<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The reopening of the US and European economies after last year’s COVID-19 lockdowns spurred a resurgence in the trans-Atlantic container trade as business activity in two of the world’s largest economies showed better than expected growth in May.</div>

The reopening of the US and European economies after last year’s COVID-19 lockdowns spurred a resurgence in the trans-Atlantic container trade as business activity in two of the world’s largest economies showed better than expected growth in May.

<div><div><img>Westbound trans-Atlantic trade rose 10 percent in the first five months of 2021, while eastbound volumes ticked up 2.6 percent. Photo credit: Shutterstock.com.</div>The reopening of the US and European economies after last year’s COVID-19 lockdowns spurred a resurgence in the trans-Atlantic container trade as business activity in two of the world’s largest economies showed better-than-expected growth in May.Total containerized volume between the US and Europe rose 7.4 percent in the first five months of 2021 compared with the same period a year ago, with increases concentrated at US ports that have recently undergone major expansions, according to PIERS, a sister...

Westbound trans-Atlantic trade rose 10 percent in the first five months of 2021, while eastbound volumes ticked up 2.6 percent. Photo credit: Shutterstock.com. The reopening of the US and European economies after last year’s COVID-19 lockdowns spurred a resurgence in the trans-Atlantic container trade as business activity in two of the world’s largest economies showed better-than-expected growth in May. Total containerized volume between the US and Europe rose 7.4 percent in the first five months of 2021 compared with the same period a year ago, with increases concentrated at US ports that have recently undergone major expansions, according to PIERS, a sister company of JOC.com within IHS Markit. That growth has now offset most of the 7.9 percent year-over-year drop in trans-Atlantic trade in the first five months of 2020 as both economies reeled from the effects of initial pandemic lockdowns. Headhaul volumes from Europe and the Mediterranean to the US drove the recovery, rising 10 percent year over year to nearly 1.5 million TEU in the first five months of 2021, while eastbound shipments ticked up 2.6 percent to 732,618 TEU. US imports from Europe hit an all-time single-month record of 328,627 TEU in April, a 14.7 percent increase from a year earlier. May imports reached 316,687 TEU, a 26.4 percent gain from the same month last year. Rising volumes lift rates Click to enlarge . The April–May volume surge was accompanied by a dramatic increase in westbound trans-Atlantic spot ocean freight rates. Between April 1 and mid-July, short-term Europe–US rates on contracts of 32 days or less skyrocketed 232 percent to $5,1767 per FEU, according to data from rate benchmarking platform Xeneta. Long-term rates on contracts of 88 days or more increased 72 percent to $1,995 per FEU over the same six-week period. With demand increasing and capacity tightening, carrier rate increases are further supported by growing equipment shortages in Europe as port congestion and inland logistics delays lengthen turnaround times for containers. Forwarders are also reporting carriers charging premiums on top of the high rates to guarantee space, a practice that has become commonplace in the trans-Pacific trade but mostly has been avoided in the trans-Atlantic. Chris Williamson, chief business economist with IHS Markit, attributed the rapid rebound to record economic growth in the US and certain European countries. IHS Markit’s flash Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for the US reached 68.1 in May, a record expansion, and the UK set a similar record with a PMI reading of 62. The Eurozone as a whole saw the fastest growth since February 2018 with a May PMI of 56.9, with differing economic growth rates among EU countries attributed to COVID-19 vaccination rates and resulting restrictions — or relative lack thereof. “The underperformance of the Eurozone relative to the US and UK can be in part attributable to variances in ongoing measures to control the spread of COVID-19, but also to vaccination progress. While the UK and US have so far respectively vaccinated 54 percent and 47 percent of their populations to some degree … vaccination rates range from 38 percent to 32 percent in the four largest Eurozone economies,” Williamson said in a May PMI update. The June PMI readings show economic growth slowing in both the US and the UK, according to Williamson. Building for growth Click to enlarge . For US ports, growth in imports from Europe was relatively widespread, with Oakland the only port in the JOC Top 10 Trans-Atlantic Ports to register a decline during the first five months of 2021. The gateways that recorded the largest growth from January through May — the ports of Virginia (up 34.1 percent), Savannah (up 18.9 percent), and Charleston (up 13.8 percent) — all finished major expansion projects in late 2019 or 2020. The Port of Virginia, which saw its share of inbound trans-Atlantic volumes rise to 13.1 percent from 10.2 percent a year earlier, in mid-2020 completed the installation of 86 semi-automated gantry cranes at Norfolk International Terminals (NIT) and Virginia International Gateway. The $375 million NIT expansion, which officially broke ground in January 2018, brought the terminal’s annual handling capacity to 2.2 million TEU and allowed it to service vessels with up to 18,000 TEU in capacity. A project at the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal that was completed in fall 2019 added three new berths to the facility, allowing it to service three 14,000-TEU ships simultaneously. And the Port of Charleston in early 2020 added three new cranes to its Wando Welch terminal, which can service vessels up to 14,000 TEU. The Port of New York and New Jersey , which saw inbound trans-Atlantic volumes rise 5 percent year over year for the period, remained the top destination for European goods despite its share of the import market slipping from 32 percent in the first five months of 2020 to 30.5 percent this year. Mediterranean Shipping Co. (MSC) also maintained its position as the top carrier in the westbound trans-Atlantic trade, recording the highest year-over-year growth rate of any of the largest carriers in the trade. A 27.7 percent jump in volume during the first five months of 2021 increased the Geneva-based line’s market share to 31.6 percent from 27.2 percent last year. Other carriers that registered double-digit percentage growth in US imports from Europe include Yang Ming (up 19.7 percent), Independent Container Line (up 18.3 percent), and ACL/Grimaldi Group (up 12.7 percent). Rankings compiled by Marcin Lejik, data analyst. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@ihsmarkit.com and follow him on Twitter: @michael_angell . Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@ihsmarkit.com and follow him on Twitter: @greg_knowler . JOC Top 10 Container Lines by US Imports from Europe US IMPORTS FROM EUROPE, January–May 2021 vs. January–May 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 in laden TEU* The JOC Top 10 Container Lines in the westbound trans-Atlantic trade carried 97 percent of the nearly 1.44 million TEU in US imports from North Europe and the Mediterranean in the first five months of 2021, a volume increased of 10 percent year over year and 19.3 percent above 2017. 2021 Market Share January-May US IMPORTS 2018 2019 2020 2021 Percent Volume Change in 2021 From 2018 From 2019 From 2020 2021 Rank Carrier 1 MSC 31.6% 331,823 400,117 366,552 468,154 41.1% 17.0% 27.7% 2 Hapag-Lloyd 18.7% 266,375 292,419 284,396 276,707 3.9% -5.4% -2.7% 3 A.P. Møller - Maersk* 12.1% 195,148 206,379 169,165 178,965 -8.3% -13.3% 5.8% 4 CMA CGM/APL 9.7% 157,541 150,663 139,626 142,891 -9.3% -5.2% 2.3% 5 Ocean Network Express 7.2% 88,624 94,674 103,090 107,007 20.7% 13.0% 3.8% 6 Cosco Shipping/OOCL 7.0% 89,263 99,924 98,946 103,836 16.3% 3.9% 4.9% 7 ACL/Grimaldi Group 3.3% 39,474 41,727 43,727 49,266 24.8% 18.1% 12.7% 8 Independent Container Line 3.2% 40,884 43,033 39,832 47,121 15.3% 9.5% 18.3% 9 Yang Ming Marine 2.1% 28,041 28,228 25,799 30,881 10.1% 9.4% 19.7% 10 Evergreen Line 2.0% 34,550 35,849 33,899 30,136 -12.8% -15.9% -11.1% TOTAL JOC TOP 10 CARRIERS BY US IMPORTS FROM EUROPE 97.7% 1,271,722 1,393,013 1,305,031 1,434,965 12.8% 3.0% 10.0% TOTAL US IMPORTS FROM EUROPE 100.0% 1,326,230 1,437,127 1,345,220 1,479,288 11.5% 2.9% 10.0% MARKET SHARE OF JOC TOP 10 CARRIERS BY IMPORTS FROM EUROPE 95.9% 96.9% 97.0% 97.0% *A.P. Moeller - Maersk includes Maersk Line, Sealand, Safmarine and Hamburg Sud. Source: IHS Markit

Container lines

JOC Rankings: US, EU reopening spurs rebound in trans-Atlantic trade

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Despite significant injections of reefer capacity in early 2025, US cold chain stakeholders say they continue to face equipment scarcity issues.</div>

Despite significant injections of reefer capacity in early 2025, US cold chain stakeholders say they continue to face equipment scarcity issues.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">The production of refrigerated containers globally is at its highest level in at least a decade, but that hasn’t been enough to relieve reefer scarcity amid increased maintenance needs, retirement of older equipment, elevated demand on some regional trades and rising market volatility, US market stakeholders say. Figures prepared for the Journal of Commerce by maritime consultancy Drewry show 93,000 TEUs of reefer equipment entered the global market in the first quarter of 2025, up almost 145% from the same period of 2024. “On average, over the last 10 years, the industry has produced somewhere between 275,000 to 300,000 TEUs of reefer equipment annually,” said Bob Sappio, CEO of refrigerated container lessor SeaCube. “This year, we’re expecting there to be closer to 350,000 TEUs.” Nearly all reefer containers are produced by three Chinese companies: China International Marine Containers, Dong Fang International Containers and Guangdong FUWA Engineering Group Co. According to Sappio, the lead time for ordering new 40-foot reefer containers has doubled to about four months. Costs are also going up, as recent steel tariffs raise prices of any equipment purchases made in the US. <h3>A hot cold chain </h3>Extreme heat is one factor driving up equipment problems. Amanda Oren, vice president of industry strategy for grocery at supply chain planning company RELEX, said that they’ve seen more disruptions due to high temperatures. “The East Coast has been [extremely hot] ...” Oren told the Journal of Commerce. “It’s impacting the supply chain at large for refrigerated product.” According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 13 heat records were broken in the 30 days leading up to July 12, with another 14 heat records tied. Many of those were concentrated on the East Coast. A forwarder focused on temperature-controlled shipments told the Journal of Commerce that reefer equipment is put under more stress in high temperatures, and many locations won’t load a reefer until it’s cooled. “Cooling an empty container full of hot air is no easy task,” said the forwarder. “When the [equipment] is put under this kind of stress, any weak points can become fail points, and we see an uptick in maintenance issues and failures when we see temperatures like we have.” As maintenance needs are magnified by elevated temperatures, some aging equipment is already due for retirement, said Sappio. A significant portion of the global reefer fleet is 11 to 14 years old, he said, meaning it’s close to being withdrawn from service. <h3>US demand cooled in May </h3>The US moved record-setting reefer volumes last year, reaching a total of 467,700 TEUs, up 17% compared with 2023, according to PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp; P Global. This May, however, PIERS data shows US reefer exports at 56,254 TEUs, down nearly 20% compared with last year. Similarly, May reefer imports were down 5.4% on the year at 156,733 TEUs, the lowest monthly total since August 2023. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="4ef4b851-58b1-4fdd-b7c5-ad0e1717a1f9"></dynamic-object></div>Oren says tariffs are driving some shippers to diversify supply chains and re-source cargo, further contributing to instability. “We’re starting to see product being sourced that used to come from China looking at different sourcing options, like Southeast Asia or South Korea,” she said. Still, the global reefer market is predicted to grow about 2% annually through 2029, according to figures from Drewry shared during a reefer webinar last month. “The reefer trade is growing okay, but obviously there [are] some areas which are growing faster than others,” Philip Gray, Drewry’s senior associate of reefer shipping, said during the webinar. Oceania to Asia, Central America to North America and North Europe to Asia were the lanes with the most significant growth last year, according to the webinar. But the lack of predictability, sources say, is making it harder for carriers to accurately position equipment to meet the shifting demands of different trades. “Uncertainty and volatility are just going to be our companions, certainly for [the rest] of this year,” said Sappio. “It’s difficult under normal circumstances to accurately forecast, but under these circumstances, it’s nearly impossible.” Contact Laura Robb at <a href="mailto:Laura.Robb@spglobal.com">laura.robb@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

The production of refrigerated containers globally is at its highest level in at least a decade, but that hasn’t been enough to relieve reefer scarcity amid increased maintenance needs, retirement of older equipment, elevated demand on some regional trades and rising market volatility, US market stakeholders say. Figures prepared for the Journal of Commerce by maritime consultancy Drewry show 93,000 TEUs of reefer equipment entered the global market in the first quarter of 2025, up almost 145% from the same period of 2024. “On average, over the last 10 years, the industry has produced somewhere between 275,000 to 300,000 TEUs of reefer equipment annually,” said Bob Sappio, CEO of refrigerated container lessor SeaCube. “This year, we’re expecting there to be closer to 350,000 TEUs.” Nearly all reefer containers are produced by three Chinese companies: China International Marine Containers, Dong Fang International Containers and Guangdong FUWA Engineering Group Co. According to Sappio, the lead time for ordering new 40-foot reefer containers has doubled to about four months. Costs are also going up, as recent steel tariffs raise prices of any equipment purchases made in the US. A hot cold chain Extreme heat is one factor driving up equipment problems. Amanda Oren, vice president of industry strategy for grocery at supply chain planning company RELEX, said that they’ve seen more disruptions due to high temperatures. “The East Coast has been [extremely hot] ...” Oren told the Journal of Commerce. “It’s impacting the supply chain at large for refrigerated product.” According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 13 heat records were broken in the 30 days leading up to July 12, with another 14 heat records tied. Many of those were concentrated on the East Coast. A forwarder focused on temperature-controlled shipments told the Journal of Commerce that reefer equipment is put under more stress in high temperatures, and many locations won’t load a reefer until it’s cooled. “Cooling an empty container full of hot air is no easy task,” said the forwarder. “When the [equipment] is put under this kind of stress, any weak points can become fail points, and we see an uptick in maintenance issues and failures when we see temperatures like we have.” As maintenance needs are magnified by elevated temperatures, some aging equipment is already due for retirement, said Sappio. A significant portion of the global reefer fleet is 11 to 14 years old, he said, meaning it’s close to being withdrawn from service. US demand cooled in May The US moved record-setting reefer volumes last year, reaching a total of 467,700 TEUs, up 17% compared with 2023, according to PIERS, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S& P Global. This May, however, PIERS data shows US reefer exports at 56,254 TEUs, down nearly 20% compared with last year. Similarly, May reefer imports were down 5.4% on the year at 156,733 TEUs, the lowest monthly total since August 2023. Oren says tariffs are driving some shippers to diversify supply chains and re-source cargo, further contributing to instability. “We’re starting to see product being sourced that used to come from China looking at different sourcing options, like Southeast Asia or South Korea,” she said. Still, the global reefer market is predicted to grow about 2% annually through 2029, according to figures from Drewry shared during a reefer webinar last month. “The reefer trade is growing okay, but obviously there [are] some areas which are growing faster than others,” Philip Gray, Drewry’s senior associate of reefer shipping, said during the webinar. Oceania to Asia, Central America to North America and North Europe to Asia were the lanes with the most significant growth last year, according to the webinar. But the lack of predictability, sources say, is making it harder for carriers to accurately position equipment to meet the shifting demands of different trades. “Uncertainty and volatility are just going to be our companions, certainly for [the rest] of this year,” said Sappio. “It’s difficult under normal circumstances to accurately forecast, but under these circumstances, it’s nearly impossible.” Contact Laura Robb at laura.robb@spglobal.com .

Maritime

Container Shipping News

Trans-Pacific

Cool Cargo News

Reefer fleet growth yet to show in availability of equipment

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A bill reintroduced in the House of Representatives would require customs fees to be directed to covering building and other capital costs related to inspections. </div>

A bill reintroduced in the House of Representatives would require customs fees to be directed to covering building and other capital costs related to inspections.

<div class="phx-topic">US ports and shippers are asking Congress to rein in the costs of customs inspections at local ports of entry, throwing their support behind legislation that would require processing fees to cover expenses related to inspection facilities. In a letter sent last week to six of the bill’s original co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and 26 other groups asked for renewed support of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Space Act (Securing Ports and America’s Commerce and Economy). First introduced last year, two of the original co-sponsors, Florida Rep. Laurel Lee and Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp, plan to bring the bill before Congress again this term. The CBP Space Act would require that the merchandise processing fee, which is based on the value of goods imported and can range between $32 and $634, would also cover any capital costs for inspection and other facilities for US customs officers at ports of entry. The fee currently just covers the salaries and other expenses for maintaining officers in the field. The AAPA and other signatories said in the letter that local customs offices have been asking ports to pay for “carpeting, heated driveways, unused computers, TVs, office renovations, and other capital improvements unrelated to cargo and passenger inspections.” “Many public port authorities are run by local or state governments with small, fixed budgets and limited discretionary spending,” the letter said. “Yet CBP has presented them with bills that often total hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in some cases, exceed $1 million.”It said CBP threatens to slow walk inspections or reduce local staff if the bills are not paid. The CBP Space Act would, if passed, directly prohibit the agency from asking ports to fund “administrative, training, or recreation facilities” at a port of entry. The bill would also require the CBP to provide an annual report to Congress on how the agency is spending the merchandise processing fee and require CBP to work with the Treasury Department on setting a fee that would cover capital costs for local facilities.Carlos Buqueras, the executive director of SeaPort Manatee along Florida’s Gulf Coast, said in the letter that it’s Congress’ responsibility to adequately fund CBP’s mission and that the legislation “puts Congress’ long-held directives into law … [and] allows CBP officers to restore their full focus to the nation’s economy and security.”Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

US ports and shippers are asking Congress to rein in the costs of customs inspections at local ports of entry, throwing their support behind legislation that would require processing fees to cover expenses related to inspection facilities. In a letter sent last week to six of the bill’s original co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and 26 other groups asked for renewed support of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Space Act (Securing Ports and America’s Commerce and Economy). First introduced last year, two of the original co-sponsors, Florida Rep. Laurel Lee and Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp, plan to bring the bill before Congress again this term. The CBP Space Act would require that the merchandise processing fee, which is based on the value of goods imported and can range between $32 and $634, would also cover any capital costs for inspection and other facilities for US customs officers at ports of entry. The fee currently just covers the salaries and other expenses for maintaining officers in the field. The AAPA and other signatories said in the letter that local customs offices have been asking ports to pay for “carpeting, heated driveways, unused computers, TVs, office renovations, and other capital improvements unrelated to cargo and passenger inspections.” “Many public port authorities are run by local or state governments with small, fixed budgets and limited discretionary spending,” the letter said. “Yet CBP has presented them with bills that often total hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in some cases, exceed $1 million.” It said CBP threatens to slow walk inspections or reduce local staff if the bills are not paid. The CBP Space Act would, if passed, directly prohibit the agency from asking ports to fund “administrative, training, or recreation facilities” at a port of entry. The bill would also require the CBP to provide an annual report to Congress on how the agency is spending the merchandise processing fee and require CBP to work with the Treasury Department on setting a fee that would cover capital costs for local facilities. Carlos Buqueras, the executive director of SeaPort Manatee along Florida’s Gulf Coast, said in the letter that it’s Congress’ responsibility to adequately fund CBP’s mission and that the legislation “puts Congress’ long-held directives into law … [and] allows CBP officers to restore their full focus to the nation’s economy and security.” Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

North American ports

Transport, Trade and Regulation News

Ports ask Congress to help shift the costs of operating local customs offices

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Some customers and competitors were surprised by the timing of the surcharges, which are typically implemented in August or September, if at all, and only after volume spikes.</div>

Some customers and competitors were surprised by the timing of the surcharges, which are typically implemented in August or September, if at all, and only after volume spikes.

<div class="phx-topic">J.B. Hunt Transport Services is defending its decision to impose surcharges of up to $1,500 per container on some shippers moving goods from Southern California, saying the fees are necessary to maintain service levels during an unpredictable peak season. <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/jb-hunt-hits-some-shippers-with-big-surcharges-in-southern-california-6043454">The surcharges</a>, which apply to certain retail, appliance and electronics shippers, are intended to ensure J.B. Hunt has the equipment and personnel in place if demand increases ahead of the holiday season, the company said during its quarterly earnings call late Tuesday. The surcharges are a tool, in a way, for J.B. Hunt to regulate how much unplanned freight it accepts during the busiest weeks of the year, ensuring there are enough drivers and containers to haul shipments for all its customers in Southern California. The surcharges went into effect July 13. “The last thing our industry can do is fail this shipping community at a time when the demand upticks,” Darren Field, president of J.B. Hunt’s intermodal division, said on the earnings call. “We have a handful of customers that said, ‘Hey, I might have extra business in July.’ We had many customers say, ‘I’m going to have the same peak I had last year’ ... and we just wanted a plan so we’re not caught by surprise.” <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="69b9e75c-ee79-4b00-9c29-ef0bc47d2af2"></dynamic-object></div>Meanwhile, maintaining strong service is important as J.B. Hunt and rail partner BNSF Railway performed above average in the second quarter, according to indicators. BNSF’s average Z-score, a proprietary Journal of Commerce calculation factoring train speeds, trains being held and idle laden railcars, has been positive for 13 consecutive weeks based on data filed with the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). Positive Z-scores indicate the railroad is outperforming its own history, while negative scores indicate underperformance. J.B. Hunt was also named the best intermodal provider by 41.5% of shippers in the latest Journal of Commerce Intermodal Service Scorecard, the highest percentage among its peers. The survey of more than 240 shippers was conducted between May 1 and June 30. The company regularly topped <a href="https://www.joc.com/resources/special-reports/domestic-intermodal-service-scorecard">prior surveys</a> as well, including in categories such as equipment availability, on-time pickups and on-time deliveries. Executing service becomes harder when week-over-week volumes become volatile. “This added complexity, lack of accurate forecast and potential for volatility, is why our peak season surcharge programs are starting earlier this year,” Spencer Frazier, executive vice president of sales for J.B. Hunt, said on the call. “Regardless of customer strategy and the shape of peak season, we will be ready to meet their demand when it occurs.” <h3>Some customers will look to skirt the charges </h3>Some J.B. Hunt customers and competitors were surprised by the timing of the surcharges. Peak season surcharges (PSSs) are typically implemented in August or September, if at all, and only after volume spikes. BNSF hauled more than 18,000 ocean containers during the week ending July 13, the highest since late January, according to data platform RailState. However, the railroad only hauled about 12,000 domestic containers during the same week, on par with its rolling 26-week average covering the first half of the year. J.B. Hunt implemented the surcharges after discussions with shippers over the last three weeks, customers told the Journal of Commerce. The fees apply only when a shipper out of Southern California exceeds its weekly contracted allotment, but the added costs can be substantial. “At $1,500 extra, our [competing] truckload rates become far cheaper,” said one J.B. Hunt customer who did not want to be identified. “That’s the trifecta of bad: higher rates, slower transit, and increased risk of theft.” Customers have also questioned whether J.B. Hunt incurs $1,500 in costs to reposition equipment to Southern California, or whether the surcharge reflects an attempt by J.B. Hunt to compensate for what it could not obtain during earlier contract negotiations. A second J.B. Hunt customer said they would take steps to avoid the fees. “We will look for opportunities not to pay the $1,500. That’s the short answer,” the source said. “We feel really confident that we’ll be successful.” Shippers said there are multiple ways to sidestep the charges, especially when only a few containers exceed weekly contractual limits. Some may shift overflow freight to J.B. Hunt’s competitors, both asset-based and non-asset-based intermodal providers. Others may opt for truckload carriers on the spot market, particularly as trucking rates remain low. Still others may delay non-urgent cargo by a few days, taking advantage of the weekly reset on allotments. It is not yet clear whether J.B. Hunt’s rivals will follow suit on the surcharges. While most major intermodal providers imposed PSSs last year, none set rates above $1,000 per container, except J.B. Hunt. Contact Ari Ashe at <a href="mailto:ari.ashe@spglobal.com">ari.ashe@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

J.B. Hunt Transport Services is defending its decision to impose surcharges of up to $1,500 per container on some shippers moving goods from Southern California, saying the fees are necessary to maintain service levels during an unpredictable peak season. The surcharges , which apply to certain retail, appliance and electronics shippers, are intended to ensure J.B. Hunt has the equipment and personnel in place if demand increases ahead of the holiday season, the company said during its quarterly earnings call late Tuesday. The surcharges are a tool, in a way, for J.B. Hunt to regulate how much unplanned freight it accepts during the busiest weeks of the year, ensuring there are enough drivers and containers to haul shipments for all its customers in Southern California. The surcharges went into effect July 13. “The last thing our industry can do is fail this shipping community at a time when the demand upticks,” Darren Field, president of J.B. Hunt’s intermodal division, said on the earnings call. “We have a handful of customers that said, ‘Hey, I might have extra business in July.’ We had many customers say, ‘I’m going to have the same peak I had last year’ ... and we just wanted a plan so we’re not caught by surprise.” Meanwhile, maintaining strong service is important as J.B. Hunt and rail partner BNSF Railway performed above average in the second quarter, according to indicators. BNSF’s average Z-score, a proprietary Journal of Commerce calculation factoring train speeds, trains being held and idle laden railcars, has been positive for 13 consecutive weeks based on data filed with the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). Positive Z-scores indicate the railroad is outperforming its own history, while negative scores indicate underperformance. J.B. Hunt was also named the best intermodal provider by 41.5% of shippers in the latest Journal of Commerce Intermodal Service Scorecard, the highest percentage among its peers. The survey of more than 240 shippers was conducted between May 1 and June 30. The company regularly topped prior surveys as well, including in categories such as equipment availability, on-time pickups and on-time deliveries. Executing service becomes harder when week-over-week volumes become volatile. “This added complexity, lack of accurate forecast and potential for volatility, is why our peak season surcharge programs are starting earlier this year,” Spencer Frazier, executive vice president of sales for J.B. Hunt, said on the call. “Regardless of customer strategy and the shape of peak season, we will be ready to meet their demand when it occurs.” Some customers will look to skirt the charges Some J.B. Hunt customers and competitors were surprised by the timing of the surcharges. Peak season surcharges (PSSs) are typically implemented in August or September, if at all, and only after volume spikes. BNSF hauled more than 18,000 ocean containers during the week ending July 13, the highest since late January, according to data platform RailState. However, the railroad only hauled about 12,000 domestic containers during the same week, on par with its rolling 26-week average covering the first half of the year. J.B. Hunt implemented the surcharges after discussions with shippers over the last three weeks, customers told the Journal of Commerce. The fees apply only when a shipper out of Southern California exceeds its weekly contracted allotment, but the added costs can be substantial. “At $1,500 extra, our [competing] truckload rates become far cheaper,” said one J.B. Hunt customer who did not want to be identified. “That’s the trifecta of bad: higher rates, slower transit, and increased risk of theft.” Customers have also questioned whether J.B. Hunt incurs $1,500 in costs to reposition equipment to Southern California, or whether the surcharge reflects an attempt by J.B. Hunt to compensate for what it could not obtain during earlier contract negotiations. A second J.B. Hunt customer said they would take steps to avoid the fees. “We will look for opportunities not to pay the $1,500. That’s the short answer,” the source said. “We feel really confident that we’ll be successful.” Shippers said there are multiple ways to sidestep the charges, especially when only a few containers exceed weekly contractual limits. Some may shift overflow freight to J.B. Hunt’s competitors, both asset-based and non-asset-based intermodal providers. Others may opt for truckload carriers on the spot market, particularly as trucking rates remain low. Still others may delay non-urgent cargo by a few days, taking advantage of the weekly reset on allotments. It is not yet clear whether J.B. Hunt’s rivals will follow suit on the surcharges. While most major intermodal providers imposed PSSs last year, none set rates above $1,000 per container, except J.B. Hunt. Contact Ari Ashe at ari.ashe@spglobal.com .

Rail News

North-American rail

Intermodal providers

J.B. Hunt says surcharges necessary to maintain peak season service

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">With more ships expected to divert to the longer Cape of Good Hope route around southern Africa, shippers could find it more difficult to secure capacity for project cargoes. </div>

With more ships expected to divert to the longer Cape of Good Hope route around southern Africa, shippers could find it more difficult to secure capacity for project cargoes.

<div class="phx-topic">Multipurpose vessel (MPV) availability could tighten globally in the near term due to a whole-fleet shift away from the Red Sea, just as breakbulk and project cargo demand ramps up. <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/new-houthi-attacks-likely-kill-hopes-of-shipping-returning-to-red-sea-this-year-6040923">Last week’s attacks</a> of the Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned Magic Sea and the Greek-operated, Liberia-flagged Eternity C by Houthis in the Red Sea are expected to prompt MPV operators that were still sailing through the Red Sea to re-evaluate the safety of the route. Kyriacos Panayides, CEO of MPV ship operator AAL Shipping, said that after the most recent attacks, more “non-western operators” are now considering the Cape of Good Hope route around southern Africa. “The Red Sea passage vessels on radar have reduced dramatically since last week, down to only ... [about] 30 vessels per day,” he told the Journal of Commerce. Market experts said the ship diversions could artificially reduce the number of MPVs available for breakbulk and project cargo loads in the short term as the entire fleet shifts to the longer Cape route. It could also reduce the impact of the two-tier MPV market that has developed over the past two years, where operators not targeted by Houthis continued to sail via the Red Sea, offering cheaper freight rates than MPV operators sailing via the Cape. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="1e7f3686-4313-47cb-9fe9-d40ac8e832e6"></dynamic-object></div>The longer sailing times for all shippers come on the back of a surge of cargo activity in the second quarter, where shippers withheld cargoes rushed to move orders before a reprieve for US tariffs expired, according to Ritesh Nair, head of projects at project cargo forwarder Rhenus Projects Logistics. The 90-day tariff reprieve for the majority of countries announced by the US was due to end on July 9. However, the Trump administration decided to delay its deadline for implementing reciprocal tariffs to Aug. 1. “We expect Q3/Q4 to be steady and then to pick up from Q2 2026,” Nair told the Journal of Commerce. “Vessel operators are hesitating taking vessels on time charter and cargo flows are shifting a bit, making the whole market super volatile and unsecure.” Nair added that it is “difficult to budget” in the current breakbulk and project cargo market. <h3>Misinformation, uncertainty are rife </h3>Nair also spoke of misinformation circling on risk mitigation strategies related to the US trade uncertainty. Giving the example of Free Trade Zones and bonded warehouses, he said that clients were confused about the benefits of each. “FTZs allow you to defer duties, but with bonded warehouses you can hedge against a future duty rate,” he said. “How willing is a customer or their finance team to hedge?” He added that space is drying up on bonded warehouses. In its July report, Toepfer Transport spoke of a “stagnation” in MPV charter rates, although acknowledged that the opportunity to achieve or outperform the index rate depends heavily on the trade region. On the demand side, Toepfer said some carriers have reported good utilization of tonnage, except in the trans-Atlantic trades. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="ea382181-08cd-4298-912f-87c79836bcf7"></dynamic-object></div>The Toepfer Multipurpose Index (TMI) slipped 1% to $12,895 in June, although it is up 1.81% year over year. Toepfer’s TMI is based on expected average rates for six- to 12-month time charters for 12,500-deadweight-ton (dwt) “F-Type” vessels with safe working loads of 240-360 metric tons, as reported to Toepfer by owners and operators. Toepfer did concede that some of the positive sentiment in the charter market was related to fixtures of F500 types, mainly newbuildings that are still to be delivered. Drewry’s General Cargo Index also dropped slightly month over month in June, down 0.7% to 137, while its Project Cargo Transport Index slipped 0.5% to 169 over the same period. The base point for both indexes is 100 starting in January 2019, meaning that the calculations begin from that point onward. Contact Carly Fields at <a href="mailto:carly.fields@spglobal.com">carly.fields@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Multipurpose vessel (MPV) availability could tighten globally in the near term due to a whole-fleet shift away from the Red Sea, just as breakbulk and project cargo demand ramps up. Last week’s attacks of the Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned Magic Sea and the Greek-operated, Liberia-flagged Eternity C by Houthis in the Red Sea are expected to prompt MPV operators that were still sailing through the Red Sea to re-evaluate the safety of the route. Kyriacos Panayides, CEO of MPV ship operator AAL Shipping, said that after the most recent attacks, more “non-western operators” are now considering the Cape of Good Hope route around southern Africa. “The Red Sea passage vessels on radar have reduced dramatically since last week, down to only ... [about] 30 vessels per day,” he told the Journal of Commerce. Market experts said the ship diversions could artificially reduce the number of MPVs available for breakbulk and project cargo loads in the short term as the entire fleet shifts to the longer Cape route. It could also reduce the impact of the two-tier MPV market that has developed over the past two years, where operators not targeted by Houthis continued to sail via the Red Sea, offering cheaper freight rates than MPV operators sailing via the Cape. The longer sailing times for all shippers come on the back of a surge of cargo activity in the second quarter, where shippers withheld cargoes rushed to move orders before a reprieve for US tariffs expired, according to Ritesh Nair, head of projects at project cargo forwarder Rhenus Projects Logistics. The 90-day tariff reprieve for the majority of countries announced by the US was due to end on July 9. However, the Trump administration decided to delay its deadline for implementing reciprocal tariffs to Aug. 1. “We expect Q3/Q4 to be steady and then to pick up from Q2 2026,” Nair told the Journal of Commerce. “Vessel operators are hesitating taking vessels on time charter and cargo flows are shifting a bit, making the whole market super volatile and unsecure.” Nair added that it is “difficult to budget” in the current breakbulk and project cargo market. Misinformation, uncertainty are rife Nair also spoke of misinformation circling on risk mitigation strategies related to the US trade uncertainty. Giving the example of Free Trade Zones and bonded warehouses, he said that clients were confused about the benefits of each. “FTZs allow you to defer duties, but with bonded warehouses you can hedge against a future duty rate,” he said. “How willing is a customer or their finance team to hedge?” He added that space is drying up on bonded warehouses. In its July report, Toepfer Transport spoke of a “stagnation” in MPV charter rates, although acknowledged that the opportunity to achieve or outperform the index rate depends heavily on the trade region. On the demand side, Toepfer said some carriers have reported good utilization of tonnage, except in the trans-Atlantic trades. The Toepfer Multipurpose Index (TMI) slipped 1% to $12,895 in June, although it is up 1.81% year over year. Toepfer’s TMI is based on expected average rates for six- to 12-month time charters for 12,500-deadweight-ton (dwt) “F-Type” vessels with safe working loads of 240-360 metric tons, as reported to Toepfer by owners and operators. Toepfer did concede that some of the positive sentiment in the charter market was related to fixtures of F500 types, mainly newbuildings that are still to be delivered. Drewry’s General Cargo Index also dropped slightly month over month in June, down 0.7% to 137, while its Project Cargo Transport Index slipped 0.5% to 169 over the same period. The base point for both indexes is 100 starting in January 2019, meaning that the calculations begin from that point onward. Contact Carly Fields at carly.fields@spglobal.com .

Breakbulk News

Asia-Europe

Project cargo

MPV availability likely to tighten in aftermath of latest Houthi attacks

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The European automotive industry has been hammered by Washington’s import tariffs that are imposing a significant financial burden on the continent’s carmakers. </div>

The European automotive industry has been hammered by Washington’s import tariffs that are imposing a significant financial burden on the continent’s carmakers.

<div class="phx-topic">The financial cost of US tariffs on the European automotive industry has been illustrated by Volvo Group, which was forced to take a $1.2 billion impairment charge in the second quarter as tariffs undermined profitability. With President Donald Trump’s threat at the weekend to impose 30% tariffs on all European Union imports from Aug. 1, there is no letting up on the financial pressure facing the automotive industry. “Due to import tariffs the company is currently unable to sell the Volvo ES90 profitably in the United States, while ES90 margins are also under pressure in Europe for the same reason,” Volvo told investors in a statement Monday. The Swedish carmaker said the $1.2 billion write-down reflected adjustments in expected production volumes of its two latest electric car models following the tariffs and “rightsizing the assets to the known market realities.” An impairment charge is the writing down of the value of an asset to reflect its reduced worth. The US imposed 25% tariffs on the steel and aluminum sectors in March and expanded that to include automobiles on April 3 and automobile parts on May 3, also set at 25%, up from 2.5%. Then, last Saturday, Trump, frustrated at a perceived lack of progress on trade negotiations, threatened to impose 30% tariffs on all imports from the EU from Aug. 1. The US is the largest market for Europe’s automotive industry, comprising 23% of the EU’s total car exports, according to data from the European Commission. With such a significant market share, auto exports from the port of Antwerp-Bruges, a huge automotive hub in Europe that handled more than three million vehicles last year, have been particularly hard hit by the US tariffs. There has been “a clear decline” in vehicle exports to the US via Antwerp since May as tariffs dragged down the numbers, the port noted in a statement this week <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/strong-h1-volumes-space-crunch-keep-antwerp-terminals-under-pressure-6043917">on its first-half operations</a>. In the first six months of the year, 15.9% fewer new cars and vans (76,089 units) and 31.5% fewer trucks and heavy vehicles (11,751 units) were exported. <h3>Eurozone pushed to ‘edge of recession’ </h3>The US tariffs will do no favors for Europe’s economies. Research consultancy Oxford Economics noted in a report this week that the threat of 30% tariffs was an escalation of the trade war that will push the eurozone economy to the edge of recession, with growth stagnating over the coming quarters. “Using our global economic model, we estimate that this could cut eurozone GDP growth by up to 0.3 percentage point annually over the next two years,” the report said. The 30% tariff threat surprised EU officials who reportedly thought they were close to a preliminary agreement with the US. Brussels has subsequently dusted off plans to impose its own targeted retaliatory measures on US products should the tariffs be implemented, but it is still holding trade talks with Washington. “The latest decision to delay its planned retaliatory measures until next month shows the EU still hopes to reach a deal before the Aug. 1 deadline,” the Oxford Economics report noted. Oxford Economics found US tariffs were also raising uncertainty and damaging business confidence in the EU, and by extension corporate investment, a sentiment that was picked up in the latest S&amp;P Global Germany Business Outlook survey. “Businesses report concerns about disruption to both demand and supply chains from increased US trade tariffs and the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, with the related uncertainty expected to limit business investment and growth,” Phil Smith, economics associate director at S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence, said in his analysis of the survey results. “The current geopolitical backdrop means that firms overall remain only cautiously optimistic about the outlook and are by no means fully loosening the purse strings, with growth forecasts and investment intentions still running below their respective pre-pandemic averages,” Smith added. S&amp;P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

The financial cost of US tariffs on the European automotive industry has been illustrated by Volvo Group, which was forced to take a $1.2 billion impairment charge in the second quarter as tariffs undermined profitability. With President Donald Trump’s threat at the weekend to impose 30% tariffs on all European Union imports from Aug. 1, there is no letting up on the financial pressure facing the automotive industry. “Due to import tariffs the company is currently unable to sell the Volvo ES90 profitably in the United States, while ES90 margins are also under pressure in Europe for the same reason,” Volvo told investors in a statement Monday. The Swedish carmaker said the $1.2 billion write-down reflected adjustments in expected production volumes of its two latest electric car models following the tariffs and “rightsizing the assets to the known market realities.” An impairment charge is the writing down of the value of an asset to reflect its reduced worth. The US imposed 25% tariffs on the steel and aluminum sectors in March and expanded that to include automobiles on April 3 and automobile parts on May 3, also set at 25%, up from 2.5%. Then, last Saturday, Trump, frustrated at a perceived lack of progress on trade negotiations, threatened to impose 30% tariffs on all imports from the EU from Aug. 1. The US is the largest market for Europe’s automotive industry, comprising 23% of the EU’s total car exports, according to data from the European Commission. With such a significant market share, auto exports from the port of Antwerp-Bruges, a huge automotive hub in Europe that handled more than three million vehicles last year, have been particularly hard hit by the US tariffs. There has been “a clear decline” in vehicle exports to the US via Antwerp since May as tariffs dragged down the numbers, the port noted in a statement this week on its first-half operations . In the first six months of the year, 15.9% fewer new cars and vans (76,089 units) and 31.5% fewer trucks and heavy vehicles (11,751 units) were exported. Eurozone pushed to ‘edge of recession’ The US tariffs will do no favors for Europe’s economies. Research consultancy Oxford Economics noted in a report this week that the threat of 30% tariffs was an escalation of the trade war that will push the eurozone economy to the edge of recession, with growth stagnating over the coming quarters. “Using our global economic model, we estimate that this could cut eurozone GDP growth by up to 0.3 percentage point annually over the next two years,” the report said. The 30% tariff threat surprised EU officials who reportedly thought they were close to a preliminary agreement with the US. Brussels has subsequently dusted off plans to impose its own targeted retaliatory measures on US products should the tariffs be implemented, but it is still holding trade talks with Washington. “The latest decision to delay its planned retaliatory measures until next month shows the EU still hopes to reach a deal before the Aug. 1 deadline,” the Oxford Economics report noted. Oxford Economics found US tariffs were also raising uncertainty and damaging business confidence in the EU, and by extension corporate investment, a sentiment that was picked up in the latest S&P Global Germany Business Outlook survey. “Businesses report concerns about disruption to both demand and supply chains from increased US trade tariffs and the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, with the related uncertainty expected to limit business investment and growth,” Phil Smith, economics associate director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said in his analysis of the survey results. “The current geopolitical backdrop means that firms overall remain only cautiously optimistic about the outlook and are by no means fully loosening the purse strings, with growth forecasts and investment intentions still running below their respective pre-pandemic averages,” Smith added. S&P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Ro/ro cargo

Trans-Atlantic

Volvo faces $1.2 billion write-down as US tariffs erode profitability

Use code TPM25GW995 at checkout to save $500 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Wide Box

SAVE ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION AND TPM26

Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Wide Box

UPGRADE TO GOLD FOR JUST $595

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code STS20 at checkout to save 20% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

SAVE ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION: Use code TPM25GW995 to save $500 on an annual Gold subscription and 20% on a TPM26 registration!

Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to Gold - Offer Box

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE: Use code STSW20 to save 20% on first year of a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - FT/Anonymous to S/SP - Offer Box

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on TPM26! 

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Offer Box

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A must-attend conference for shippers & logistics providers moving goods inland

Inland Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Inland25

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

The latest container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology solutions and end-to-end connectivity. Coverage includes the movement of containerized cargo handled by marine terminals and container ports, depots, container lines, drayage, consignees, importers and shippers, forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOs) and off-dock warehousing providers. The Journal of Commerce's container shipping news includes news from the trans-Pacific, Asia–Europe, North America–Caribbean, Central and South America trades, and intra-Asia trades.

Forwarding

Container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology and end-to-end connectivity.

Container Shipping News | Journal of Commerce

The Journal of Commerce is the industry’s source for maritime news and analysis about ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, global shipping ports, shipping technology solutions and end-to-end connectivity. Coverage tracks the movement of containerized cargo — from origin to destination — handled by marine terminals in the US and abroad, depots, container ports, container lines, drayage, consignees and shippers, forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOs) and off-dock warehousing providers, as well as pricing, capacity, volume and reliability on the trans-Pacific, Asia–Europe, North America–Caribbean, Central and South American and intra-Asia trades.

Discover comprehensive trucking news and trends with Journal of Commerce - from trucking LTL to regulation and trucking supply and demand.

Breakbulk News shipping | Journal of Commerce

Stay informed on port news worldwide with Journal of Commerce. From decarbonization to labor updates, get insights on global developments.

Port News | Journal of Commerce

Port News

News and analysis of ocean containerized cargo movement, logistics, supply chains, technology, and end-to-end connectivity. Maritime news and analysis of containerized ocean cargo movement, breakbulk and roll-on and roll-off shipping from origin to destination.

Latest News

More News & Analysis

Reefer fleet growth yet to show in availability of equipment

Ports ask Congress to help shift the costs of operating local customs offices

J.B. Hunt says surcharges necessary to maintain peak season service