
The city state of Hamburg on August 25 agreed to an additional capital injection for Hapag-Lloyd, boosting the ailing ocean container carrier's chances of securing $1.7 billion in loan guarantees from the German government.
The port city's government agreed to a $1.32 billion cash injection, $320 million more than previously pledged by the carrier's shareholders, including Hamburg, earlier this month.
The increased cash infusion will stabilize Hapag-Lloyd and should fulfill the requirements for the carrier to receive loan guarantees from the federal government, Hamburg's finance department said.
Hapag-Lloyd needs a cash injection of at least $2.8 billion to survive the downturn in container shipping, according to TUI, its largest single investor with a 43.3 percent stake.
The Hamburg-based carrier raised $472 million in emergency funding in July with the sale of a 25.1 percent stake in Hamburg's CTA container terminal to its shareholders.
TUI contributed over $300 million with the remainder raised by the Albert Ballin consortium -- including the city of Hamburg -- which owns 56.7 percent of Hapag-Lloyd.
The cash injection still needs the approval of the Hamburg parliament and European Union competition regulators.
The German government will decide on Hapag-Lloyd's application for state loan guarantees by the end of September, the maritime industry minister Dagmar Wohrl said last week.
Hapag-Lloyd, the world's sixth largest ocean carrier, posted a $275 million second quarter loss against a year-earlier profit of $164.5 million, swelling first half losses to $622 million from $190 million in the same period in 2008.
Contact Bruce Barnard at brucebarnard47@hotmail.com.
Things will get worse before they get better for this beleagured company. Their mistake when buying CP Ships (paying triple what AP Moller paid for Sea-Land!!) and getting what in return? combined with the markets of today have made this a very difficult situation for them.
The Puerto Rican government gave up on thier entering the shipping arena after decades of losses, will the City government wait that long to pull their financial plug?
To further support the comment from Kingston4811, Hapag Lloyd paid more for CP ships than AP Moller paid for P&O Nedlloyd, and P&O Nedlloyd had much newer ships and was a leader in the Asia Europe trade and had a global presence. CP ships had several "brands" in different trades just before the purchase. The integration of CP Ships proved quite difficult and costly as CP had many executives and senior management staff with well over 20 years experience. Redundancy packages were astronomical.
It appears that this is the first government "bailout" of a shipping line.