Commentary

Commentary
Maybe you’ve heard about China’s rejection of the P3 Network. In all seriousness, I’m hesitant to cover an issue such as this because of the overwhelming analysis and observation that has come before me. But I have strong feelings about why China refused to allow it and a lot of questions about the real outcome.
In the end, does the “why” really matter? After 12 months of planning and countless millions of dollars, isn’t it enough that China said no to the largest vessel-sharing alliance ever proposed?

Latest Tweets

JosephBonney said: RT @Szakonyi_JOC: US-bound cargo surge (tied to ILWU contract talks) spurs CN to issue equipment allocations to liners via @Lavigne_JOC htt…
bwyker1 said: US-bound cargo taxes CN at Prince Rupert, Port Metro Vancouver. ILWU pact expiration sparks surge, CN says. http://t.co/gMblTmHJh0
Szakonyi_JOC said: US-bound cargo surge (tied to ILWU contract talks) spurs CN to issue equipment allocations to liners via @Lavigne_JOC http://t.co/RoCVRoTa4K

Video

William Rooney, Kuehne + Nagel vice president, responds to questions about the current slower growth environment and the NVO ability to provide “something broader than rates” as the trans-Pacific trade evolves.