<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Trade with India, which has been crimped by chronic port congestion at its public ports, may accelerate in the future as a result of the easing of congestion at major container ports...</div>

Trade with India, which has been crimped by chronic port congestion at its public ports, may accelerate in the future as a result of the easing of congestion at major container ports...

<div>Trade with India, which has been crimped by chronic port congestion at its public ports, may accelerate in the future as a result of the easing of congestion at major container ports, which is expected to follow last year’s reform of terminal-handling fees.In the last few weeks, two major global port operators have taken steps to build new terminals in India’s biggest container port, Jawaharlal Nehru Port, also known as Nhava Sheva, near Mumbai.Singapore’s PSA got approval to build its fourth container terminal with an annual capacity of 4.8 million TEUs, more than double the port’s present 4.1 million TEU...

Trade with India, which has been crimped by chronic port congestion at its public ports, may accelerate in the future as a result of the easing of congestion at major container ports, which is expected to follow last year’s reform of terminal-handling fees. In the last few weeks, two major global port operators have taken steps to build new terminals in India’s biggest container port, Jawaharlal Nehru Port, also known as Nhava Sheva, near Mumbai. Singapore’s PSA got approval to build its fourth container terminal with an annual capacity of 4.8 million TEUs, more than double the port’s present 4.1 million TEU capacity. The company won the contract with its bid of $1.3 billion and an offer to share 35.79 percent of the new facility’s revenue with the government. In addition, DP World laid the cornerstone for a new $200 million public-private terminal, called the Nhava Sheva Gateway Terminal, which will have a capacity of 800,000 TEUs. Drewry Maritime Research said the new investments result from the decision by the Indian government last year to relax the strict regulations that apply to terminal fees in its major public ports. “Ocean carriers will be watching this situation closely, as the easing of congestion in JNP would enable a number of significant schedule improvements to be made,” Drewry said in its weekly Container Insight report. The new PSA terminal will be the first to benefit from the tariff reform, which allows terminal operators to raise their fees every year based on market conditions, up to a cap of 15 percent, if they meet agreed performance standards. “The change could make investment in terminals in the major ports more viable and less risky, and help accelerate the addressing of congestion and capacity shortages,” Drewry said. The Indian government port reforms don’t address another chronic infrastructure problem that limits inland transportation, the poor condition of the country’s major road network. The government has been investing in building divided highways that are toll roads, but construction has been slow. In addition, truck traffic on untolled highways is slowed by sacred cows that wander freely onto the roads. Ports in India’s Upper West Coast and around Mumbai account for two thirds of the country’s container volume, and despite its congestion and limitations, JNP remains the biggest port in the country by some margin, according to Drewry. “Take away its congestion, and ocean carriers would no longer have to worry about vessels being delayed there before going on to other countries,” Drewry said. India’s private ports of Mundra and Pipavav on the northwest coast, up from Mumbai, are not governed by the Indian government’s fee regulations, which has enabled them to grow faster than public ports like JNP. They also have deeper water and available capacity. Volumes at Mundra for example increased 28 percent in 2013 to more than 2 million TEUs, making it the country’s second largest container port. It has an estimated annual capacity of 3.6 million TEUs and now includes a joint venture terminal with Terminal Investment Limited, part of Mediterranean Shipping Co. Most carriers currently operate separate service from Asia to the west coast of India and from Asia to the Middle East because of delays and congestion at Indian ports, especially JNP. Enhanced capacity and water depth at JNP, complementing that at private ports like Mundra and Pipavav, would allow carriers to combine services between Asia and the west coast of India with service from Asia to the Middle East, in much the same way as they do for services from Europe to the Middle East and the west coast of India. But progress will be slow, Drewry said. Contact Peter Leach at pleach@joc.com and follow him on Twitter: @petertleach .

International ports

Drewry: India’s Port Congestion Likely to Ease

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Ocean carriers are unable to evacuate the containers quickly due to operational restrictions and/or landside constraints at alternative ports of discharge in the United Arab Emirates and Oman.</div>

Ocean carriers are unable to evacuate the containers quickly due to operational restrictions and/or landside constraints at alternative ports of discharge in the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">Indian ports offering temporary shelter to stranded Middle East-bound containers are grappling with multiple operational challenges. Notably, the pileup of rerouted hazardous or dangerous cargo containers on dock, especially at Nhava Sheva (JNPA), has become a serious concern for Indian authorities, local sources say. That is because ocean carriers are unable to evacuate the containers quickly due to operational restrictions and/or landside constraints at alternative ports of discharge in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Oman. Khor Fakkan and Fujairah in the UAE and Sohar in Oman, which have become the supply chain lifeline for trades into the Persian Gulf during the war, are prioritizing general dry cargo handling. Additionally, vessels calling at Omani ports must pre-declare that they carry no dangerous goods. According to data from industry sources, a leading European liner alone is holding about 600 TEUs of rerouted hazardous loads at Nhava Sheva as part of recent trade diversions, exposing the dock to potential safety risks. Sources told the Journal of Commerce that the port authority there has sounded alarm bells through stakeholders about the urgency of clearing accumulated dangerous boxes, saying the cargo could become a ticking time bomb if it continues to be stacked up inside. Responding to that pressure, some carriers are now said to be exploring an alternative evacuation option via the Saudi Red Sea port of Jeddah. Adding to the alarm, the Nhava Sheva region reported multiple incidents of fires breaking out in off-site container storage depots over the past week, though the specifics of the cause were not immediately known. Nhava Sheva’s transshipment volumes in March swelled to 121,247 TEUs, up from 34,883 TEUs in February before the war began, data shows. JNPA was unavailable for comment. <h3>Hazmat exports a concern, too </h3>Mundra, Kandla and Pipavav are the other Indian ports holding Middle East-bound hazmat boxes, albeit fewer than Nhava Sheva, sources say. The predicament of carriers facing Middle East port woes extends to the storage of local/gateway hazmat bookings — mostly Indian chemical exports — already picked up for loading. Asian regional operators typically have a stronger appetite for hazmat handling, so they likely also have such volumes rerouted to India. One major factor driving that specialized shipping activity is the growing scale of lithium battery exports from China to the Middle East for renewable energy and electric vehicle (EV) needs, which have now accelerated due to the oil supply shock caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Contact Bency Mathew at <a href="mailto:bencyvmathew@gmail.com">bencyvmathew@gmail.com</a>. </div>

Indian ports offering temporary shelter to stranded Middle East-bound containers are grappling with multiple operational challenges. Notably, the pileup of rerouted hazardous or dangerous cargo containers on dock, especially at Nhava Sheva (JNPA), has become a serious concern for Indian authorities, local sources say. That is because ocean carriers are unable to evacuate the containers quickly due to operational restrictions and/or landside constraints at alternative ports of discharge in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Oman. Khor Fakkan and Fujairah in the UAE and Sohar in Oman, which have become the supply chain lifeline for trades into the Persian Gulf during the war, are prioritizing general dry cargo handling. Additionally, vessels calling at Omani ports must pre-declare that they carry no dangerous goods. According to data from industry sources, a leading European liner alone is holding about 600 TEUs of rerouted hazardous loads at Nhava Sheva as part of recent trade diversions, exposing the dock to potential safety risks. Sources told the Journal of Commerce that the port authority there has sounded alarm bells through stakeholders about the urgency of clearing accumulated dangerous boxes, saying the cargo could become a ticking time bomb if it continues to be stacked up inside. Responding to that pressure, some carriers are now said to be exploring an alternative evacuation option via the Saudi Red Sea port of Jeddah. Adding to the alarm, the Nhava Sheva region reported multiple incidents of fires breaking out in off-site container storage depots over the past week, though the specifics of the cause were not immediately known. Nhava Sheva’s transshipment volumes in March swelled to 121,247 TEUs, up from 34,883 TEUs in February before the war began, data shows. JNPA was unavailable for comment. Hazmat exports a concern, too Mundra, Kandla and Pipavav are the other Indian ports holding Middle East-bound hazmat boxes, albeit fewer than Nhava Sheva, sources say. The predicament of carriers facing Middle East port woes extends to the storage of local/gateway hazmat bookings — mostly Indian chemical exports — already picked up for loading. Asian regional operators typically have a stronger appetite for hazmat handling, so they likely also have such volumes rerouted to India. One major factor driving that specialized shipping activity is the growing scale of lithium battery exports from China to the Middle East for renewable energy and electric vehicle (EV) needs, which have now accelerated due to the oil supply shock caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Contact Bency Mathew at bencyvmathew@gmail.com .

Container Shipping News

Maritime

Rerouted Middle East hazmat containers spark safety concerns at Indian ports

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">But the port still bested Rotterdam, normally Europe’s busiest box port, though neither gateway said it experienced much disruption in the quarter from the war in the Middle East.</div>

But the port still bested Rotterdam, normally Europe’s busiest box port, though neither gateway said it experienced much disruption in the quarter from the war in the Middle East.

<div class="phx-topic">Antwerp-Bruges, typically Europe’s second-busiest container port, nonetheless bested Rotterdam in the first quarter by recording volumes of 3.4 million TEUs, slightly higher than its competing gateway. The volume, though, was a 2.6% decline from Q1 2025, which Antwerp-Bruges on Thursday attributed to bad weather and a four-day labor strike. In tonnage terms, container throughput at the port fell 5.5% to 36.3 million mt. “Overall, an estimated 100,000 TEUs (approximately 1.1 million tons) of container throughput was lost,” as some vessels diverted to other ports due to the weather and labor issues, the port said in a statement. “From mid‑February onwards, and particularly in March, volumes recovered, once again highlighting the need for additional container handling capacity,” the port said, as ships could only be partially unloaded due to a lack of spare terminal space. Separately, Ocean Network Express noted that berth congestion at Antwerp-Bruges caused two- and three-day delays to some Asia–Europe sailings in March that were already up to two weeks late. The port said imports from and exports to the Persian Gulf fell 12% and 49%, respectively, in the first quarter, but attributed that to weather‑related disruptions rather than the war in the Middle East. <h3>Rotterdam Q1 volumes flat </h3>Rotterdam, meanwhile, reported largely flat container volume growth in the first quarter. The Rotterdam Port Authority said in a statement Wednesday that Q1 volumes were 0.3% higher at 3.37 million TEUs, up from 3.36 million TEUs a year earlier. In terms of tonnage, container volumes fell 3.2% to 31.2 million metric tons (mt) “due to the sharp 14% rise in exports of empty containers, particularly to Asia,” the port said. Inland container volumes “rose sharply by 11%...driven primarily by Asia and North America, due to larger call sizes and an expanded range of services,” the port said without giving actual figures. Overall volumes at Rotterdam were lower than expected due to an update to the terminal operating system at the Hutchison Ports ECT Euromax terminal. Work on the system upgrade began in early January, but teething problems have negatively affected terminal productivity and handing capacity for both deep-sea and feeder vessels, Hutchison Ports said in a statement in mid-March. Landside operations have also been impacted with disruption to gate and terminal processes, which led to long waiting times for road transport, Hutchison said at the time. “It is expected that throughput volumes will only recover once the container terminal expansions have been completed,” the port said in its results statement. The port authority said there was limited impact from the war in Iran in the first quarter due to longer sailings made around southern Africa, but noted that could change as the war drags on. The conflict only began during the final month of the first quarter. "The closure of the Strait of Hormuz highlights just how vulnerable global energy flows are; the effects of this were only marginally apparent in the first quarter and may become more pronounced in the second quarter," Boudewijn Siemons, Port of Rotterdam Authority CEO, said in the statement. Contact Keith Wallis at <a href="mailto:keithwallis@hotmail.com">keithwallis@hotmail.com</a>. </div>

Antwerp-Bruges, typically Europe’s second-busiest container port, nonetheless bested Rotterdam in the first quarter by recording volumes of 3.4 million TEUs, slightly higher than its competing gateway. The volume, though, was a 2.6% decline from Q1 2025, which Antwerp-Bruges on Thursday attributed to bad weather and a four-day labor strike. In tonnage terms, container throughput at the port fell 5.5% to 36.3 million mt. “Overall, an estimated 100,000 TEUs (approximately 1.1 million tons) of container throughput was lost,” as some vessels diverted to other ports due to the weather and labor issues, the port said in a statement. “From mid‑February onwards, and particularly in March, volumes recovered, once again highlighting the need for additional container handling capacity,” the port said, as ships could only be partially unloaded due to a lack of spare terminal space. Separately, Ocean Network Express noted that berth congestion at Antwerp-Bruges caused two- and three-day delays to some Asia–Europe sailings in March that were already up to two weeks late. The port said imports from and exports to the Persian Gulf fell 12% and 49%, respectively, in the first quarter, but attributed that to weather‑related disruptions rather than the war in the Middle East. Rotterdam Q1 volumes flat Rotterdam, meanwhile, reported largely flat container volume growth in the first quarter. The Rotterdam Port Authority said in a statement Wednesday that Q1 volumes were 0.3% higher at 3.37 million TEUs, up from 3.36 million TEUs a year earlier. In terms of tonnage, container volumes fell 3.2% to 31.2 million metric tons (mt) “due to the sharp 14% rise in exports of empty containers, particularly to Asia,” the port said. Inland container volumes “rose sharply by 11%...driven primarily by Asia and North America, due to larger call sizes and an expanded range of services,” the port said without giving actual figures. Overall volumes at Rotterdam were lower than expected due to an update to the terminal operating system at the Hutchison Ports ECT Euromax terminal. Work on the system upgrade began in early January, but teething problems have negatively affected terminal productivity and handing capacity for both deep-sea and feeder vessels, Hutchison Ports said in a statement in mid-March. Landside operations have also been impacted with disruption to gate and terminal processes, which led to long waiting times for road transport, Hutchison said at the time. “It is expected that throughput volumes will only recover once the container terminal expansions have been completed,” the port said in its results statement. The port authority said there was limited impact from the war in Iran in the first quarter due to longer sailings made around southern Africa, but noted that could change as the war drags on. The conflict only began during the final month of the first quarter. "The closure of the Strait of Hormuz highlights just how vulnerable global energy flows are; the effects of this were only marginally apparent in the first quarter and may become more pronounced in the second quarter," Boudewijn Siemons, Port of Rotterdam Authority CEO, said in the statement. Contact Keith Wallis at keithwallis@hotmail.com .

Port News

Asia-Europe

Antwerp-Bruges Q1 container volumes dip on poor weather, labor unrest

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is revising the excess empty container fee in place since 2023 as off-dock depots become the focal point of trucker ire.</div>

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is revising the excess empty container fee in place since 2023 as off-dock depots become the focal point of trucker ire.

<div class="phx-topic">The Port of New York and New Jersey is expanding the fee it charges ocean carriers for long-dwelling empty containers to include off-dock depots outside of the port, a move that comes as port truckers face increasingly long and frequent delays when returning empties. But trucking interests question whether the now three-year old fee will ever effectively address the port’s bouts of empties congestion, which impacts shippers downstream through delayed container returns and detention costs. In an April 1 email, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey notified ocean carriers and other stakeholders about the revised marine tariff that will go into effect May 1. One of biggest changes to the tariff is in the “container imbalance fee,” which <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/ny-nj-readies-revised-fee-plan-for-long-dwelling-empties-5194202">the port first instituted in 2023</a> to incentivize ocean carriers to remove <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/carriers-need-to-sweep-up-ny-nj-empties-fmcs-maffei-5204204">the pandemic-era backlog of empty containers</a> at NY-NJ. Along with new language that says ocean carriers must “proactively and regularly manage” their empty container inventories, the revised tariff also references empties lingering at “nearby depots” along with marine terminals on PANYNJ property. The PANYNJ said the container imbalance fee always considered empty containers at off-port depots, even if not explicitly stated in the original tariff. Port Director Bethann Rooney said in a statement the revised tariff reinforces the imbalance fee program, which also has a new formula for calculating the excess empties that face the $100-per-container fee. “The container imbalance fee is a key tool, helping reduce congestion caused by excess empty containers,” Rooney said. “This...update strengthens the programs with clearer terms and greater accountability, ensuring our port remains one of the most reliable and fluid gateways in the country.” <h3>Hundreds of trucks turned away </h3>The trouble for truckers, though, is reliability and fluidity just outside of the port. APM Terminals contracted with one off-dock facility, Port Newark Depot, in February 2025 to handle the empties from Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd as they started services under the Gemini Cooperation alliance. APM said in a statement the off-dock empty yard “helps preserve on-terminal space for full cargo moves and reduces gate congestion...while giving truckers the flexibility to pick up empties for export and return them off-terminal when appointments are constrained.” However, Port Newark Depot also faces bouts of congestion and delays that have been frustrating truckers. “The on-street backups waiting to enter the depot have remained significant,” the Association of Bi-State Motor Carriers said in its April newsletter, “Desperate truckers often line up several hours before the depot opens, contributing to the backups and causing traffic delays.” While sporadic, Bi-State President Lisa Yakomin said motor carriers have reported that drivers face four- and five-hour wait times to get into Port Newark Depot, putting truckers at risk of running out of service hours. Yakomin said Port Newark Depot is trying to manage the truck queues with a few relief measures, including signs showing the waiting times, adding another container handling machine, and providing return instructions to drivers the day prior. But the sheer volume of empties can still overwhelm the 12-acre facility. Yakomin said a three-mile-long line of roughly 500 trucks was turned away from returning empties on April 10 because Port Newark Depot was full by late afternoon. “APM chronically runs out of appointments for returning empties, so PND is taking the overflow,” Yakomin said. “But if the marine terminal can’t handle it, how can a single depot? Expecting one depot to absorb the empties is unrealistic.” To address the overflow, APM said in a notice last week to truckers that an additional PND lot will be open for receiving Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd empties. The additional four-acre site can handle between 1,600 and 2,000 empty containers. Port truckers have also been directed to a recently opened 35-acre site, World Wide Depot, for returning empty containers belonging to Zim Integrated Shipping Services. That site is on the same plot of land as PND, But Yakomin said more off-dock space for empties will just mean more off-dock congestion. The issue is being exacerbated by instances of truckers receiving conflicting empty return information from an ocean carrier and a marine terminal, she said, adding to motor carrier costs by sending truckers on dry runs. “The more room you give the ocean carriers to dump their empties and let them languish, they will use it,” Yakomin said. <h3>Next step could be FMC </h3>The PANYNJ said in its statement that “while (the current imbalance fee) has been largely effective, some congestion has taken place if and when ocean carriers allow containers to accumulate to a critical point.” To avoid that, the PANYNJ said the new tariff shortens the evaluation period for determining excess empties from one year to six months. However, Yakomin said it is not clear if that represents any improvement, given the previous tariff referenced a quarterly period for assessing excess empties. Despite the previous tariff being in effect since 2023, the port still has bouts of empty congestion, Yakomin said. “The ocean carriers need to be held accountable for not removing their empties in a timely manner,” she said. As for updating the imbalance fee program, “that’s a little too late.” Yakomin said the next recourse is through the US Federal Maritime Commission, which might have leverage into the issue due to <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/stakeholders-sorting-out-per-diem-bills-under-new-fmc-rules-5192186">the billing questions raised by empty returns</a>. She said it is not clear whether ocean carriers are charging shippers detention on an empty container that had a return location but was full. Inconsistent empty return instructions would also appear to violate FMC rules on providing accurate billing information. Moreover, motor carriers still face being shut out of marine terminals for unpaid detention bills, Yakomin added, a further violation of FMC billing rules. “We would like the FMC to take a look at incorrect billing, but also more clearly define accessibility for an empty return location,” she said. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

The Port of New York and New Jersey is expanding the fee it charges ocean carriers for long-dwelling empty containers to include off-dock depots outside of the port, a move that comes as port truckers face increasingly long and frequent delays when returning empties. But trucking interests question whether the now three-year old fee will ever effectively address the port’s bouts of empties congestion, which impacts shippers downstream through delayed container returns and detention costs. In an April 1 email, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey notified ocean carriers and other stakeholders about the revised marine tariff that will go into effect May 1. One of biggest changes to the tariff is in the “container imbalance fee,” which the port first instituted in 2023 to incentivize ocean carriers to remove the pandemic-era backlog of empty containers at NY-NJ. Along with new language that says ocean carriers must “proactively and regularly manage” their empty container inventories, the revised tariff also references empties lingering at “nearby depots” along with marine terminals on PANYNJ property. The PANYNJ said the container imbalance fee always considered empty containers at off-port depots, even if not explicitly stated in the original tariff. Port Director Bethann Rooney said in a statement the revised tariff reinforces the imbalance fee program, which also has a new formula for calculating the excess empties that face the $100-per-container fee. “The container imbalance fee is a key tool, helping reduce congestion caused by excess empty containers,” Rooney said. “This...update strengthens the programs with clearer terms and greater accountability, ensuring our port remains one of the most reliable and fluid gateways in the country.” Hundreds of trucks turned away The trouble for truckers, though, is reliability and fluidity just outside of the port. APM Terminals contracted with one off-dock facility, Port Newark Depot, in February 2025 to handle the empties from Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd as they started services under the Gemini Cooperation alliance. APM said in a statement the off-dock empty yard “helps preserve on-terminal space for full cargo moves and reduces gate congestion...while giving truckers the flexibility to pick up empties for export and return them off-terminal when appointments are constrained.” However, Port Newark Depot also faces bouts of congestion and delays that have been frustrating truckers. “The on-street backups waiting to enter the depot have remained significant,” the Association of Bi-State Motor Carriers said in its April newsletter, “Desperate truckers often line up several hours before the depot opens, contributing to the backups and causing traffic delays.” While sporadic, Bi-State President Lisa Yakomin said motor carriers have reported that drivers face four- and five-hour wait times to get into Port Newark Depot, putting truckers at risk of running out of service hours. Yakomin said Port Newark Depot is trying to manage the truck queues with a few relief measures, including signs showing the waiting times, adding another container handling machine, and providing return instructions to drivers the day prior. But the sheer volume of empties can still overwhelm the 12-acre facility. Yakomin said a three-mile-long line of roughly 500 trucks was turned away from returning empties on April 10 because Port Newark Depot was full by late afternoon. “APM chronically runs out of appointments for returning empties, so PND is taking the overflow,” Yakomin said. “But if the marine terminal can’t handle it, how can a single depot? Expecting one depot to absorb the empties is unrealistic.” To address the overflow, APM said in a notice last week to truckers that an additional PND lot will be open for receiving Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd empties. The additional four-acre site can handle between 1,600 and 2,000 empty containers. Port truckers have also been directed to a recently opened 35-acre site, World Wide Depot, for returning empty containers belonging to Zim Integrated Shipping Services. That site is on the same plot of land as PND, But Yakomin said more off-dock space for empties will just mean more off-dock congestion. The issue is being exacerbated by instances of truckers receiving conflicting empty return information from an ocean carrier and a marine terminal, she said, adding to motor carrier costs by sending truckers on dry runs. “The more room you give the ocean carriers to dump their empties and let them languish, they will use it,” Yakomin said. Next step could be FMC The PANYNJ said in its statement that “while (the current imbalance fee) has been largely effective, some congestion has taken place if and when ocean carriers allow containers to accumulate to a critical point.” To avoid that, the PANYNJ said the new tariff shortens the evaluation period for determining excess empties from one year to six months. However, Yakomin said it is not clear if that represents any improvement, given the previous tariff referenced a quarterly period for assessing excess empties. Despite the previous tariff being in effect since 2023, the port still has bouts of empty congestion, Yakomin said. “The ocean carriers need to be held accountable for not removing their empties in a timely manner,” she said. As for updating the imbalance fee program, “that’s a little too late.” Yakomin said the next recourse is through the US Federal Maritime Commission, which might have leverage into the issue due to the billing questions raised by empty returns . She said it is not clear whether ocean carriers are charging shippers detention on an empty container that had a return location but was full. Inconsistent empty return instructions would also appear to violate FMC rules on providing accurate billing information. Moreover, motor carriers still face being shut out of marine terminals for unpaid detention bills, Yakomin added, a further violation of FMC billing rules. “We would like the FMC to take a look at incorrect billing, but also more clearly define accessibility for an empty return location,” she said. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

Trucking News

Surface

Container lines

North American ports

Marine terminals

NY-NJ updating port tariff to combat rising backlog of empty boxes

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">From tariffs to weather to labor shortages, the breakbulk industry has been forced to navigate a series of hurdles of late.</div>

From tariffs to weather to labor shortages, the breakbulk industry has been forced to navigate a series of hurdles of late.

<div class="phx-topic">New Orleans — With breakbulk demands and trade lanes shifting rapidly amid geopolitical events and trade volatility, coping with those challenges will call for communication, partnerships and planning among forwarders, carriers, shippers, and ports, attendees were told Wednesday at the Journal of Commerce’s Breakbulk and Project Cargo Conference 2026. “The biggest challenge that we’ve had in the last three months is making sure I have enough tonnage to take the volume increases that we are seeing out of Asia coming into the North America market,” said Brian Odell, lead ocean/barge/port mode specialist for power generation technology manufacturer GE Power, referencing cargo volumes shifting as a result of the conflict in the Middle East. Alain Akavi, managing director for COLI Group, said alongside a significant increase in traffic from Southeast Asia to the US and Europe, a lack of cargo in Europe has presented the biggest problem for the German global logistics provider, particularly when scheduling cargoes in advance. “You want to bring the vessel back in good time,” Akavi said. “But in some regions, you have a lack of cargoes, and then you need to parcel. And every time you parcel, you add more ports to the schedule.” Alex Strogen, chief commercial officer for the Port of Vancouver USA in Washington State, said that on a larger scale, US policy changes have resulted in unforeseen new challenges for the port. “We’re seeing our business impacted by policy in ways that I could not have even imagined in the past,” he said. Strogen cited wind energy cargo that previously had been moving through the port and is now routing through Canada instead. “That’s as a result of some of the shifting federal policies as it relates to wind energy here in the United States,” he said. Strogen also pointed to the effects of tariffs on aluminum imports the port traditionally handled. “Most of our aluminum came from the UAE. That’s a problem,” he said. As a result, Vancouver has focused on diversification as a long-range strategy, moving cargo in more lines of business than competing ports. “When you’ve got a broad base of different products and commodities that you’re handling, we have the luxury to try and shift and pivot,” Strogen said. <h3>‘Big influence’ from weather </h3>More so than geopolitical circumstances, weather is posing a growing challenge for moving cargo and is making it more difficult to ensure fixed-date shipping schedules, said Pieter Flohil, director with Dutch multipurpose/heavy-lift operator Spliethoff. “We’ve had an extreme number of delays this year,” he said. “Even if some people would like to deny it, weather is having a big influence on what we do.” Flohil also cited the industry’s labor shortages as a significant challenge, with fewer young professionals willing to learn the skills and work the hours necessary for a career in the trade. “That’s where we try to work closely with our partners in the port to ensure that they have invested in labor,” he said. “That’s vital for our existence in the future.” A willingness by carriers to listen to and communicate with logistics providers when there are challenges and delays goes a long way to making cargo transport easier, Akavi said. “When we have issues, it’s not on purpose. It happens,” he said. “And understanding is the easiest part.” Contact Autumn Cafiero Giusti at <a href="mailto:autumn@autumngiusti.com">autumn@autumngiusti.com</a>. </div>

New Orleans — With breakbulk demands and trade lanes shifting rapidly amid geopolitical events and trade volatility, coping with those challenges will call for communication, partnerships and planning among forwarders, carriers, shippers, and ports, attendees were told Wednesday at the Journal of Commerce’s Breakbulk and Project Cargo Conference 2026. “The biggest challenge that we’ve had in the last three months is making sure I have enough tonnage to take the volume increases that we are seeing out of Asia coming into the North America market,” said Brian Odell, lead ocean/barge/port mode specialist for power generation technology manufacturer GE Power, referencing cargo volumes shifting as a result of the conflict in the Middle East. Alain Akavi, managing director for COLI Group, said alongside a significant increase in traffic from Southeast Asia to the US and Europe, a lack of cargo in Europe has presented the biggest problem for the German global logistics provider, particularly when scheduling cargoes in advance. “You want to bring the vessel back in good time,” Akavi said. “But in some regions, you have a lack of cargoes, and then you need to parcel. And every time you parcel, you add more ports to the schedule.” Alex Strogen, chief commercial officer for the Port of Vancouver USA in Washington State, said that on a larger scale, US policy changes have resulted in unforeseen new challenges for the port. “We’re seeing our business impacted by policy in ways that I could not have even imagined in the past,” he said. Strogen cited wind energy cargo that previously had been moving through the port and is now routing through Canada instead. “That’s as a result of some of the shifting federal policies as it relates to wind energy here in the United States,” he said. Strogen also pointed to the effects of tariffs on aluminum imports the port traditionally handled. “Most of our aluminum came from the UAE. That’s a problem,” he said. As a result, Vancouver has focused on diversification as a long-range strategy, moving cargo in more lines of business than competing ports. “When you’ve got a broad base of different products and commodities that you’re handling, we have the luxury to try and shift and pivot,” Strogen said. ‘Big influence’ from weather More so than geopolitical circumstances, weather is posing a growing challenge for moving cargo and is making it more difficult to ensure fixed-date shipping schedules, said Pieter Flohil, director with Dutch multipurpose/heavy-lift operator Spliethoff. “We’ve had an extreme number of delays this year,” he said. “Even if some people would like to deny it, weather is having a big influence on what we do.” Flohil also cited the industry’s labor shortages as a significant challenge, with fewer young professionals willing to learn the skills and work the hours necessary for a career in the trade. “That’s where we try to work closely with our partners in the port to ensure that they have invested in labor,” he said. “That’s vital for our existence in the future.” A willingness by carriers to listen to and communicate with logistics providers when there are challenges and delays goes a long way to making cargo transport easier, Akavi said. “When we have issues, it’s not on purpose. It happens,” he said. “And understanding is the easiest part.” Contact Autumn Cafiero Giusti at autumn@autumngiusti.com .

Breakbulk carriers

Breakbulk ports

Breakbulk News

Breakbulk26: Trade lane shifts, policy changes among evolving challenges for breakbulk cargo

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A prolonged war would ultimately result in a shift from supply constraint to demand destruction for oil and natural gas coming from the Middle East, according to S&amp;P Global Energy expert Amy Groeschel.</div>

A prolonged war would ultimately result in a shift from supply constraint to demand destruction for oil and natural gas coming from the Middle East, according to S&P Global Energy expert Amy Groeschel.

<div class="phx-topic">New Orleans — How long it takes to resolve the war in the Middle East will ultimately decide how deep the compounding effects of the disruption to oil and natural gas production, refining, and the delivery of refined products will cut into global economies, Amy Groeschel, head of energy spending at S&amp;P Global Energy, said Wednesday. Groeschel was speaking at the Journal of Commerce’s Breakbulk and Project Cargo Conference 2026. A prolonged conflict would ultimately result in a switch from supply constraint to demand destruction for oil and natural gas coming from the Middle East, she said. “The longer the fields are not flowing, the longer and more expensive it will be to restart production,” Groeschel said, noting, too, the capital costs of repairing refining infrastructure at facilities damaged in the war. “The longer the conflict goes, and the more that affects access to fuel transiting [the Strait of Hormuz], the more it likely incentivizes oil and gas exploration elsewhere and incentivizes shifts toward other energy sources,” she added. Groeschel, a specialist in upstream energy analysis, described a “widespread destruction of refining in the Middle East” that would likely benefit engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies as well as the logistics providers that serve them when it comes time for costly repairs. But she said the scale of the outages and what OPEC countries produce, with some 16 million barrels of crude and refined products trapped inside the Strait of Hormuz each day, is “not replaceable in a short amount of time.” <h3>Venezuela not an option to replace Gulf oil supplies </h3>Groeschel noted that upstream spending on renewable energy was already on pace to outstrip oil and gas spending before the Middle East conflict broke out, with S&amp;P Global Energy forecasting peak demand for oil and gas by 2032. That trend might accelerate in the wake of the supply constraint, with countries and energy producers now looking at alternatives earlier than they might have. “It was an eventuality that clean tech spending was going to overtake oil and gas,” she said. “The infrastructure needed to build offshore wind would be larger. But the fastest growing sector is more modular solar, much of that coming from China.” Asked whether Venezuela could offset the oil supplies constrained by the Middle East conflict, Groeschel downplayed those expectations. “Venezuela produces heavy crude that has to be upgraded to even be transported by ship,” she said. “Rebuilding of those [upgrade] facilities will take time and massive investment, and a real commitment of government to produce stable conditions that let producers invest.” She added that even in the most optimistic forecast, Venezuela would be able to produce 3 million barrels of crude per day by 2030. Other potential oil-producing locations that could contribute to offset the lost supply from the Persian Gulf include Western Canada, the US, Argentina and Africa. S&amp;P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

New Orleans — How long it takes to resolve the war in the Middle East will ultimately decide how deep the compounding effects of the disruption to oil and natural gas production, refining, and the delivery of refined products will cut into global economies, Amy Groeschel, head of energy spending at S&P Global Energy, said Wednesday. Groeschel was speaking at the Journal of Commerce’s Breakbulk and Project Cargo Conference 2026. A prolonged conflict would ultimately result in a switch from supply constraint to demand destruction for oil and natural gas coming from the Middle East, she said. “The longer the fields are not flowing, the longer and more expensive it will be to restart production,” Groeschel said, noting, too, the capital costs of repairing refining infrastructure at facilities damaged in the war. “The longer the conflict goes, and the more that affects access to fuel transiting [the Strait of Hormuz], the more it likely incentivizes oil and gas exploration elsewhere and incentivizes shifts toward other energy sources,” she added. Groeschel, a specialist in upstream energy analysis, described a “widespread destruction of refining in the Middle East” that would likely benefit engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies as well as the logistics providers that serve them when it comes time for costly repairs. But she said the scale of the outages and what OPEC countries produce, with some 16 million barrels of crude and refined products trapped inside the Strait of Hormuz each day, is “not replaceable in a short amount of time.” Venezuela not an option to replace Gulf oil supplies Groeschel noted that upstream spending on renewable energy was already on pace to outstrip oil and gas spending before the Middle East conflict broke out, with S&P Global Energy forecasting peak demand for oil and gas by 2032. That trend might accelerate in the wake of the supply constraint, with countries and energy producers now looking at alternatives earlier than they might have. “It was an eventuality that clean tech spending was going to overtake oil and gas,” she said. “The infrastructure needed to build offshore wind would be larger. But the fastest growing sector is more modular solar, much of that coming from China.” Asked whether Venezuela could offset the oil supplies constrained by the Middle East conflict, Groeschel downplayed those expectations. “Venezuela produces heavy crude that has to be upgraded to even be transported by ship,” she said. “Rebuilding of those [upgrade] facilities will take time and massive investment, and a real commitment of government to produce stable conditions that let producers invest.” She added that even in the most optimistic forecast, Venezuela would be able to produce 3 million barrels of crude per day by 2030. Other potential oil-producing locations that could contribute to offset the lost supply from the Persian Gulf include Western Canada, the US, Argentina and Africa. S&P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com .

Energy projects

Breakbulk26: Loss of Persian Gulf oil supplies difficult to replace quickly

Use code GTT26W at checkout and save $900 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Use code SSFTW30 at checkout to save 30% on a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - FT to S/SP - Wide Box

SPRING SALE!

Use code GW595 and upgrade to Gold for just $595! Valid for first year of subscription.

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Wide Box

SAVE $900 ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION

Use code SSLW30 at checkout and save 30% on an annual Silver or Silver Plus subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to S/SP - Wide Box

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code SSGFTW895 at checkout to save $600 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - FT to Gold - Wide Box

Use code SSLW895 at checkout and save $600 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to Gold - Wide Box

SPRING SALE: Use code SSFTW30 to save 30% on first year of a Silver or Silver Plus annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - FT to S/SP - Offer Box

Subscribe and Save

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

SPRING SALE: Use code SSLW30 at checkout and save 30% on an annual Silver or Silver Plus subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to S/SP - Offer Box

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTT26W at checkout and save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SPRING SALE: Use code SSLW895 at checkout and save $600 on an annual Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous to Gold - Offer Box

SAVE $900 ON A GOLD SUBSCRIPTION: Use code GW595 and upgrade to Gold for just $595! Valid on first year of subscription.

Upgrade Subscription - S/SP to Gold - Offer Box

SPRING SALE: Use code SSGFTW895 and save $600 on the first year of a Gold subscription!

Subscribe Now - FT to Gold - Offer Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

The latest port news from the Journal of Commerce spans the globe from North Carolina and Florida to Shanghai and Singapore. Port news includes port automation, terminal construction projects, the future of decarbonization and net-zero shipping, dredging, port hinterland connectivity, labor, disruption, port congestion and cargo flow.

Longshore labor

Drayage

Port infrastructure

Stay informed on port news worldwide with Journal of Commerce. From decarbonization to labor updates, get insights on global developments.

Port News | Journal of Commerce

The Journal of Commerce is the industry’s source for maritime news and analysis about ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, global shipping ports, shipping technology solutions and end-to-end connectivity. Coverage tracks the movement of containerized cargo — from origin to destination — handled by marine terminals in the US and abroad, depots, container ports, container lines, drayage, consignees and shippers, forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOs) and off-dock warehousing providers, as well as pricing, capacity, volume and reliability on the trans-Pacific, Asia–Europe, North America–Caribbean, Central and South American and intra-Asia trades.

Discover comprehensive trucking news and trends with Journal of Commerce - from trucking LTL to regulation and trucking supply and demand.

Breakbulk News shipping | Journal of Commerce

Container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology and end-to-end connectivity.

Container Shipping News | Journal of Commerce

News and analysis of ocean containerized cargo movement, logistics, supply chains, technology, and end-to-end connectivity. Maritime news and analysis of containerized ocean cargo movement, breakbulk and roll-on and roll-off shipping from origin to destination.

Latest News

More News & Analysis

Rerouted Middle East hazmat containers spark safety concerns at Indian ports

Antwerp-Bruges Q1 container volumes dip on poor weather, labor unrest

NY-NJ updating port tariff to combat rising backlog of empty boxes