Breakbulk26-640X340-SunReg 2.jpg

Event Pop Up

Supply chain

Events

Gateway

Breakbulk News

Container Shipping News

Port News

Trucking News

Rail News

Air Cargo Forwarder News

Air Cargo Carriers News

Transport, Trade and Regulation News

Logistics Technology News

Cool Cargo News

Special Reports

Press Releases

Marine terminals

International ports

Longshore labor

Truckload

Truck brokers

Maritime

Surface

Air Cargo

Magazine

Newsletters

Multimedia

White Papers

Intermodal providers

Commentary

Podcasts

Webcasts

Videos

Annual Review and Outlook

Top Rankings

Quarterly Intelligence Report

Intermodal Savings Index

Domestic Intermodal Service Scorecard

Breakbulk Quarterly Intelligence

Platts Containers Update

Custom Content

Resources

Last Mile News

Industrial Real Estate News

Media Kit

Other

Breakbulk carriers

Ro/ro cargo

Energy projects

Heavy-haul transport

Project cargo

Container lines

Trans-Atlantic

Forwarding

Asia-Europe

Trans-Pacific

Drayage

Port infrastructure

Breakbulk ports

North American ports

Flatbed

Trucking labor

North-American rail

International rail

Top 100 US Exporters

Top 100 US Importers

Top 25 LTL Trucking Companies

Top 25 North American Ports

Top 25 Truckload Companies

Top 40 Container Carriers

Top 50 3PLs

Top 50 Global Container Ports

Top 50 Global Transportation Providers

Top 50 Trucking Companies

Editorial Calendar

Rail Directories

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">UtiliCorp Agrees To Acquire NECOKANSAS CITY, Mo. - UtiliCorp United said it has reached an a</div>

UtiliCorp Agrees To Acquire NECOKANSAS CITY, Mo. - UtiliCorp United said it has reached an a

<div>UtiliCorp AgreesTo Acquire NECOKANSAS CITY, Mo. - UtiliCorp United said it has reached an agreement in principle with NECO Enterprises Inc. under which UtiliCorp will acquire NECO, the parent company of Newport Electric Corp., for about $21.5 million in stock and cash.Newport Electric, Middletown, R.I., is an electric distribution utility serving 30,000 customers in Newport County, R.I.Under the preliminary agreement, UtiliCorp will purchase all of the outstanding stock of NECO Enterprises, approximately 979,750 shares, for $22 a share. Payment will be 55 percent cash and 45 percent UtiliCorp common stock.The companies expect to sign a definitive agreement on or about...

UtiliCorp Agrees To Acquire NECOKANSAS CITY, Mo. - UtiliCorp United said it has reached an agreement in principle with NECO Enterprises Inc. under which UtiliCorp will acquire NECO, the parent company of Newport Electric Corp., for about $21.5 million in stock and cash. Newport Electric, Middletown, R.I., is an electric distribution utility serving 30,000 customers in Newport County, R.I. Under the preliminary agreement, UtiliCorp will purchase all of the outstanding stock of NECO Enterprises, approximately 979,750 shares, for $22 a share. Payment will be 55 percent cash and 45 percent UtiliCorp common stock. The companies expect to sign a definitive agreement on or about March 25. Closing is expected in the third quarter of 1988 . NECO Enterprises had 1987 operating revenue of about $47 million. Nearly all of the power distributed to Newport Electric customers is purchased from other utilities. UtiliCorp, Kansas City, provides electric and gas service to seven states through Missouri Public Service, Kansas Public Service, Peoples Natural Gas, Northern Minnesota Utilities and West Virginia Power. West Kootenay Power in British Columbia operates as a Canadian subsidiary.

ENERGY BRIEFS

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The ubiquity of WiseTech’s flagship platform in the forwarding market has placed a target on its back — one that grew larger with a significant change last week in how it prices its product.</div>

The ubiquity of WiseTech’s flagship platform in the forwarding market has placed a target on its back — one that grew larger with a significant change last week in how it prices its product.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">The number of complaints from forwarders about <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/wisetech-pricing-change-tests-shippers-willingness-to-absorb-tech-costs-6127788">last week’s pricing model change</a> by software provider WiseTech Global is an indication that the company’s flagship product has reached a level of market penetration that many technology companies can only dream of. There’s a saying in technology circles that software companies want their products to be so successful that everyone grumbles about them. That scenario generally only occurs when a product is so ubiquitous that it’s hard to envision an industry using anything else. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/6133280_0.1.jpg"></img></div>CargoWise occupies that place in the world of forwarding. Simply put, most forwarders of any size and scale are using CargoWise for something, whether it be back-office accounting, transportation management, trade compliance or some mix of all three. By some estimates, CargoWise has as much as a 70% share of the forwarding software market, dwarfing the market share that even the largest forwarder, DSV (a current CargoWise customer) has over the logistics industry. Which means that WiseTech Global, with a $16 billion market capitalization, has a more dominant position in its market than its largest customer — with a $60 billion market cap – has in its market. That explains, in part, why something as seemingly banal as a change in the way WiseTech prices its product has created such a furor. Over the past three decades, a small software provider to Australian forwarders has morphed into a global technology powerhouse, a brand everyone loves to hate, because so many people must use its products. WiseTech’s fortress is, in part, built around a string of acquisitions of country-specific customs software vendors it made over the past dozen years. Those acquisitions give WiseTech direct connections to customs authorities that its competitors mostly lack, allowing its customers to remain compliant in a range of export and import markets. The importance of this network of customs capabilities can’t be understated — without it, forwarders struggle to help their customers clear regulatory authorities in key markets. That, along with general ledger and accounting functions upon which many forwarders base their operations, creates a scenario that makes it difficult for forwarders to switch to other solutions. As one forwarder put it to the Journal of Commerce: “It would be like ripping out a person’s circulatory system while the person was still alive.” <h3>No meaningful competition </h3>There is more to WiseTech’s dominance than its own ascent. A number of forwarding software vendors have, over the years, had designs encroaching on WiseTech’s turf. The list is not long, but it includes more than a dozen names, from sizable incumbent rivals such as Descartes, Softlink and Magaya, to upstarts that emerged in the past decade, including GoFreight and NewAge, to even newer entrants such as FreightSuite and Clear.ai. In addition, there are a number of regional providers that tend to focus on forwarders in their geographic market, most notably Riege in Germany. All of those providers collectively have failed to alter WiseTech’s trajectory, even as concerns grew from customers over WiseTech’s annual price increases and its sluggishness in integrating the products from its acquisitions. A new dimension to those concerns arose <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/wisetech-makes-2-billion-gamble-on-overturning-complicated-software-history-6013221">this past May when WiseTech made its biggest ever acquisition</a>, a $2.1 billion deal for E2open, a logistics software vendor that catered primarily to shippers. That enabled WiseTech to offer products directly to the customers of its core CargoWise users. Coupled with the upheaval from the pricing change, and an expectation from most CargoWise customers that the new pricing model would raise technology costs above the normal annual price increases, fully leveraging E2open would seemingly force forwarders to reconsider their use of CargoWise, if that is truly an option. For many, it won’t be. And so, if the anger around the pricing change model eventually passes without a wholesale loss of its customer base, that will be a sign that WiseTech has indeed reached escape velocity, and that the forwarding world is more dependent on the software provider than it had believed. Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

The number of complaints from forwarders about last week’s pricing model change by software provider WiseTech Global is an indication that the company’s flagship product has reached a level of market penetration that many technology companies can only dream of. There’s a saying in technology circles that software companies want their products to be so successful that everyone grumbles about them. That scenario generally only occurs when a product is so ubiquitous that it’s hard to envision an industry using anything else. CargoWise occupies that place in the world of forwarding. Simply put, most forwarders of any size and scale are using CargoWise for something, whether it be back-office accounting, transportation management, trade compliance or some mix of all three. By some estimates, CargoWise has as much as a 70% share of the forwarding software market, dwarfing the market share that even the largest forwarder, DSV (a current CargoWise customer) has over the logistics industry. Which means that WiseTech Global, with a $16 billion market capitalization, has a more dominant position in its market than its largest customer — with a $60 billion market cap – has in its market. That explains, in part, why something as seemingly banal as a change in the way WiseTech prices its product has created such a furor. Over the past three decades, a small software provider to Australian forwarders has morphed into a global technology powerhouse, a brand everyone loves to hate, because so many people must use its products. WiseTech’s fortress is, in part, built around a string of acquisitions of country-specific customs software vendors it made over the past dozen years. Those acquisitions give WiseTech direct connections to customs authorities that its competitors mostly lack, allowing its customers to remain compliant in a range of export and import markets. The importance of this network of customs capabilities can’t be understated — without it, forwarders struggle to help their customers clear regulatory authorities in key markets. That, along with general ledger and accounting functions upon which many forwarders base their operations, creates a scenario that makes it difficult for forwarders to switch to other solutions. As one forwarder put it to the Journal of Commerce: “It would be like ripping out a person’s circulatory system while the person was still alive.” No meaningful competition There is more to WiseTech’s dominance than its own ascent. A number of forwarding software vendors have, over the years, had designs encroaching on WiseTech’s turf. The list is not long, but it includes more than a dozen names, from sizable incumbent rivals such as Descartes, Softlink and Magaya, to upstarts that emerged in the past decade, including GoFreight and NewAge, to even newer entrants such as FreightSuite and Clear.ai. In addition, there are a number of regional providers that tend to focus on forwarders in their geographic market, most notably Riege in Germany. All of those providers collectively have failed to alter WiseTech’s trajectory, even as concerns grew from customers over WiseTech’s annual price increases and its sluggishness in integrating the products from its acquisitions. A new dimension to those concerns arose this past May when WiseTech made its biggest ever acquisition , a $2.1 billion deal for E2open, a logistics software vendor that catered primarily to shippers. That enabled WiseTech to offer products directly to the customers of its core CargoWise users. Coupled with the upheaval from the pricing change, and an expectation from most CargoWise customers that the new pricing model would raise technology costs above the normal annual price increases, fully leveraging E2open would seemingly force forwarders to reconsider their use of CargoWise, if that is truly an option. For many, it won’t be. And so, if the anger around the pricing change model eventually passes without a wholesale loss of its customer base, that will be a sign that WiseTech has indeed reached escape velocity, and that the forwarding world is more dependent on the software provider than it had believed. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com .

CargoWise’s pricing model change could mark final milestone in market ascent

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The carrier this week said a new service it is launching is “designed to enhance reliability and significantly improve transit times” between US Gulf ports, Central America and the Caribbean.</div>

The carrier this week said a new service it is launching is “designed to enhance reliability and significantly improve transit times” between US Gulf ports, Central America and the Caribbean.

<div class="phx-topic">Seaboard Marine is revamping its US Gulf Coast network to consolidate port calls on its short-sea services. The move comes as US trade with Central America remains elevated but flat since 2022 and faces new changes under the Trump administration. Seaboard this week said that it will launch a new Gulf service “designed to enhance reliability and significantly improve transit times” between US Gulf ports, Central America and the Caribbean. The new service’s rotation includes Houston and New Orleans, while its southern rotation includes Honduras, Guatemala, Kingston, Colombia, Panama and Costa Rica. Seaboard already offered two services from Houston to northern and southern Central America, a separate service between Houston and Kingston and a Central America service from New Orleans, according to its last service guide. Seaboard did not respond to a request for comment about whether the new service affects the other services. <h3>CAFTA play </h3>The new Gulf service largely covers countries under the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which was implemented beginning in 2006 and updated in 2009 to include the Dominican Republic. The trade pact initially lowered tariffs on US exports to the participating nations, with further reductions throughout the course of the agreement. US exports to CAFTA-DR countries peaked at $4.6 billion in June 2022 and were at $4.4 billion this past March, when US imports from member countries hit a new high of $3.8 billion, according to Census Bureau data. The Trump administration this year included CAFTA members on the list of countries hit by the 10% reciprocal tariffs announced in April, with exemptions made for goods covered under CAFTA. Most of those countries negotiated subsequent deals as of November to avoid the new tariffs. Nicaragua, however, faces the loss of its CAFTA exemptions over the next two years due to a US Trade Representative action citing the country’s human rights and labor policies. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Seaboard Marine is revamping its US Gulf Coast network to consolidate port calls on its short-sea services. The move comes as US trade with Central America remains elevated but flat since 2022 and faces new changes under the Trump administration. Seaboard this week said that it will launch a new Gulf service “designed to enhance reliability and significantly improve transit times” between US Gulf ports, Central America and the Caribbean. The new service’s rotation includes Houston and New Orleans, while its southern rotation includes Honduras, Guatemala, Kingston, Colombia, Panama and Costa Rica. Seaboard already offered two services from Houston to northern and southern Central America, a separate service between Houston and Kingston and a Central America service from New Orleans, according to its last service guide. Seaboard did not respond to a request for comment about whether the new service affects the other services. CAFTA play The new Gulf service largely covers countries under the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which was implemented beginning in 2006 and updated in 2009 to include the Dominican Republic. The trade pact initially lowered tariffs on US exports to the participating nations, with further reductions throughout the course of the agreement. US exports to CAFTA-DR countries peaked at $4.6 billion in June 2022 and were at $4.4 billion this past March, when US imports from member countries hit a new high of $3.8 billion, according to Census Bureau data. The Trump administration this year included CAFTA members on the list of countries hit by the 10% reciprocal tariffs announced in April, with exemptions made for goods covered under CAFTA. Most of those countries negotiated subsequent deals as of November to avoid the new tariffs. Nicaragua, however, faces the loss of its CAFTA exemptions over the next two years due to a US Trade Representative action citing the country’s human rights and labor policies. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

Seaboard Marine revamps Gulf service to combine calls in Central America

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">New analysis shows a systematic displacement of tonnage from primary to secondary trade lanes has occurred over the past two years, while a shortage of capacity is looming over the smaller shipping segment. </div>

New analysis shows a systematic displacement of tonnage from primary to secondary trade lanes has occurred over the past two years, while a shortage of capacity is looming over the smaller shipping segment.

<div class="phx-topic">The massive injection of larger vessels into the Asia-Europe and Asia-Mediterranean trades over the past two years has pushed smaller vessels into the trans-Atlantic and Latin America corridors, spreading structural overcapacity to secondary lanes. However, despite more than 1.7 million TEUs of new tonnage set to be delivered in 2026, mostly in the 15,000-to-24,000-TEU range, there is a growing mismatch in terms of the size of ships needed, with vessels in the sub-5,000-TEU segment — the backbone of intra-regional and feeder networks — aging rapidly, according to new analysis. A systematic displacement of tonnage from primary to secondary trade lanes over the past two years was driven by extreme outward pressure from the Red Sea diversions, drought in the Panama Canal and the reshuffling of alliances in the first half of 2025, according to Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis. “To maintain weekly service frequency while navigating the longer sailing distances on Asia-Europe, carriers were forced to inject significant additional tonnage into Asia-North Europe,” Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, wrote in this week’s Sunday Spotlight newsletter. The injection of so much capacity triggered a massive downstream effect. As carriers introduced new 24,000-TEU vessels into the extended North Europe services, the existing 14,000-to-20,000-TEU vessels were cascaded directly into the Asia-Mediterranean trade lane. In the trans-Pacific, the capacity management on the Asia-North America West and East coast trades through 2024 was operational in nature as carriers shuffled tonnage between the two trade lanes to mitigate Panama Canal draft restrictions, US port labor disruptions and the after-effects of the pandemic-induced volatility. The net effect was high movement of ships but not much change in capacity. In February of this year, the launch of new alliance structures — Gemini Cooperation, Premier Alliance and Mediterranean Shipping Co. as a standalone venture — provided the catalyst for a massive network shakeup, Sea-Intelligence noted. Carriers broke up established service loops and repositioned vessels globally to fit the new service networks. Volatile demand on Asia-North America West Coast saw a net reduction of 427,432 TEUs in the first half of 2025 as carriers blanked sailings to try to support rates, Murphy noted in the Sunday Spotlight. At the same time, the rapid growth on Asia-Mediterranean subsided, with Murphy surmising that after 18 months of absorbing cascaded tonnage from Asia-North Europe, the trade lane had likely reached a saturation point. In the first half of this year, the net capacity growth into Asia-Mediterranean decelerated by 79% compared with 2024. <h3>Steady operational state </h3>By the second half of 2025, the new alliance networks had reached a relatively steady operational state with the Mediterranean-North America East Coast trade lane emerging as a key cascading corridor, absorbing 127,686 TEUs in the second half, with most of that capacity from the Asia-Mediterranean trade, the Sunday Spotlight noted. A total of 14 vessels were shifted in the second half, 11 of those of 14,000 to 15,000 TEUs. Asia-East Coast South America (ECSA) was the next biggest net gainer in the second half, absorbing 112,998 TEUs. Most of that was from the two Asia-North America trade lanes that cascaded a combined 283,946 TEUs. A total of 32 vessels were shifted, with 72% of them in the 8,000- to 14,000-TEU segment. But Murphy noted that the nature of the growth in capacity was fundamentally different from the previous year, with 97% of the vessels entering the Asia-East Coast South America trade taking up permanent employment there and not being returned to their previous routes. “This meant that Asia-ECSA became a seemingly preferred destination for mid-size tonnage of 8,000-14,000 TEU vessels that had been cycled out of the main east-west trade lanes,” he said. As the dust settles from the alliance reshuffling of capacity, new analysis from consultancy MDS Transmodal notes that should carriers return to large-scale Red Sea transits, it will expose the imbalance that has built up in the global fleet over the past few years. “While much of the industry has focused on the temporary capacity absorption created by rerouting around Africa, the underlying fundamentals point to something far more persistent: a container fleet that is oversupplied at the top end but increasingly shrinking at the bottom,” Antonella Teodoro, senior consultant at MDS Transmodal, noted in her analysis titled The Post-Red Sea Fleet Paradox: Oversupply at the Top, Shortages at the Bottom. “As diversions unwind and new ships continue to arrive, the industry faces two very different capacity problems — one defined by excess, the other by scarcity,” Teodoro said. <h3>Small ships crucial to regional segment </h3>In 2025, the capacity ordered in the 10,000-to-20,000-TEU bracket was 1.6 million TEUs and the ships greater than 20,000 TEUs comprised 1.3 million TEUs. By contrast, in the less-than-5,000-TEU segment, the 2025 order book was at 442,182 TEUs, according to Sea-web, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global. Teodoro said the sub-5,000-TEU segment was crucial for the intra-regional and feeder networks, but more than 60% of the vessels were at least 25 years old or older, making them prime scrapping candidates. Yet the order book in these size categories was almost non-existent. “By 2030, the global fleet below 2,500 TEUs could contract by 40% to 80%, with the 500-to-999-TEU category almost disappearing entirely,” she said. “This matters because many port systems depend on these vessels in a way that cannot be substituted ... by larger tonnage, regardless of how cheap or abundant it becomes.” <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="5ea90874-1017-4ee9-a80c-de2dfc51d88b"></dynamic-object></div>Alphaliner shipping analyst Mael Pape-Léostic said there are 593 vessels in the sub-5,000-TEU bracket that are 25 years old or older out of 4,473 ships currently trading — 13% of the fleet. In the sub-2,500-TEU segment, 17% of the trading fleet is 25 years old or older. “After a first wave of orders mainly focusing on large ships, we saw carriers this year in particular ordering smaller units with a high interest for specific classes like Bangkokmax [1,700-1,900 TEUs] and Chittagongmax [2,800 TEUs],” Pape-Léostic told the Journal of Commerce. “The ships of smaller segments of the market are aging, but it seems that carriers and non-operating owners are now in the process of rejuvenating this fleet after having focused on mainliners,” he added. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

The massive injection of larger vessels into the Asia-Europe and Asia-Mediterranean trades over the past two years has pushed smaller vessels into the trans-Atlantic and Latin America corridors, spreading structural overcapacity to secondary lanes. However, despite more than 1.7 million TEUs of new tonnage set to be delivered in 2026, mostly in the 15,000-to-24,000-TEU range, there is a growing mismatch in terms of the size of ships needed, with vessels in the sub-5,000-TEU segment — the backbone of intra-regional and feeder networks — aging rapidly, according to new analysis. A systematic displacement of tonnage from primary to secondary trade lanes over the past two years was driven by extreme outward pressure from the Red Sea diversions, drought in the Panama Canal and the reshuffling of alliances in the first half of 2025, according to Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis. “To maintain weekly service frequency while navigating the longer sailing distances on Asia-Europe, carriers were forced to inject significant additional tonnage into Asia-North Europe,” Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, wrote in this week’s Sunday Spotlight newsletter. The injection of so much capacity triggered a massive downstream effect. As carriers introduced new 24,000-TEU vessels into the extended North Europe services, the existing 14,000-to-20,000-TEU vessels were cascaded directly into the Asia-Mediterranean trade lane. In the trans-Pacific, the capacity management on the Asia-North America West and East coast trades through 2024 was operational in nature as carriers shuffled tonnage between the two trade lanes to mitigate Panama Canal draft restrictions, US port labor disruptions and the after-effects of the pandemic-induced volatility. The net effect was high movement of ships but not much change in capacity. In February of this year, the launch of new alliance structures — Gemini Cooperation, Premier Alliance and Mediterranean Shipping Co. as a standalone venture — provided the catalyst for a massive network shakeup, Sea-Intelligence noted. Carriers broke up established service loops and repositioned vessels globally to fit the new service networks. Volatile demand on Asia-North America West Coast saw a net reduction of 427,432 TEUs in the first half of 2025 as carriers blanked sailings to try to support rates, Murphy noted in the Sunday Spotlight. At the same time, the rapid growth on Asia-Mediterranean subsided, with Murphy surmising that after 18 months of absorbing cascaded tonnage from Asia-North Europe, the trade lane had likely reached a saturation point. In the first half of this year, the net capacity growth into Asia-Mediterranean decelerated by 79% compared with 2024. Steady operational state By the second half of 2025, the new alliance networks had reached a relatively steady operational state with the Mediterranean-North America East Coast trade lane emerging as a key cascading corridor, absorbing 127,686 TEUs in the second half, with most of that capacity from the Asia-Mediterranean trade, the Sunday Spotlight noted. A total of 14 vessels were shifted in the second half, 11 of those of 14,000 to 15,000 TEUs. Asia-East Coast South America (ECSA) was the next biggest net gainer in the second half, absorbing 112,998 TEUs. Most of that was from the two Asia-North America trade lanes that cascaded a combined 283,946 TEUs. A total of 32 vessels were shifted, with 72% of them in the 8,000- to 14,000-TEU segment. But Murphy noted that the nature of the growth in capacity was fundamentally different from the previous year, with 97% of the vessels entering the Asia-East Coast South America trade taking up permanent employment there and not being returned to their previous routes. “This meant that Asia-ECSA became a seemingly preferred destination for mid-size tonnage of 8,000-14,000 TEU vessels that had been cycled out of the main east-west trade lanes,” he said. As the dust settles from the alliance reshuffling of capacity, new analysis from consultancy MDS Transmodal notes that should carriers return to large-scale Red Sea transits, it will expose the imbalance that has built up in the global fleet over the past few years. “While much of the industry has focused on the temporary capacity absorption created by rerouting around Africa, the underlying fundamentals point to something far more persistent: a container fleet that is oversupplied at the top end but increasingly shrinking at the bottom,” Antonella Teodoro, senior consultant at MDS Transmodal, noted in her analysis titled The Post-Red Sea Fleet Paradox: Oversupply at the Top, Shortages at the Bottom. “As diversions unwind and new ships continue to arrive, the industry faces two very different capacity problems — one defined by excess, the other by scarcity,” Teodoro said. Small ships crucial to regional segment In 2025, the capacity ordered in the 10,000-to-20,000-TEU bracket was 1.6 million TEUs and the ships greater than 20,000 TEUs comprised 1.3 million TEUs. By contrast, in the less-than-5,000-TEU segment, the 2025 order book was at 442,182 TEUs, according to Sea-web, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global. Teodoro said the sub-5,000-TEU segment was crucial for the intra-regional and feeder networks, but more than 60% of the vessels were at least 25 years old or older, making them prime scrapping candidates. Yet the order book in these size categories was almost non-existent. “By 2030, the global fleet below 2,500 TEUs could contract by 40% to 80%, with the 500-to-999-TEU category almost disappearing entirely,” she said. “This matters because many port systems depend on these vessels in a way that cannot be substituted ... by larger tonnage, regardless of how cheap or abundant it becomes.” Alphaliner shipping analyst Mael Pape-Léostic said there are 593 vessels in the sub-5,000-TEU bracket that are 25 years old or older out of 4,473 ships currently trading — 13% of the fleet. In the sub-2,500-TEU segment, 17% of the trading fleet is 25 years old or older. “After a first wave of orders mainly focusing on large ships, we saw carriers this year in particular ordering smaller units with a high interest for specific classes like Bangkokmax [1,700-1,900 TEUs] and Chittagongmax [2,800 TEUs],” Pape-Léostic told the Journal of Commerce. “The ships of smaller segments of the market are aging, but it seems that carriers and non-operating owners are now in the process of rejuvenating this fleet after having focused on mainliners,” he added. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Cascading container tonnage spreads structural overcapacity to secondary lanes

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A study commissioned by Freightos finds truckload shippers fail to use 70% of the contracted capacity they negotiate.</div>

A study commissioned by Freightos finds truckload shippers fail to use 70% of the contracted capacity they negotiate.

<div class="phx-topic">Shippers rely too heavily on freight contracts in ocean and truckload procurement events while not utilizing all the space for which they contract, according to research commissioned by online freight marketplace Freightos. The study, conducted this fall by Angi Acocella, a freight lab researcher at MIT’s Center for Transportation and Logistics, found that while most shippers commit at least 90% of their forecast truckload volume to contracts, as much as 70% of that contracted capacity goes unused. The research also found that more than 70% of ocean freight is typically dedicated to contract, but didn’t have a comparable unused capacity metric. Most shippers believe they only “ghost” no more than 25% of their contracted capacity in ocean and truckload, Acocella found, adding that most shippers admit during in-person discussions that they estimate this number. She referred to this phenomenon, where capacity exists but the load doesn’t materialize, as ghost lanes. “There are real costs and performance implications for having ghost lanes,” Acocella said in the study. The research found evidence that truckload shippers are using the spot market in a more strategic way in full truckload. Pre-COVID, about 5% of truckload volume went directly to the spot market. That pertains specifically to loads that didn’t encounter what she called a “routing guide failure,” where a load is rejected by a shipper’s contract carrier and by the backup carriers in its routing guide, but rather was tendered directly to the spot market. That number rose to 10% during the pandemic and stayed at that level post-pandemic. “It looks like there may be a structural shift in how shippers are accessing the spot market,” Acocella said, noting that COVID-19 influenced an increase in spot market loads even to carriers within a shipper’s routing guide. “Despite a soft market [which would normally indicate shippers’ increasing use of contracted capacity], that number has stayed at 10%.” She said a majority of shippers want to move via contract “because it’s predictable and what they can plan for,” even if shippers ought to be using a broader mix of strategic spot capacity alongside long-term, short-term and index-linked contract space. <h3>Strategic use vs. desperation move </h3>Shippers forced from contract onto the truckload spot market are paying 9% to 35% more for freight above their forecast costs, Acocella said, alluding to the use of spot market out of desperation rather than as part of a procurement diversification strategy. The study was based on data from 108 shipper and carrier respondents in ocean trade, and 60 in truckload. “Shippers carry significant wasted costs through unused or underutilized contracts, with analysis showing better efficiency via the strategic use of spot for these lanes,” Judah Levine, Freightos’ head of research, wrote in a Dec. 4 blog about the research. Levine said the findings suggest shippers should measure the ratio and relative performance of contract versus spot freight. He also said shippers should consider index-linked contracts within their broader use of contracts, weigh the use of spot market tools, and automate time-consuming procurement tasks such as requesting tender offers, spot rates and even bookings. Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Shippers rely too heavily on freight contracts in ocean and truckload procurement events while not utilizing all the space for which they contract, according to research commissioned by online freight marketplace Freightos. The study, conducted this fall by Angi Acocella, a freight lab researcher at MIT’s Center for Transportation and Logistics, found that while most shippers commit at least 90% of their forecast truckload volume to contracts, as much as 70% of that contracted capacity goes unused. The research also found that more than 70% of ocean freight is typically dedicated to contract, but didn’t have a comparable unused capacity metric. Most shippers believe they only “ghost” no more than 25% of their contracted capacity in ocean and truckload, Acocella found, adding that most shippers admit during in-person discussions that they estimate this number. She referred to this phenomenon, where capacity exists but the load doesn’t materialize, as ghost lanes. “There are real costs and performance implications for having ghost lanes,” Acocella said in the study. The research found evidence that truckload shippers are using the spot market in a more strategic way in full truckload. Pre-COVID, about 5% of truckload volume went directly to the spot market. That pertains specifically to loads that didn’t encounter what she called a “routing guide failure,” where a load is rejected by a shipper’s contract carrier and by the backup carriers in its routing guide, but rather was tendered directly to the spot market. That number rose to 10% during the pandemic and stayed at that level post-pandemic. “It looks like there may be a structural shift in how shippers are accessing the spot market,” Acocella said, noting that COVID-19 influenced an increase in spot market loads even to carriers within a shipper’s routing guide. “Despite a soft market [which would normally indicate shippers’ increasing use of contracted capacity], that number has stayed at 10%.” She said a majority of shippers want to move via contract “because it’s predictable and what they can plan for,” even if shippers ought to be using a broader mix of strategic spot capacity alongside long-term, short-term and index-linked contract space. Strategic use vs. desperation move Shippers forced from contract onto the truckload spot market are paying 9% to 35% more for freight above their forecast costs, Acocella said, alluding to the use of spot market out of desperation rather than as part of a procurement diversification strategy. The study was based on data from 108 shipper and carrier respondents in ocean trade, and 60 in truckload. “Shippers carry significant wasted costs through unused or underutilized contracts, with analysis showing better efficiency via the strategic use of spot for these lanes,” Judah Levine, Freightos’ head of research, wrote in a Dec. 4 blog about the research. Levine said the findings suggest shippers should measure the ratio and relative performance of contract versus spot freight. He also said shippers should consider index-linked contracts within their broader use of contracts, weigh the use of spot market tools, and automate time-consuming procurement tasks such as requesting tender offers, spot rates and even bookings. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com .

Reliance on contracts results in unused truckload, ocean capacity: study

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">S&amp;P Global’s outlook for the transportation sector sees US ports facing a volume decline in 2026 with the potential for recovery in 2027. </div>

S&P Global’s outlook for the transportation sector sees US ports facing a volume decline in 2026 with the potential for recovery in 2027.

<div class="phx-topic">US ports face another down year for volumes in 2026 due to ongoing uncertainty over the direction of US trade and tariff policy, according to an S&amp;P Global credit outlook. The forecast drop in container volumes echoes similar outlooks from major US port operators whose fortunes are not expected to turn around until 2027. S&amp;P Global Ratings said Tuesday that while US economic output and employment are expected to remain stable through next year, ports face a down year as the Trump administration’s wide-ranging tariffs against most US trade partners likely make shippers cautious and continue to reshore production. Trade with China might stabilize in 2026 due to <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/trade-deal-could-boost-short-term-china-imports-but-uncertainty-lingers-6106809">the trade deal the US struck with China through next November</a>, S&amp;P Global Ratings said. But tariffs against China and other trading partners remain at record high levels, forcing shippers to be cautious. A US Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s tariffs could reignite cargo shipments, the outlook said. Nevertheless, S&amp;P Global said US port container volumes will decline 2% in 2026. The outlook calls for a rebound in volume of 6% in 2027 on the hopes of a more stable trade policy. The outlook did not include actual volume figures. “US ports face the greatest uncertainty due to the evolving tariff landscape in 2026,” S&amp;P Global Ratings said. “The recently negotiated truce in the US-China trade conflict provides a measure of certainty until that agreement expires. Our estimate of slightly lower container volumes in 2026 is followed by a solid recovery in 2027.” The outlook follows a similar forecast from the National Retail Federation (NRF), which said Monday <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/december-us-imports-on-track-to-be-lowest-since-june-23-retailers-6130632">first-quarter 2026 port volumes could see double-digit declines from the year earlier</a>. Overall, the NRF expects 2025 volumes to come in slightly below 2024. Credit ratings agency Moody’s on Nov. 18 warned that US import volumes in 2026 will be flat to down 2% from this year. Port operators, too, are budgeting for declines or only slow growth in 2026. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said in November it’s budgeting for total container volumes of 8.5 million TEUs in 2026, which would be just over a 2% decline from 2024. Since 2016, NY-NJ port container volumes have grown at an annual average of 4.2%. Port Houston Authority also said last month it’s budgeting for container volumes to reach 4.4 million TEUs in 2026, which would represent growth of 4.7%, below the port’s decade-long average volume growth of 7%. S&amp;P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

US ports face another down year for volumes in 2026 due to ongoing uncertainty over the direction of US trade and tariff policy, according to an S&P Global credit outlook. The forecast drop in container volumes echoes similar outlooks from major US port operators whose fortunes are not expected to turn around until 2027. S&P Global Ratings said Tuesday that while US economic output and employment are expected to remain stable through next year, ports face a down year as the Trump administration’s wide-ranging tariffs against most US trade partners likely make shippers cautious and continue to reshore production. Trade with China might stabilize in 2026 due to the trade deal the US struck with China through next November , S&P Global Ratings said. But tariffs against China and other trading partners remain at record high levels, forcing shippers to be cautious. A US Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s tariffs could reignite cargo shipments, the outlook said. Nevertheless, S&P Global said US port container volumes will decline 2% in 2026. The outlook calls for a rebound in volume of 6% in 2027 on the hopes of a more stable trade policy. The outlook did not include actual volume figures. “US ports face the greatest uncertainty due to the evolving tariff landscape in 2026,” S&P Global Ratings said. “The recently negotiated truce in the US-China trade conflict provides a measure of certainty until that agreement expires. Our estimate of slightly lower container volumes in 2026 is followed by a solid recovery in 2027.” The outlook follows a similar forecast from the National Retail Federation (NRF), which said Monday first-quarter 2026 port volumes could see double-digit declines from the year earlier . Overall, the NRF expects 2025 volumes to come in slightly below 2024. Credit ratings agency Moody’s on Nov. 18 warned that US import volumes in 2026 will be flat to down 2% from this year. Port operators, too, are budgeting for declines or only slow growth in 2026. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said in November it’s budgeting for total container volumes of 8.5 million TEUs in 2026, which would be just over a 2% decline from 2024. Since 2016, NY-NJ port container volumes have grown at an annual average of 4.2%. Port Houston Authority also said last month it’s budgeting for container volumes to reach 4.4 million TEUs in 2026, which would represent growth of 4.7%, below the port’s decade-long average volume growth of 7%. S&P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

US container volumes set for weak 2026 amid ongoing trade uncertainty

Use code GTW595 at checkout and save $900 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Use code SSW30 at checkout to save 30% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - FT to S/SP - Wide Box

SEASON"S SAVINGS

Subscribe today using code SSW30 at checkout and save 30% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to S/SP - Wide Box

SEASON'S SAVINGS

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code SSW995 at checkout to save $500 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - FT to Gold - Wide Box

Get into a Gold subscription today and save $500 by using code SSW995 at checkout!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to Gold - Wide Box

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

SEASON'S SAVINGS: Use code SSW30 to save 30% on first year of a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - FT to S/SP - Offer Box

Subscribe and Save

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

SEASON'S SAVINGS: Subscribe today using code SSW30 at checkout and save 30% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to S/SP - Offer Box

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW595 at checkout and save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SEASON'S SAVINGS: Get into a Gold subscription today and save $500 by using code SSW995 at checkout!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to Gold - Offer Box

SEASON'S SAVINGS: Use code SSW995 at checkout to save $500 on a Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - FT to Gold - Offer Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

The premier conference for the global container shipping and supply chain community

TPM Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend TPM26

The only editorially independent conference for the breakbulk & project cargo industry

Latest News

More News & Analysis

CargoWise’s pricing model change could mark final milestone in market ascent

Seaboard Marine revamps Gulf service to combine calls in Central America

Cascading container tonnage spreads structural overcapacity to secondary lanes