Analysis: Low-sulfur rule to impact US intermodal

JOC Rail & Intermodal Class I Railroads

Analysis: Low-sulfur rule to impact US intermodal

Lawrence Gross, president, Gross Transportation Consulting | Jan 14, 2019 9:55AM EST
IMO 2020 has the potential to change costs for freight that never comes close to the open sea.
Rail & Intermodal›Class I Railroads
International Logistics
Logistics Providers
Maritime News
Container Lines
Trucking Logistics

Please log in below to view the rest of this page. If you do not have an account, please register or subscribe below for access.

More Class I Railroads News & Analysis

JOC Research: Contract rail savings widen, but spot business may flip to truck
Class I railroads blame shippers in defense of storage fees
Container crunch prompts BNSF, NS to tap additional yards
UP to expand domestic intermodal capacity in Southern California
Port of Mobile sides with CSX, NS in track dispute with Amtrak
Rail & Intermodal›Class I Railroads
International Logistics
International Logistics›Logistics Providers
Maritime News
Maritime News›Container Lines
Trucking Logistics
North America
North America›Canada
North America›Mexico
North America›United States

More on JOC

APM Terminals Los Angeles to levy missed appointment fees from January

APM Terminals

Samudera targets Indian transshipment flow via JNPT-Singapore shuttle

Asian Ports

Saia builds LTL volume, expands terminal network

Saia

Digital bulk, breakbulk marine management startup raises $8.4 million

Project Cargo

Retiring NS CEO leaves legacy of PSR, increased profits

Norfolk Southern Railway
More News & Analysis