Cost of low-sulfur rule to shippers slowly comes into view

JOC Regulation & Policy Transportation Regulations International Transportation Regulations

Cost of low-sulfur rule to shippers slowly comes into view

, | Oct 30, 2018 3:45PM EDT
The failed late-October attempt by some members of the International Maritime Organization to delay some provisions of the rule taking effect Jan. 1, 2020, underscores shippers’ drive to figure out just how much more they’ll be paying for ocean shipping.
Regulation & Policy›Transportation Regulations›International Transportation Regulations
Maritime News
Container Lines
International Logistics
Logistics Providers

You are only viewing part of an article, please register to get full access.

More International Transportation Regulations News & Analysis

EU scrutiny of Asia container shipping subsidies builds
Europe block exemption debate reveals deep shipper frustration
Low-sulfur rule top threat to container shipping
EU: Common low-sulfur BAF would be collusion
EU regulator raises concerns over state shipping subsidies
Low-sulfur rule roll-out has Trump factor 'caveat'
Liner block exemption repeal would bring dire consequences
Matson: Trans-Pac contracting at ‘stalemate’ over fuel costs
Regulation & Policy›Transportation Regulations›International Transportation Regulations
International Logistics
International Logistics›Logistics Providers
Maritime News
Maritime News›Container Lines
Africa
Asia
Australia/Oceania
Europe
Middle East
North America
South America

More on JOC

Toft move a dawning of new era at MSC
Container Lines
Is Canada the light at the end of the PSR intermodal tunnel?
Rail & Intermodal
Scrubbers are wild card for container shipping edge
Container Lines
Maersk increases profitability in weakening container market
Container Lines
Abu Dhabi Ports to link with India’s digital freight portal
International Ports
Danny Wan named executive director at Port of Oakland
US Ports
Landmark judgment puts ILWU on its heels
Longshoreman Labor
More News & Analysis