Cost of low-sulfur rule to shippers slowly comes into view

JOC Regulation & Policy Transportation Regulations International Transportation Regulations

Cost of low-sulfur rule to shippers slowly comes into view

, | Oct 30, 2018 3:45PM EDT
The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping.
Regulation & Policy›Transportation Regulations›International Transportation Regulations
Maritime News
Container Lines
International Logistics
Logistics Providers

You are only viewing part of an article, please register to get full access.

More International Transportation Regulations News & Analysis

Major banks aligning with IMO 2050 emissions goals
Carriers gaining confidence in low-sulfur fuel negotiations
IMO’s high-sulfur ‘carriage ban’ to start March 1, 2020
Low-sulfur rule roll-out has Trump factor 'caveat'
Low-sulfur rule top threat to container shipping
Matson: Trans-Pac contracting at ‘stalemate’ over fuel costs
EU: Common low-sulfur BAF would be collusion
Europe block exemption debate reveals deep shipper frustration
Regulation & Policy›Transportation Regulations›International Transportation Regulations
International Logistics
International Logistics›Logistics Providers
Maritime News
Maritime News›Container Lines
Africa
Asia
Australia/Oceania
Europe
Middle East
North America
South America

More on JOC

India’s southeast terminals boost efficiency to grab share
International Ports
EC shipping block exemption critic expects renewal
Regulation & Policy
project44 ties digital tendering to TMS
Technology
Forwarders urged to move beyond just freight selling
Logistics Providers
Matson Logistics taps BlackBerry for intermodal visibility
Rail & Intermodal
USDA expands in-transit cold treatment program
US Transportation Regulations
US-Mexico trucking draws technology investment
Technology
More News & Analysis