the target, but testing five different iterations would be faster than building one in a traditional development environment. “It’s significantly cheaper to just get an AI agent that has an 80% accuracy rate,” Nielsen said. “So one-fifth fail, but we’re aware of it. That’s very valuable if you’re just testing out the solution. It helps answer the question: would there actually be a use case here?” Different tools for different uses The breadth of code development tools available also signals a diversified market that assumes not every technology provider’s needs are the same. Some companies need advanced code generation tools to reduce the costs of hiring and retaining high-level engineering talent. Others want tools that allow people in semi-technical roles — say, a product manager — to build a quick prototype based on a conversation with a customer. There are even products that allow beginners to spin up basic applications through natural language prompts akin to asking ChatGPT to create a PowerPoint presentation. “It gives smaller companies an advantage in that we don’t have to adhere to what tools our development team can and can’t use,” said Jake Hoffman, chief technology officer at logistics software provider Gnosis Freight. “If there’s something that will help us, we’re going to try it out.” Hoffman said Gnosis has “doubled down” on AI development tools, including Cursor, Windsurf and Devin. He said those tools will bridge the gap between developers and non-technical logistics experts in the way no-code and low-code software products bridged the gap between super users and entry-level users of logistics software. He said the tools Gnosis uses tackle tasks as varied as code generation, comprehending how existing code works, and checking for “AI hallucination.” “If I write something six months ago and we hire a new person, we can have that program explain to them why it was written and what it’s intended for,” Hoffman said. Humans remain important McCandless said project44’s engineers still take the lead on security-sensitive logic, performance-critical systems and new architectures. “That’s where judgment, experience, and creativity outperform AI suggestions,” he said. “We let AI handle the bulk and humans handle the edge cases and innovation. We prioritize engineers who can design systems and collaborate with AI. Some roles, like manual quality assurance or maintenance, are shrinking as AI absorbs that work. Teams are leaner but more productive.” But the tools are not magic bullets yet. “Cursor works best when the scope is clear and repetitive,” McCandless said. “It’s less effective in legacy codebases or workflows that require interpreting ambiguous business logic. That’s where engineers step in to guide the process.” Parker, however, said he’s seen Cursor improve at tasks with which it once struggled. “Cursor started out being good at writing basic code, then it became good at editing, then auditing, and now architecture,” he said. “You can talk to it and ask questions and it will give you the ‘why.’” While logistics software companies seem largely convinced of the power of AI code development tools, some say the jury is still out on whether it is making engineers more efficient. METR, a research non-profit group measuring the impact of AI capabilities, said in early July that a test of nearly 250 coding tasks undertaken using AI tools slowed developers by 19% when the developers believed they would be 24% faster using those tools. “When AI is allowed, developers spend less time actively coding and searching for information, and instead spend time prompting AI, waiting on or reviewing AI outputs, or idle,” METR said in its report. That has specific relevance to the logistics industry, where the going theory has been that developers with domain expertise in freight and transportation are more effective because they understand the nuances of what customers want. “It’s not the process itself, it’s the nuance in a process,” Hoffman said. “You have code and AI agents that can now speak to the nuance of a process.” For instance, a developer that understands the business case for the software he or she is building can be more effective in prompting AI code generation tools. “The prompt for a new customer can be, ‘look how we implemented for these customers. Do the same, but for this customer call it discharge instead of available date,’” Hoffman said. Tech titans fuel progress In terms of the pace of development, Hoffman said the logistics industry is benefiting from intense competition in the generative AI world in both general purpose and industry-specific solutions. “All the big companies in our industry are building on top of OpenAI, Gemini and Grok, and they’re all beating each other up on models,” he said. “So there are two layers of competition where it’s getting better all the time.” Parker said the usage rate in logistics tech will inevitably lag other sectors. “Some of these products are trained on large existing code bases and, as we know, there is a lot less modern logistics code than, say, in [customer relationship management] software,” he said. But he has no doubt that customers will come to demand products from companies using AI development tools. “This era will usher in a new capability to create great products much faster than before, replace legacy products and iterate at lightning speed,” Parker said. “For customers of logistics software, it will drive a higher bar and better products.” Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com .

Logistics Technology News

Code generation tools altering efficiency, capacity for logistics technology providers

Use code TPM25GW995 at checkout to save $500 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Wide Box

SAVE ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION AND TPM26

Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Wide Box

UPGRADE TO GOLD FOR JUST $595

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code STS20 at checkout to save 20% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

SAVE ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION: Use code TPM25GW995 to save $500 on an annual Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Offer Box

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE: Use code STSW20 to save 20% on first year of a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Offer Box

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on TPM26! 

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Offer Box

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A must-attend conference for shippers & logistics providers moving goods inland

Inland Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Inland25

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

Discover the news and analysis of supply chain strategies, sourcing and trends covered by the Journal of Commerce. Comprehensive coverage includes customs, trade news, transport news and the latest information about trade regulations.

Stay informed with the latest regulation news and trade updates. Explore comprehensive transportation news and trade regulations today.

Transport, Trade and Regulation News | Journal of Commerce

The Journal of Commerce’s supply chain news and analysis impacting the management of end-to-end supply chains reports on supply chain strategies, cargo visibility, inventory trends, sourcing, customs certification and contract logistics. Supply chain news coverage also delves into refrigerated shipping advancements and management of inventory status, regulatory updates and government funding projects.

Our logistics technology news include logistics technology startups, solutions, and the impact of technology on logistics and supply chain management.

Logistics Technology News | Journal of Commerce

A thorough cool cargoes news by Journal of Commerce. Learn about the latest trends in refrigerated cargo transportation, weight capacity, technology, and more.

Cool Cargo News | Journal of Commerce

Cool Cargo News

Journal of Commerce keeps you informed on the latest last mile news with comprehensive coverage of carriers, logistics, and last mile transportation solutions.

Last Mile News | Journal of Commerce

Last Mile News

Discover the latest industrial real estate news and trends. Covering projects, real estate supply chain, logistics, pricing, cross dock facilities, and more.

Industrial Real Estate News | Journal of Commerce

Industrial Real Estate News

Stay updated on supply chain strategies, cargo visibility, inventory trends and more with our comprehensive supply chain news and analysis.

Latest News

More News & Analysis

Congress eyes a tax credit for reshoring port crane manufacturing

Tariff volatility puts smaller US importers in planning limbo

Tariff-linked trade flow shift tightens Asian air freight capacity